Thinking about replacing my frame
Looks like $4500 from this vendor...
http://www.parts123.com/parts123/yb....Z5Z5Z50000082A
Are there any problems with this frame? Price incorrect?
I'm working a trade+cash angle on the frame I'm eying now. May be able to get into it for $1k cash plus some parts I'm not using anyway. Will meander down this path first.
I appreciate the heads up, though. If I have to swing back to a different strategy, perhaps I'll give these folks a call...
I'm working a trade+cash angle on the frame I'm eying now. May be able to get into it for $1k cash plus some parts I'm not using anyway. Will meander down this path first.
I appreciate the heads up, though. If I have to swing back to a different strategy, perhaps I'll give these folks a call...
For example:
1968 frames unique due to first year run.
1969-1972 Frames are inerchangeable.
1973-1974 Frames are interchangable because the add on of the early rubber bumpers with no impact crap behind them. (can be modified to work on earlier cars if you are good at welding)
1975-1977 Frames are interchangable because all the front/rear bumpers are the same and the gas tank remained the same
1978-1979 Are interchangeable due to a different gas tank (changed to a different size because of the bigger back window.)
1980-1982 are interchangeable because the front and rear bumpers are the same, gas tank is the same, and rear suspension is the same.
All automatic transmissions corvettes had frames with a removeable cross member, all standard transmission corvettes has the cross member welded in place.
Last edited by chstitans42; Apr 5, 2014 at 06:46 PM.
If this works out, it would still make sense money-wise.
If this DOESN'T work out, that may be a direction to head...go to Carlisle with a wad of cash and an empty trailer...
Last edited by keithinspace; Apr 4, 2014 at 10:47 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
A bolt-in crossmember is desirable. So it may seem that I WANT an auto frame? Does the 4-speed otherwise just bolt in to an auto frame?
To that end, does the auto frame still have the Z-Bar mount? Or is that deleted from the auto frame?
If I get a manual frame, I'm going to modify it to make the cross-member removeable. Too much of a pain to pull the engine to access my transmission.
The "mod" that makes pre-mid-'68 a threshold is the large vertical gussets at the kickup.
The "mod" that makes the post-'74 threshold is the 'bumper tubes' that hold the 5 MPH bumper springs/hydraulics. The mid-'68 to '74 frames have all square metal in the back.
That's my understanding.
Nelson007
Thanks,
Nelson007
I have my old LT-1 Camel Hump heads, a good set of sidepipe headers, a complete LT-1 TI system, and an original LT-1 carb with correct metering blocks that I'm hoping to put in the mix as a partial trade/barter.
The guy who owns the frame rebuilds stuff, specifically Corvettes, and my engine builder (now frame broker) believes he'll work with me.
So, for the moment, hold that thought and let me chase down this lead for a week. If it falls flat on its face, I'll PM you. Those are all excellent thoughts.
So everyone knows, this isn't my first foray into frames...just the first hard lead I've had on a solid frame at a decent price. I asked a few non-local folks a few weeks ago and all the "bare frame" prices (no rehab, no sandblasting, nothing) were $3,500 to $4,500. It was discouraging, to say the least.
I don't disagree with the Steeroids thought. I can find a lot of uses for the gaping chasm between a $160 rebuilt box and a $1,300 Steeroids system. I know its better, but I can always add it later. Probably a good call.
Same with the trans. 60% chance I will drop my entire engine/clutch/trans setup onto the new frame without even cracking it open. I have <250 miles on the engine/clutch as I write this. 30% chance I'll open the trans and rebuild it. 10% chance I'll get a different trans.
I have a really good local powdercoater who can handle frames, so I'll probably get them to price it out. They do exceptional work and if it is under $500 for them to blast it and coat it, that'd be a no-brainer.
The carb I am staring at right now is a "DZ" Holley 780 LIST-4053. My understanding is that it is original to a '69 Z-28. The carb itself, though, is 100% identical to the LT-1 Corvette carb. The dual metering blocks are correctly coded (4159/5583). It is in great shape, but needs to be rebuilt by someone who knows what they're doing.
I think I'm looking for a car that DOES have the "kickup" gussets near the doglegs that were added in mid-1968 but DOES NOT have the "hydraulic bumper shock" tubes that were added in 1975?
If I'm creeping in on the right answer there, I'm still trying to find the big difference between an auto and 4-speed frame...
'm doing the opposite swap - my '69 frame for 800 is going under a 73.
In a month or so I'll probably have the two frames side by side as I transfer components over, I'll know for sure then
He was going to put in the removable crossmember as well as the z-bar mount, making it a custom frame specifically for me.
The guy has done this many times and is very comfortable in his work. I'm not UNCOMFORTABLE in it since the frame would CERTAINLY be straighter than the one under my car now. But this development has made me take a step back.
The offer on the table is $1,800 with me trading away a few of my 'stored' parts such as my old LT-1 heads and an original 1969 "DZ" code carb I have. I think I could get some off for my original drop-base air cleaner assembly with original wing nut. There may be a little more wiggle room in there.
This has prompted me to want to take a step back and see if there are any other options out there.
If this is a VERY VERY nice frame other than the fact that it is two frames welded together, I may be OK with it. It doesn't bother me, really, but I just have to feel comfortable that it was done right.
I need to compare that thought to paying $1k to $3k more for a "one piece" frame that isn't the best of two frames, but one frame that is in OK shape.
Decisions.
Any input?
second , I have been looking around and 68-72 frames seem to be a bit more spendy than the later frames. there must be some differences in the post 72 frames that would cause the price drop that I don't know about.
third, and this is strictly my opinion , a welded frame repaired or two welded together to make a good one would not be a problem with me. however I would take a lot of time and effort checking it out for dimensional correctness. it could be one of those things that will make your life miserable if there are some boo boos that found their way in to the finished product.
He bought all the tooling from GM and makes factory spec C3 frames and many other chassis parts. He has some nice frames stacked up and will make any adjustments you request. I plan on ordering a manual frame with removable cross member and adding the dog leg supports that the late 68's came with. More than I want to spend but I dont want any problems going back together and only want to due this once.
Jesse 982















