C3 Milage / Odometer question
No way to verify unless you have paperwork from PO that shows mileage at 99K then others w/ a later date that shows 12K.
I think a good way to judge mileage is to look carefully at the car.
Low mileage cars often have much/some of their original interior parts. For example the brake and clutch rubber pads will show some, but not a lot of wear.
Also on the chassis, a low mileage car may still have it's original springs, ball joints and shocks.
On the exterior a low mileage car may well have it's original glass and show minimal stone nicks.
If you stand back and let the car speak it'll often tell you if it has gone 31,000 miles or 131,000 miles.
Things tend to look worn, but not worn out. Be aware of parts that seem to be quite new, and consider why they may have been replaced on a relatively low mileage car.
Regards,
Alan

Just about any car that was traded into a dealer, in the 60's, 70's or 80's; got "clocked". It was very common for dealers (and private sellers) to roll back odometers. It use to be that a year old car, traded in with 20,000 miles on it, would show up a week later on a dealer's lot showing 15,000 miles.
In the 70's, some states started recording the mileage on titles, when ever ownership changed. It took other states another 20 years, to start tracking miles, and many still don't on older cars.
30 years ago, you never saw a used car with over 100,000 miles on it. Go look at a car lot today, and it's common to see cars with 125,000 or 150,000 miles.
An old Corvette, showing 75,000 miles, may not have 175,000 on it, but very likely has 125,000 on it.
I would think that a Vette with 30,000 miles would be noticeably "fresher" particularly in the interior than a 130,000mile Vette but it's an interesting conundrum none the less. What's to say some of the wear isn't from 30+ years as opposed to 100k+ miles.
The Vette I'm looking at is in very good condition for a 33year old car. Appears to have the original paint and minimal stone chips for example. It's had it's exhaust replaced (which I guess could be 30+ years of rust) and the front shocks have also been replaced but otherwise it seems original and well kept.
So items to check would be handbrake, clutch pedal (mins an auto), I'd imagine at 100k+ the steering wheel would have that smooth feel to it.
Under the bonnet I'd also imagine that a 100k+ car would show some signs of thermal baking on certain parts (eg: the under side of the bonnet)?
Anything else you experienced Vetter's look for when validating the odometer on a C3?
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

You can't poke a finger through the rust in the rocker channel of a low miles C3. But you sure can if you add another 100,000 miles to it.
I have 84k, orig owner.
when you consider the maint req'd, high cost of repair, narrow
field of qualified mechanics, it is not hard to believe they are parked a lot of the time.
I guess the important thing is if the motor looks unmolested and
testing shows good compression and clean plugs.
I don't know any other way to validate the milage.





Caveat emptor.



















