C3 General General C3 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1975 was not a bad year !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2017, 08:20 AM
  #1  
75CORVT
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
75CORVT's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2017
Posts: 47
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default 1975 was not a bad year !

I am sick of this "worst year C3" crap about the 1975.

I deliberately chose a 1975 , because I live in California, and I did not want to own a c3 that needed to be smogged, which is a huge hassle.

Sure, I could have gone with a 76 and still not need smog, but then I would likely have the notorious floorboard issues.

I have an amazing car that has PLENTY of power, and on her original motor, 50,000 miles, starts instantly because of the excellent factory electronic ignition (first year) and to top it all off, I got the coolest license plate !
Old 03-14-2017, 09:33 AM
  #2  
Makonut
Racer
 
Makonut's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2002
Location: Newport News VA
Posts: 395
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

There are no bad years when you go thru the effort to keep one of these oldies on the road.
Old 03-14-2017, 09:53 AM
  #3  
Easy Mike
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Easy Mike's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Southbound
Posts: 38,928
Likes: 0
Received 1,469 Likes on 1,248 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran

Default

Originally Posted by 75CORVT
...I am sick of this "worst year C3" crap about the 1975...
Who says that?
Old 03-14-2017, 10:08 AM
  #4  
Tooonz
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Tooonz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2013
Location: Sutton MA
Posts: 992
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

75? you should hear what they say about 79's

Don't let the snobbies get ya down. Elitists will always find a way to try to compensate for their need to feel superior.

Last edited by Tooonz; 03-14-2017 at 10:08 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Torqued Off (03-15-2017)
Old 03-14-2017, 10:20 AM
  #5  
robjr67
Instructor
 
robjr67's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: Stafford VA
Posts: 142
Received 105 Likes on 41 Posts
2018 C3 of Year Finalist

Default



Always wanted a 70-72 chrome bumper C3. I also heard about the top Corvette's not to buy...75...being on top. When time came to buy a C3, I kept coming back to this....for about a year...then bought it....I'm so happy I did...I really enjoy it....
Old 03-14-2017, 10:24 AM
  #6  
Mr D.
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
Mr D.'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: Huntsville AL
Posts: 41,462
Received 1,486 Likes on 1,003 Posts

Default

Not sure where the term "worst year C3" is coming from for a 1975 but I will add that my first Corvette was a 1975 and that car was a POS.
Old 03-14-2017, 10:25 AM
  #7  
Krystal
Race Director
 
Krystal's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,341
Likes: 0
Received 101 Likes on 71 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 75CORVT
I am sick of this "worst year C3" crap about the 1975.

I deliberately chose a 1975 , because I live in California, and I did not want to own a c3 that needed to be smogged, which is a huge hassle.

Sure, I could have gone with a 76 and still not need smog, but then I would likely have the notorious floorboard issues.

I have an amazing car that has PLENTY of power, and on her original motor, 50,000 miles, starts instantly because of the excellent factory electronic ignition (first year) and to top it all off, I got the coolest license plate !
It's not just '75.........it's all C3s that don't have Chrome Bumpers.

But I agree the solid view that says this misses out on the obvious advantages of these cars.

The basic car is the EXACT SAME car from '68 through '79 and only very minor differences in the last couple of years in the '80-'82 models,

Sure the engine performance in the early days of regulations over smog controls.....was a disgrace.......but is there anything in a pre-computer era Corvette that is EASIER to fix than any performance deficit in the engine. Today a new crate motor can be dropped in between the fenders at small cost that make the hottest small blocks from the Chrome bumper era look weak too.

........and really........if you're going to DRIVE the car......rather just polish it with a diaper and trailer it to car shows....... isn't a car where the value isn't determined by it's matching numbers original engine the preferable way to go.

I own a '79 and honestly.....there was a time when an earlier model year C3 seemed more appealing.......but those years are long gone now. This car with a swapped out dated suspension for something more up to date that handles better and rides softer.....along with a 383 roller cam small block making gobs of torque and horse power blows any thoughts of an early model away. The interior in my car is just so much nicer than the earliest C3s.

In the end it boils down to this.

If I were a bigger fan of the idea of total originality and car shows.......no doubt I'd much sooner have the older C3 for sure.......but as driver on sunny Sundays in the summer........I like car better than the older models. I offer no apologies to anyone offended by that thought and here's another that likely offends. These cars from the '68-82 time period are only different from each other to the people who actually own them........it's been my experience that the average person out there has no clue as to why anyone might prefer a "68 to a '78........ for the personal not into Corvettes in any big way........one is no more or less cool than the other. They see the same car with only minor cosmetic differences between them.

Last edited by Krystal; 03-14-2017 at 10:30 AM.
Old 03-14-2017, 10:34 AM
  #8  
Krystal
Race Director
 
Krystal's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,341
Likes: 0
Received 101 Likes on 71 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by robjr67


Always wanted a 70-72 chrome bumper C3. I also heard about the top Corvette's not to buy...75...being on top. When time came to buy a C3, I kept coming back to this....for about a year...then bought it....I'm so happy I did...I really enjoy it....
That's a rag top you can drive anywhere......park most anywhere.........try saying that about a '69 Convert with a 427 matching #s motor.

Sure......I'm not picking your car over the older car if anyone offering 'em up at the same price........but at a fair price for each.......I"ll take yours all day and twice on Sunday.

I want a driver I can actually drive.....not a show car I have to actually worry about.
The following users liked this post:
robjr67 (03-14-2017)
Old 03-14-2017, 11:32 AM
  #9  
bashcraft
Le Mans Master
 
bashcraft's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Butler Pa
Posts: 6,391
Received 109 Likes on 83 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 75CORVT
I am sick of this "worst year C3" crap about the 1975.

I deliberately chose a 1975 , because I live in California, and I did not want to own a c3 that needed to be smogged, which is a huge hassle.

Sure, I could have gone with a 76 and still not need smog, but then I would likely have the notorious floorboard issues.

I have an amazing car that has PLENTY of power, and on her original motor, 50,000 miles, starts instantly because of the excellent factory electronic ignition (first year) and to top it all off, I got the coolest license plate !
How long have you been off your meds?
The following 2 users liked this post by bashcraft:
Cjunkie (03-30-2017), xpoc454 (03-14-2017)
Old 03-14-2017, 11:46 AM
  #10  
Tooonz
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Tooonz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2013
Location: Sutton MA
Posts: 992
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

I have a friend who has a 66 convertible. Totally gorgeous car, 50K miles. But he rarely ever drives it, Barely ever shows it and if it sees 50 miles a year then that's a lot. Would I love to have it? Absofriggenlutely. But I LOVE our 79 because we can drive it anywhere anytime,.....except in the rain, sleet snow or iffy looking clouds

On the bright side, the C3 having the length in production can cover a wide variety of tastes.

Drive em if you got em !!
Old 03-14-2017, 11:50 AM
  #11  
bj1k
Le Mans Master
 
bj1k's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh suburbs (Cabot ) Pa.
Posts: 5,743
Received 375 Likes on 293 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 75CORVT
I am sick of this "worst year C3" crap about the 1975.

I deliberately chose a 1975 , because I live in California, and I did not want to own a c3 that needed to be smogged, which is a huge hassle.

Sure, I could have gone with a 76 and still not need smog, but then I would likely have the notorious floorboard issues.

I have an amazing car that has PLENTY of power, and on her original motor, 50,000 miles, starts instantly because of the excellent factory electronic ignition (first year) and to top it all off, I got the coolest license plate !
What's wrong with the 75's ? It's the last year for the convertibles and has the one piece rubber bumper unlike the previous year. I love the 75's !
Old 03-14-2017, 12:02 PM
  #12  
Revi
Drifting
 
Revi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Forth Worth TX
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 148 Likes on 136 Posts

Default

They're not the worst C3's, just the most underpowered.
Old 03-14-2017, 12:19 PM
  #13  
75CORVT
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
75CORVT's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2017
Posts: 47
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Revi
They're not the worst C3's, just the most underpowered.
Surely there must be a C3 year with less power than what I have ?

Having driven mine enough to know, having more power might be more dangerous. I am happy with what I got.

I would love to Dyno my car some time, because I have owned a lot of V8 powered automobiles, but never one with this kind of torque.
Old 03-14-2017, 12:26 PM
  #14  
vettebuyer6369
Administrator
 
vettebuyer6369's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: About 1100 miles from where I call home. Blue lives matter.
Posts: 51,411
Received 5,331 Likes on 2,775 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 75CORVT
I am sick of this "worst year C3" crap about the 1975.

I deliberately chose a 1975 , because I live in California, and I did not want to own a c3 that needed to be smogged, which is a huge hassle.

Sure, I could have gone with a 76 and still not need smog, but then I would likely have the notorious floorboard issues.

I have an amazing car that has PLENTY of power, and on her original motor, 50,000 miles, starts instantly because of the excellent factory electronic ignition (first year) and to top it all off, I got the coolest license plate !
Who says the '75 is the "worst year?" And what's remarkably different about a '75 as compared to a '74 or a '76?

I know Corvette owners of a couple different years that are defensive about that slur applied their cars, but I think this is the first I've heard of the '75.
Old 03-14-2017, 12:32 PM
  #15  
75CORVT
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
75CORVT's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2017
Posts: 47
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vettebuyer6369
Who says the '75 is the "worst year?" And what's remarkably different about a '75 as compared to a '74 or a '76?

I know Corvette owners of a couple different years that are defensive about that slur applied their cars, but I think this is the first I've heard of the '75.
Heres who says '75 is the worst.
Jerks.

https://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/...-all-time.html
Old 03-14-2017, 12:34 PM
  #16  
Donald Stinson
3rd Gear
 
Donald Stinson's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2017
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Had a "75"

I had a 1975 Corvette Coupe it was a really nice car. Not much horsepower but had plenty of torque and it would hit the 160 mph on the speedometer. Not to shabby. Wish I still had that car back. I really like the 2017 zr1 but the price is gonna be around 135k. To much for me.
Old 03-14-2017, 12:58 PM
  #17  
Easy Mike
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Easy Mike's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Southbound
Posts: 38,928
Likes: 0
Received 1,469 Likes on 1,248 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran

Default

Originally Posted by 75CORVT
...Heres who says '75 is the worst.
Jerks...https://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/...-all-time.html...
Geez. It's a four year old magazine article offering the author's opinion. Why should what this guy has to say wreck your world?

Get notified of new replies

To 1975 was not a bad year !

Old 03-14-2017, 01:11 PM
  #18  
Revi
Drifting
 
Revi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Forth Worth TX
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 148 Likes on 136 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Donald Stinson
I had a 1975 Corvette Coupe it was a really nice car. Not much horsepower but had plenty of torque and it would hit the 160 mph on the speedometer. Not to shabby. Wish I still had that car back. I really like the 2017 zr1 but the price is gonna be around 135k. To much for me.
A faulty speedometer perhaps, but no stock 1975 Corvette could ever hit 160mph.

Here's the math to hit 160mph, assuming OEM 27" diameter tires,

2.73 = 5436rpm
3.08 = 6133rpm
3.36 = 6690rpm
3.55 = 7068rpm
3.70 = 7367rpm

Last edited by Revi; 03-14-2017 at 02:37 PM.
Old 03-14-2017, 01:16 PM
  #19  
Revi
Drifting
 
Revi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Forth Worth TX
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 148 Likes on 136 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 75CORVT
Surely there must be a C3 year with less power than what I have ?

Having driven mine enough to know, having more power might be more dangerous. I am happy with what I got.

I would love to Dyno my car some time, because I have owned a lot of V8 powered automobiles, but never one with this kind of torque.
Stock 1975 numbers below, first year for single exhaust/catalytic converter.
L-48 = 165hp/255tq (The lowest hp of all C3's)
L-82 = 205hp/255tq

Last edited by Revi; 03-14-2017 at 01:20 PM.
Old 03-14-2017, 01:26 PM
  #20  
bj1k
Le Mans Master
 
bj1k's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh suburbs (Cabot ) Pa.
Posts: 5,743
Received 375 Likes on 293 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 75CORVT
Surely there must be a C3 year with less power than what I have ?

Having driven mine enough to know, having more power might be more dangerous. I am happy with what I got.

I would love to Dyno my car some time, because I have owned a lot of V8 powered automobiles, but never one with this kind of torque.
Why do you even care what people say ? I have to laugh when people talk about horsepower and speed when they are talking about the C3's when my Honda Civic will out run most of them . I drive a C3 Corvette because of looks and feel sitting in the car and never drove it over 65 on the interstate usually in the slow lane. You have a beautiful car . Just enjoy looking at it and driving it.
The following 2 users liked this post by bj1k:
Peterbuilt (03-14-2017), Torqued Off (03-15-2017)


Quick Reply: 1975 was not a bad year !



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:44 AM.