512 block
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 987
Likes: 484
512 block
So I bought a bundle of parts recently and 1 of the items was a 512 block for 1969. Everything looks good except the date code on the back of the block. The month code has been either ground down or just very faint and somewhere down the line another letter was epoxied over it. I'll show pictures a little later. The front stamping is near perfect, meaning the block codes, dates, and vin all look as real as rain, over the broach marks. 100% positive it's authentic. It is a 30 over motor. My concern is...if I chunk that epoxied letter off and the original letter has been ground off, would that devalue the block significantly. Any and all opinions are appreciated.
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 987
Likes: 484
Before I do anything with this block, I need to make every effort to reunite the car/block. This motor is the 435hp manual code and the vin # is very legible. I've made an effort to google the vin and came up with 3 hits, 1 was a previous sale, approx. 6 years ago. I called the broker, he's currently looking for info, but doesn't sound promising. The second is from a AutoLocator which has no contact info, just an ad, that I don't quite understand. The last is a listing in the corvette registry with the same info that matches the block, claiming the car has a replacement motor. All this lines up, but I still don't know the best way of contacting the current owner or posting the info. for the owner to track me. Again, need help.
Race Director
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 15,892
Likes: 42
Maybe you're overlooking the obvious. The car lost it's original motor at some point. The owner found this block but the casting date was too early or too late so he ground it off and made a new one with epoxy, then stamped the pad to suit. Unfortunately, this practice is not rare.
This motor was then removed for whatever reason and replaced with a third engine.
This motor was then removed for whatever reason and replaced with a third engine.
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 987
Likes: 484
Maybe you're overlooking the obvious. The car lost it's original motor at some point. The owner found this block but the casting date was too early or too late so he ground it off and made a new one with epoxy, then stamped the pad to suit. Unfortunately, this practice is not rare.
This motor was then removed for whatever reason and replaced with a third engine.
This motor was then removed for whatever reason and replaced with a third engine.
FWIW, I do feel confident on my ability to authenticate a pad stamp, not to say the most sophisticated forgery can fool most of us. I've also had at least 2 fairly knowledgeable folks other than my own set their eyes on it. I do have a strong opinion on why the block casting date was altered.
Race Director
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 15,892
Likes: 42
FWIW, I do feel confident on my ability to authenticate a pad stamp, not to say the most sophisticated forgery can fool most of us. I've also had at least 2 fairly knowledgeable folks other than my own set their eyes on it. I do have a strong opinion on why the block casting date was altered.
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 987
Likes: 484
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)
Joe Kucinski
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!
Brett Foote
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know
Joe Kucinski
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2
Michael S. Palmer
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor
Joe Kucinski
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!
Joe Kucinski
Intermediate
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 37
Likes: 6
The 3963512 block 1st started production in October 1968 as a 427, and continued through 1971 as a 454. What's interesting about your block is the location of the date code, which was moved from the low side(starter) to the upper rear November 17,1969. Since you know it is a 1969 code, and a rear date, it would have to be in a late November-to-mid-December build Corvette. As to why the date was changed by epoxy, ..... ????? The date tag is affixed by 2 screws, so any alteration would be very noticeable. I'm wondering if this could possibly be a Mcode block, as this is about the time of the 427-to-454 transition, and M does not decode to a particular month. It would be interesting to see pictures of the date stamp, and the front pad .... any chance of that happening?? As Mike has already mentioned, there is no reason to alter the date stamp.
Last edited by Lindstrom; Nov 1, 2014 at 12:05 AM.
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 987
Likes: 484
The 3963512 block 1st started production in October 1968 as a 427, and continued through 1971 as a 454. What's interesting about your block is the location of the date code, which was moved from the low side(starter) to the upper rear November 17,1969. Since you know it is a 1969 code, and a rear date, it would have to be in a late November-to-mid-December build Corvette. As to why the date was changed by epoxy, ..... ????? The date tag is affixed by 2 screws, so any alteration would be very noticeable. I'm wondering if this could possibly be a Mcode block, as this is about the time of the 427-to-454 transition, and M does not decode to a particular month. It would be interesting to see pictures of the date stamp, and the front pad .... any chance of that happening?? As Mike has already mentioned, there is no reason to alter the date stamp.
At this point, I've contacted the C3 registry, Christian and I have spoken and he is putting a notation for the owner. He has non-current owner info, just as I do. I had contact info who purchased the car from the registry's owner. That sale was 6 years ago. I emailed that owner, no response as of 1 week ago.
I'm at a loss, but the block is tucked away nicely and I don't have any immediate plans for it.
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 987
Likes: 484
Intermediate
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 37
Likes: 6
T0918LP decodes to Tonawanda, September 18, 1969, LP(L89 as mentioned) which means the car would fall in the 33,000 serial number range. First thing to try is put the full VIN on google and see if you get lucky. You can also try the National Insurance Crime Bureau(NICB) to find out if the VIN is in their database reported as stolen, but the NICB is not known for warm, fuzzy email replies(unless you get lucky). I'd still be interested to see a picture of what is going on with the epoxy letter on the date stamp, which makes absolutely no sense at all. It all sounds so ominous. In all probability, according to the build date you gave, the casting date should probably be September(I).
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 987
Likes: 484
Thanx.
I have googled the vin and that's where I landed the "for sale" ads and also the registry information.
My theory on the date alteration...these parts were purchased with a slew of '69 bbc solid lifter pieces, pulleys, tin, carb, etc and the block was naked awaiting machine work. I believe the seller was attempting a fake COPO motor and things fell apart for 1 reason or another. That LP stamping was soon to be wiped clean. It's the only thing that makes any sense to me.
I have googled the vin and that's where I landed the "for sale" ads and also the registry information.
My theory on the date alteration...these parts were purchased with a slew of '69 bbc solid lifter pieces, pulleys, tin, carb, etc and the block was naked awaiting machine work. I believe the seller was attempting a fake COPO motor and things fell apart for 1 reason or another. That LP stamping was soon to be wiped clean. It's the only thing that makes any sense to me.
Melting Slicks
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 283
From: cary Il
T0918LP decodes to Tonawanda, September 18, 1969, LP(L89 as mentioned) which means the car would fall in the 33,000 serial number range. First thing to try is put the full VIN on google and see if you get lucky. You can also try the National Insurance Crime Bureau(NICB) to find out if the VIN is in their database reported as stolen, but the NICB is not known for warm, fuzzy email replies(unless you get lucky). I'd still be interested to see a picture of what is going on with the epoxy letter on the date stamp, which makes absolutely no sense at all. It all sounds so ominous. In all probability, according to the build date you gave, the casting date should probably be September(I).
Intermediate
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 37
Likes: 6