When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm hoping it's Photoshop, but if not it looks like a well executed idea that I don't appreciate personally, but I do appreciate the craftsman ship that made it. That being said.... Ummm no thank you.
What's wrong with the cars as GM designed them? I think they are beautiful. But, I guess some like change for the sake of it.
Well the fantasy ideas in this thread with the clever photoshops is different to most real life mods, but the same in that some mods are sweet some are tacky, its up for personal tastes, for example you dig the stock 74 to 79 rear yet a gm designer larry shina- somebody called the styling a steaming dog turd, thats pretty darn harsh but his opinion, and i btw think a car like your 77 is sweet,
I wish i didnt like things that didnt come on the c3s,
i wish gm had made the perfect to me c3, they didnt so i had to, most modders of c3s feel as i do in some way or another hence why we make our perfect c3.
Last edited by The13Bats; Aug 8, 2017 at 07:52 AM.
Maybe there is something to be said for the creative mind being allowed to wander.
John has a neat restomod he is working on which has given me the chance to see how a creative mind ebbs and flows through a new concept car. Called Darth Vader Vette I see an inspiring design coming from a creative mind. That is what I see with these designs as well.
Who am I to say they are in poor taste, they are just not familiar.
I do admire the craftsmanship though, and I wish I had that talent whether is working with steel, fiberglass, or computers.
I'm hoping it's Photoshop, but if not it looks like a well executed idea that I don't appreciate personally, but I do appreciate the craftsman ship that made it. That being said.... Ummm no thank you.
Your Thoughts On This Modification
