When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
"Any Help would be appreciated??
I was wondering if anyone has found an irregularity in certain bolts and screws? As an example, both of my seats of my 1972 have one mounting bolt that is a self cutter. One of the three screws that attach the horn plate to the column has a self cutter. My car is an original survivor with lots of original 'like new parts" on it to confirm its originality but I can't help thinking 'Bubba' may have been there.
May not have been Bubba. If the on-hand supply of regular production fasteners got low and if resupply/restock from the regular provider was delayed for any reason, the folks at the plant purchased equivalent fasteners locally from outlets at St. Louis. It is possible your self tapping bolts/screws could have been installed this way.
Hi OZ,
The seat track mounting bolts are a bit unusual in that they are pointed on the end. But, they're self tapping.
Might that be what you're seeing on your car?
Regards,
Alan
May not have been Bubba. If the on-hand supply of regular production fasteners got low and if resupply/restock from the regular provider was delayed for any reason, the folks at the plant purchased equivalent fasteners locally from outlets at St. Louis. It is possible your self tapping bolts/screws could have been installed this way.
From forums I have read there was apparently a huge strike or something around the early '70, so what you have suggested is a very real possibility. Thanks Heaps!!... AL
Hi OZ,
The seat track mounting bolts are a bit unusual in that they are pointed on the end. But, they're self tapping.
Might that be what you're seeing on your car?
Regards,
Alan
That's interesting Alan as mine are actually flat (no point), however they all have a fixed washer on them with the exception of the the self tappers.
Maybe the assembly line failed to install the screw.....and quality control personell installed the self-starting screw?
Anything is possible my friend as it 's DOM is Sept '71, VIN says '72 and it has '73 wiring through the entire car. (maybe the first with '73 wiring??)... Cheers AL
From forums I have read there was apparently a huge strike or something around the early '70, so what you have suggested is a very real possibility. Thanks Heaps!!... AL
There was a stirke during the 1969 production year. It did not affect 1970 model production other than to start it late (January, 1970) and end it early (July 1970).
A strike began in mid September, 1970 and ran through November, 1970, but this affected the 1971 model year.
There were no work stoppages during the 1972 model year run.
1972 model year production began in August, 1971. There would be no 73 parts on a 72 built during the second month of 1972 production. It is entirely possible parts used on 72s were also used on 73s the following year.
Last edited by Easy Mike; Nov 8, 2013 at 10:34 AM.
My Vette arrived early September '13 and prior I purchased a DVD Factory Assembly Manual '72 which included two different wiring diagrams, either of which were correct. The car had obviously been in salty snow as a lot of the metal had rust on it. As I started getting the alarm contacts and connections cleaned and operating, I noticed nothing married up with the schematic. A generous member whom I can not recall (my apologies) sent me a '73 wiring diagram and it is perfect. I currently have all the dash Left to Right and center console removed and working through little things that Bubba may have done, then she will be a Million Bucks to me.
My Vette arrived early September '13 and prior I purchased a DVD Factory Assembly Manual '72 which included two different wiring diagrams, either of which were correct. The car had obviously been in salty snow as a lot of the metal had rust on it. As I started getting the alarm contacts and connections cleaned and operating, I noticed nothing married up with the schematic. A generous member whom I can not recall (my apologies) sent me a '73 wiring diagram and it is perfect.
An AIM is essentially a snapshot in time. It represents a theoretical car built on a theoretical day. We all talk and complain about running changes on the cars and agonize over determining early or late parts. As such no AIM can be expected to show the correct configuration for each and every part or system.
It's very probable that your AIM shows a wiring schematic that was subsequently altered during the '72 production year prior to your car being built.
The car doesn't have '1973 wiring'- the AIM just shows 1972 config prior to your car.
An AIM is essentially a snapshot in time. It represents a theoretical car built on a theoretical day. We all talk and complain about running changes on the cars and agonize over determining early or late parts. As such no AIM can be expected to show the correct configuration for each and every part or system.
It's very probable that your AIM shows a wiring schematic that was subsequently altered during the '72 production year prior to your car being built.
The car doesn't have '1973 wiring'- the AIM just shows 1972 config prior to your car.
AIM ??? ... You've lost me!
Up until early September, Corvette was just a car I have wanted since I was a boy. But I am keen to learn so please clarify if that's OK??
AIM ??? ... You've lost me!
Up until early September, Corvette was just a car I have wanted since I was a boy. But I am keen to learn so please clarify if that's OK??
Hi OZ. "AIM"= Assembly Instruction Manual. It's a loose leaf book, containing all the assembly drawings, plus torque specs, and other useful bits of info used by the assembly plant when putting these cars together. As Mike Ward indicates, all the engineering changes throughout the model year are also captured in the AIM. This is a very useful reference book to have when working on your car. A Service Manual is another good book.
I'd also like to comment on the issue of self cutting bolts. In addition to all the other advice you've been given to help explain non-typical fasteners found your car, I'll offer that there are "repair" bolts for use on the line. When a bolt cross threaded or failed to reach torque for whatever reason, a repair bolt was used. The repair bolt is slightly larger than the production thread, which allows it to cut new threads instead of scrapping the item or sending it off line for a more complicated repair. In my earlier life, I worked in the GM seat assembly area. We used repair bolts for recliner- to-frame attachment when an operator messed up on the fastening. This was the case for other areas of the seat assembly too.
I hope this helps...
Last edited by redrdstr72; Nov 9, 2013 at 08:43 AM.
Sure does and Thank You!!
I am a perfectionist when it comes to my cars (aren't we all??) and am starting to be accepting of things that may be different. Put the Instrument dash back in today with the Speedo facing the right way (was crooked as it had no screws in it at all!!), surely we can chalk one up for Bubba on this occasion.
...a DVD Factory Assembly Manual '72 which included two different wiring diagrams, either of which were correct....I noticed nothing married up with the schematic. A generous member whom I can not recall (my apologies) sent me a '73 wiring diagram and it is perfect...
71-73 cars used the same main dash wiring harness. There are two depending on whether the car had factory air.
OZVette: if you are a perfectionist, you need to learn everything there is to know about 72s.
71-73 cars used the same main dash wiring harness. There are two depending on whether the car had factory air.
OZVette: if you are a perfectionist, you need to learn everything there is to know about 72s.
I'm doing just that chatting to you guys as the following is what US of A have sent me originally. To the best of my knowledge (so far) '72 had alarms as standard yea?? Second picture has Anti-Theft Horn but no rear swith, see why I ask so many questions.
Last edited by OZvette72; Nov 9, 2013 at 10:01 AM.
Hi OZ. "AIM"= Assembly Instruction Manual. It's a loose leaf book, containing all the assembly drawings, plus torque specs, and other useful bits of info used by the assembly plant when putting these cars together. As Mike Ward indicates, all the engineering changes throughout the model year are also captured in the AIM. .
No, the opposite is true- the AIM represents the 'status quo' on a single day during the production year.
Individual sheets were changed/updated in the AIM every time a component changed fit, form or function. Given that there were always running changes on these cars, sheets might have been update daily or weekly.
The AIMs we have now don't necessarily represent the last day of production, the first or anywhere in the middle. Pretty much a mishmash of somewhere between.
Regarding the alarm, it was standard on '72. The switch is mounted on the rear fascia on both '72 and '73. I know of no wiring differences between the two years with respect to the alarm.
Just as an afterthought- what book are you using for wiring diagrams? Neither of the scans posted above look like GM info.
If it a Haynes or Chiltons type book, please burn it. They've been proven wrong so many times it's not funny.
Taa Daa!
This is two pages of the '73 wiring diagram sent to me from the helpful member I mentioned previously and has been right on the money. (working from the back forward I am now at the windscreen and have found nothing incorrect on this schematic)