When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I am looking at a 1970 L46, which owner swears in #'s matching, engine never out of car. He only sees a casting date and correct engine code (CTH) on the stamp pad. No 2nd stamping with VIN. He says there is a matching #'s VIN stamp on lower portion of engine near the oil filter, visible with car on lift. Is this possible or is this a big problem? Also, can a Dec 1969 engine build date match a very early production car (VIN <200)? Thanks
I am looking at a 1970 L46, which owner swears in #'s matching, engine never out of car. He only sees a casting date and correct engine code (CTH) on the stamp pad. No 2nd stamping with VIN. He says there is a matching #'s VIN stamp on lower portion of engine near the oil filter, visible with car on lift. Is this possible or is this a big problem? Also, can a Dec 1969 engine build date match a very early production car (VIN <200)? Thanks
I've heard of this on a '70 LS5 from a forum member.
Also mentioned on the C3 registry about half way down the page:
"L-46 with Alternate VIN Derivative stamp location - this alternate location is more commonly found on Camaro's but there have been documented cases where during the initial days of 1970 Corvette production the VIN derivative was stamped near the oil filter. (#00307, A06 Build Date)"
Wow, extremely helpful, thank you. I assume having to explain this rare variant would not affect value of L46? Is it possible to have such an early production 1970 with a Dec 18 (1969) build date on engine stamp?
Not really, once I did research to determine legit. I think enough documentation on the web about this variation, plus tank sticker, etc. to be clear to any buyer including myself.
Wow, extremely helpful, thank you. I assume having to explain this rare variant would not affect value of L46? Is it possible to have such an early production 1970 with a Dec 18 (1969) build date on engine stamp?
David,
The explanation in this case is pretty straight forward... This is how most 1970 Corvette engines were stamped for the first two or three days of production. If everything else checks out, you're good to go.
Considering that 1970 Corvette production didn't start until January 5, 1970, it's not uncommon to see engines assembled in December 1969 destined for early January 1970 cars. Again, just the normal flow of production. If I remember correctly, my old 1970 coupe, #00538, had an engine assembly date of December 29 (1969).
...Is it possible to have such an early production 1970 with a Dec 18 (1969) build date on engine stamp?...
Engines were ordered from the engine assembly plant, assembled there, and shipped to St, Louis before assembly of the Corvette was begun. For that reason, engine assembly dates always predate the time built date of the car.
I am looking at a 1970 L46, which owner swears in #'s matching, engine never out of car. He only sees a casting date and correct engine code (CTH) on the stamp pad. No 2nd stamping with VIN. He says there is a matching #'s VIN stamp on lower portion of engine near the oil filter, visible with car on lift. Is this possible or is this a big problem? Also, can a Dec 1969 engine build date match a very early production car (VIN <200)? Thanks
I met with several gentlemen that worked at the St.Louis plant when your corvette was built and they mentioned this alternate stamping location.I am going to meet with them again I will ask why this was done
Wes