71 LS5 at Mecum





Owner's ego. Much like many of the cars at Mecum/BJ.
Last edited by ajrothm; Dec 15, 2014 at 06:29 AM.
Is it sorta like musical chairs?
Someone pays too much for a car, and that happens several times until suddenly there's no one left willing to pay too much once AGAIN?
Regards,
Alan
I've seen several early c3's at auction get to where I thought the value was, and they did not sell. Too many to think it was just 1 delusional owner in over his head, trying to get too much back out of a car.
Either way, as a c3 owner, I like the increase value. But since I'm shopping for a chrome bumper myself, it's a bit much to digest.
Everyone always complains that prices are too high, and yet no Seller has ever said to me, "Mike, your offer is just to high, I'll only accept half".
Last edited by Revi; Dec 15, 2014 at 12:49 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Not quite a shame for folks selling.
I am NOT an advocate of price gouging. There are cars out there that are worth, perhaps, $2 PER POUND. I'd put my car in that category...bent frame, rust, tired engine, old paint. I LOVE my car and am very happy/proud of owning it. I bought it to work on it and there are LOTS of things to work on.
That said, I DO NOT like the idea of me turning my 45 year old chunk of steel into an awesome autocross monster, then have someone tell me that it's worth $14k. I LOVE the idea of a very well prepared and well preserved NOM car getting more money. And I LOVE the idea of the OWNER of a well prepared and well preserved NOM car DEMANDING more money.
I know the car in question...the one referred to in the OP's post...was 'numbers matching'. But if he wasn't willing to part with it for that money, that's his choice.
If EVERYONE did that, then perhaps some of our cars would start to get valuation closer to the blood/sweat/tears that I know many of us have PRIMERED their car in.
Capitalism: God's way of determining who is smart and who is poor. Ron Swanson
If it actually was a "$30k" car, then the seller should have been very happy with $67k.
So, Captain Obvious (me) sees only 2 possible scenarios:
1. Seller is a complete idiot and would not lower his ridiculous reserve to sell the car.
2. The $67k bid was not "real" money but was a shill bid and the seller couldn't actually remove his ridiculous reserve because there was noone (except maybe the seller himself) to stand behind that bid.
So which was it? (I would lean towards #2)
(It wasn't an LS-6 was it?)






If it actually was a "$30k" car, then the seller should have been very happy with $67k.
So, Captain Obvious (me) sees only 2 possible scenarios:
1. Seller is a complete idiot and would not lower his ridiculous reserve to sell the car.
2. The $67k bid was not "real" money but was a shill bid and the seller couldn't actually remove his ridiculous reserve because there was noone (except maybe the seller himself) to stand behind that bid.
So which was it? (I would lean towards #2)
(It wasn't an LS-6 was it?)





If it actually was a "$30k" car, then the seller should have been very happy with $67k.
So, Captain Obvious (me) sees only 2 possible scenarios:
1. Seller is a complete idiot and would not lower his ridiculous reserve to sell the car.
2. The $67k bid was not "real" money but was a shill bid and the seller couldn't actually remove his ridiculous reserve because there was noone (except maybe the seller himself) to stand behind that bid.
So which was it? (I would lean towards #2)
(It wasn't an LS-6 was it?)
Any C3 owner that had a legit bid of $67k would have taken that money and RAN laughing.... That owner was an idiot.
If it actually was a "$30k" car, then the seller should have been very happy with $67k.
So, Captain Obvious (me) sees only 2 possible scenarios:
1. Seller is a complete idiot and would not lower his ridiculous reserve to sell the car.
2. The $67k bid was not "real" money but was a shill bid and the seller couldn't actually remove his ridiculous reserve because there was noone (except maybe the seller himself) to stand behind that bid.
So which was it? (I would lean towards #2)
(It wasn't an LS-6 was it?)
The market on c3's is so soft right now that it is impossible for me to believe anyone in there right mind would ever consider paying 67k for a 71 LS5. The owner can now show what "someone" was willing to pay and then tell someone else they can get the car at a great deal for 50k (which is also way too high) Total scam.






The market on c3's is so soft right now that it is impossible for me to believe anyone in there right mind would ever consider paying 67k for a 71 LS5. The owner can now show what "someone" was willing to pay and then tell someone else they can get the car at a great deal for 50k (which is also way too high) Total scam.



















