When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hi,
The existence of an NCRS LETTER is mentioned.....
but isn't there a LAW that states when NCRS Judging is mentioned as part of a For Sale advertisement the Judging Sheets from the events the car was judged at MUST be available for review by perspective buyers?
It would be interesting to see the judge's notes about the block's casting date.
Regards,
Alan
Because you are. I just saw this post. How did i miss it!!!!!
Maybe it was a joke, maybe not. It's my understanding that a Corvette may achieve Top Flight with a non original block providing it is typical of production at that time. The deduction for the pad would not necessarily be enough to make Top Flight unachievable. I would think a date code outside the typically accepted 6 month period would bring a larger deduction, how much I don't know. I agree with Alan71, it would be interesting to see what the NCRS judges made of this. I have always thought anything outside of 6 months was unacceptable. Should this period be extended?
Last edited by BBCorv70; Jul 17, 2013 at 11:52 AM.
Maybe it was a joke, maybe not. It's my understanding that a Corvette may achieve Top Flight with a non original block providing it is typical of production at that time. The deduction for the pad would not necessarily be enough to make Top Flight unachievable. I would think a date code outside the typically accepted 6 month period would bring a larger deduction, how much I don't know. I agree with Alan71, it would be interesting to see what the NCRS judges made of this. I have always thought anything outside of 6 months was unacceptable. Should this period be extended?
Do you plan on contacting the seller to get some answers?
Casting date is worth 175. There's no condition judging, just originality. And hopefully Mike or Steve or Alan can confirm, but I believe it is an all or nothing score for originality on the casting date, no minor deduct.
I am zipping up my flame suit in case Mike does come after me for assuming.
Do you plan on contacting the seller to get some answers?
No, I'm content with the one I have now. I was looking to see what prices people are asking for in todays market. This one caught my eye, the odd date code. This is just a curiousity to me. If I were an interested buyer, I'd certainly contact the seller.
Hi,
The existence of an NCRS LETTER is mentioned.....
but isn't there a LAW that states when NCRS Judging is mentioned as part of a For Sale advertisement the Judging Sheets from the events the car was judged at MUST be available for review by perspective buyers?
It would be interesting to see the judge's notes about the block's casting date.
Regards,
Alan
Never heard of that Alan.
Originally Posted by LeMans Pete
Casting date is worth 175. There's no condition judging, just originality. And hopefully Mike or Steve or Alan can confirm, but I believe it is an all or nothing score for originality on the casting date, no minor deduct.
I am zipping up my flame suit in case Mike does come after me for assuming.
That's correct.
You didn't conclude that judging is stupid cause they do it wrong, so no flame suit required.
Hi,
The existence of an NCRS LETTER is mentioned.....
but isn't there a LAW that states when NCRS Judging is mentioned as part of a For Sale advertisement the Judging Sheets from the events the car was judged at MUST be available for review by perspective buyers?
It would be interesting to see the judge's notes about the block's casting date.
Regards,
Alan
A law? Federal ? State law? I can't even fathom of a law that's related to the NCRS. Do you have more on this?
...I'd be suspicious since the date code falls far from the typical 6 months we usually hear about...
I'm not disagreeing with you. The six month rule is meant to be "typical" and is intended to account for out-of-the-ordinary situations. My only caution was guarding against assuming a ten month old block could not be original.
...For the money they're asking, I'd like to hear the story, have the pad checked out to look for evidence of tampering. We'll never know for sure if it's original...
Regardless of the price, getting to the bottom of things and checking everything is a good practice.
Funny? No. I don't know what an NCRS "award" is supposed to mean. I found it all rather vague. And the pad/Top Flight comment is true.
The letter is located in the photos. I tried to blow up the letter to read it better without success.
I can barely make out some talk about the grind marks. Maybe the stamp is addressed here. If someone can see what the letter says it would be interesting.
Very interesting. The letter was written in 1991 by (then) 70-72 team leader Terry McManmon, giving his opinion on the unusual dates and apparent restamped pad.
The letter is located in the photos. I tried to blow up the letter to read it better without success.
I can barely make out some talk about the grind marks. Maybe the stamp is addressed here. If someone can see what the letter says it would be interesting.
I can make out only bits and pieces. It appears to say the engine failed an inspection, the prior stamping ground out. This may explain the older casting date? A block which was recycled?
...It appears to say the engine failed an inspection, the prior stamping ground out. This may explain the older casting date? A block which was recycled?
Yep. Notice it mentions cylinder cases were recylced at Tonawanda and Flint.
Where is the engine number to be found? I don't think I ever looked to see if there was a time difference in my model '72, year of manufacture '71, which I bought new.
Very interesting. The letter was written in 1991 by (then) 70-72 team leader Terry McManmon, giving his opinion on the unusual dates and apparent restamped pad.
There is a pad on the block at the front of the right head (passenger's). The engine assembly date with suffix and a VIN derivitive are stamped on the pad.
71 and 72 stamps will be similiar with the exception of the 71s who used the C11 as part of the VIN derivitive.
There is a pad on the block at the front of the right head (passenger's). The engine assembly date with suffix and a VIN derivitive are stamped on the pad.
71 and 72 stamps will be similiar with the exception of the 71s who used the C11 as part of the VIN derivitive.
And the casting number and date is on the drivers side rear if you want to compare them to your engine assembly date. You'll have to remove some ignition shielding to get to it. It will be tough to see.
the judging guide does talk about failed engine assembly being taken back into the shop and cases ground down and stamped again for the appropriate car.. one would think this is really rare.. also the engine build date may 8 for a june 15 car... is a double bogey for this engine also..
to state that 6 months is typical is not right.. 2 to 6 weeks is typical, and 6 months is the extreme.. then to go out another 2-3 months past that is ultra extreme..... a late year car may indeed have some parts gathered from the bowels of the plant to complete the engine... who knows.
This is just another car with an excuse.. one will struggle getting big money out of this car because of this excuse.
Not sure why some people are so worried about stating that their car has an "original" engine - if it does. When a seller either does not know, or is trying to mislead an inexperienced buyer, they will state "matching numbers".
If an engine is original, it is original. I have a 1967 black/black 435hp roadster with an "original" engine. I see no significant value in the term "matching numbers", Either a car has an born-with original engine, or it does not. other than it denotes the "correct type" engine.
It is a shame that we have come to a time where the "matching numbers" term is frequently used - a very dangerous reference point for any buyer except the very, very knowledgeable and experienced.
For this reason, most of the very best original cars, of any make, trade within a relatively closed circle.