1971 Corvette Engine Suffix Code Errors
I think you probably have an original CPH block in your 71. Someone goofed.
No real harm done and it makes an interesting topic of conversation.
I wouldn't crawl under to take a specific look - it's probably original. Next time you're under there for something else and in the vicinity, take a look then.
I think you probably have an original CPH block in your 71. Someone goofed.
No real harm done and it makes an interesting topic of conversation.





I worked at the Oldsmobile division dealership level parts dept as a parts counterman.
We had a batch of Oldsmobiles come through with a Y code(Pontiac)
350cid engine installed.
Threw everybody for a loop when ordering engine/electronics parts till we figured it out.
I don't think we ever revealled it to any of the customers.
Some how they used up/mixed up these engines on the Olds assy line?
So, yes it happened in the 80's, I'm sure it happened in the 60's/70's too.
Thee liquid lunch was still alive and well practiced in the 80's so I can only imagine what it was like in the 70's
The tank sticker is the build sheet GM followed.
It went from dealer order to build to delivery.
Your Towanda sequence # looks right as these were stamped w/ the heads off from what I've come to learn.
When you see the Towanda date stamp lined up with the vin stamp I get the restamp feeling sensors going off in my head.
And yes as stated, these two stamps are supposed to be different sizes. I see nothingg wrong either with the pad.
Kinda makes it like the coin that has the date stamped upside down.
Makes for a great conversation piece, oh and don't forget to enjoy it whille yor at it
Marshal
While you were under there, did you find the VIN derivitive stamp on the tranny?
It's beginning to look like your car may have been a factory four speed car and has been converted to automatic. That would explain the CPH suffix.
Last edited by Easy Mike; Jan 3, 2013 at 10:50 AM.
At the bottom of the tank sticker there is a code and a description for a standard transmission. I have seen a few other tank stickers coded this way.
The tank sticker will be tough to read via a photo.
I will provide all the codes on the sticker later tonight.
Also is there any good reference of the dealer codes and Zones from these tank stickers? NCRS has some info but its very little.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Block VIN matches windshield frame VIN which matches frame VIN,which all corresponds with door trim tag which corresponds with tank sticker.
Only issue is an auto transmission with a bolted cross-member.
From what I can see where the VIN derivative should be on the trans there are a few numbers that look like this 00300. These are in the larger font similar to the Tonawanda stamping. Trans is the correct TH400, but unsure of Date on trans tag.
Have you checked on a shipping data report for your car through the NCRS?
looking at the registry pics, it is hard to make a statement that the engine has never been out.
the approximate birthday of April 12th makes that engine block 75 days or so old prior to the car build. 75 days is ok by NCRS judging being typical of factory but is approaching the extreme end of what would not be questionable.
also the block sitting at the factory for nearly a month prior to being built is questionable.
I also see a tad of old paint on that stamp pad pic. Stamp pads were not painted at the
factory. make me suspect that the engine has been out. when an engine has been out.. anything can happen.
add all the date line up issues and painting of the pad together with the wrong broadcast code and I would not be convinced that this is the original engine. perhaps restamped by someone with the correct stamps but the wrong knowledge.
if I was buying a original engine car, the dates would have to line up closer and the stamp would have to be correct. This is just a car with several excuses, or NOM.
Normally, a block cast at the end of January, not assembled until late in February, and not installed in a Corvette until the middle of April would raise eyebrows. In this case, the date span may mean nothing more than St. Louis scheduling the back log of builds as best they could.
Ryan: can you read the date in the Date Received block at the top of your tank sticker?
looking at the registry pics, it is hard to make a statement that the engine has never been out.
the approximate birthday of April 12th makes that engine block 75 days or so old prior to the car build. 75 days is ok by NCRS judging being typical of factory but is approaching the extreme end of what would not be questionable.
also the block sitting at the factory for nearly a month prior to being built is questionable.
I also see a tad of old paint on that stamp pad pic. Stamp pads were not painted at the
factory. make me suspect that the engine has been out. when an engine has been out.. anything can happen.
add all the date line up issues and painting of the pad together with the wrong broadcast code and I would not be convinced that this is the original engine. perhaps restamped by someone with the correct stamps but the wrong knowledge.
if I was buying a original engine car, the dates would have to line up closer and the stamp would have to be correct. This is just a car with several excuses, or NOM.
Joewill - You are right it is in the C3 Vette registry. It was in a corvette resto shop that went out of business back in the mid 90's and sitting there till recently, in the condition its in now.



















