When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hello,
After a long break without a C3 I am getting the bug. Been searching for 1970 LT1
A friend called me with one for sale under 30K, but it is lacking power steering and PB. I have never drove a car without either, how bad is it? Has anyone got one without and regretted it. And last if I can not stand it how hard is it going to be to sell?
Thank you.
No power anything on my '71 and it drives fine. The only thing you'll notice is steering effort in parking lots etc. At least that's the only thing I notice when driving my Vette compared to my other vehicles.
If you are seriously looking and come across a 70 LT-1 for under $30K, what are you waiting for? If it's a straight, matching #'s car, you caught the seller sleeping.
If I would buy again a C3 I would definately look at a car with manual everything!
No PB, PS, PW! Nothing!
In Europe I was used at buying a car in the late 90s that didn't have anything power. Only brakes were, everything else was manual!
The only thing that I remember is that I had to change the steering joint quite often as with time it got some slack because of the parking. That was it!
“How bad is it?” It’s really not bad at all. I grew up without any power options of any sort in my ‘67 Camaro. It’s almost fitting for a ‘70’s performance car in my opinion to be without P/B P/S, etc. I’m searching now, and wouldn’t hesitate to purchase a C3 without power assist. Best of luck!
I switched to manual steering on my 80. It feels great, and I would never go back to stock PS. I have no opinion on PBs, other than to point out that if you find manual brakes lacking, a Hydroboost conversion may be the way to go. You'd have to add a power steering pump, though, so you may as well get a Borgeson box at that point if you spend a lot of time in parking lots.
My LT-1 has power steering and power brakes. I wish it had neither. The power steering gives almost zero road feedback and is almost effortless, saw as the "allure" of these systems back in the '70's. My brother's LT-1 has manual everything and it feels much more proper, like a sports car should feel. The power brakes are nice, but not all that much better than manual brakes. For the sake of simplicity.....and less things to go wrong/fix, I'd opt for manual brakes.
Thank you all,
No PS and no PB seems like it is no problem. I am going to go look at the car, it is not a steal, not numbers matching, repaint (rough) with scratches. If I pass 50-50 rather pay more and get exactly what I want I will be happy to pass it on, just message me. It is green with tan,
It is "no problem" for those who are used to having cars without them.
For you, it would be a problem....at least for a period of time until you built up your leg muscles (it is a manual transmission car, so the left leg will be busy) and arm muscles.
Power steering is only 'important' when the car is at rest or at very slow speeds (under 3 mph). With any speed at all, P/S is not really necessary.
Manual brakes will stop just as well as power brakes...but the pedal effort to do so is much higher.
So, if you are in reasonably good physical condition, it's no big deal. If you have some physical 'issues', you might do better to have P/S & P/B on the car you purchase.
I have neither power brakes nor power steering on my 71. Oddly, it has AC and power windows. I can work up a sweat parallel parking. Otherwise, no big deal.
Thank you all,
No PS and no PB seems like it is no problem. I am going to go look at the car, it is not a steal, not numbers matching, repaint (rough) with scratches. If I pass 50-50 rather pay more and get exactly what I want I will be happy to pass it on, just message me. It is green with tan,
Then do that and dont settle, you wont be happy with anything else...
ESPECIALLY as it is NOM. means it is NOT an LT-1. It is a 70 with an LT-1 tach redline and hood.
Fact it is a NOM DOES NOT mean it cannot be an LT-1. An LT-1 is an option package clearly defined in the AIM. Nothing in the AIM specifies specific serial numbers. NCRS will grant nearly full credit, judged as an LT-1, score top flight as well as an original. There is no reason it cannot be restored as an LT-1 if that's what it was originally. Not sure what to make of the hostility toward NOMs. No logic to the statement it will never be an LT-1 again. Same goes for all other non base model option codes.
For earlier years without reference to the original motor built into the serial number, I admit there's the problem of forgery, cars which were base models being passed off as higher performance cars. The tank sheet may be the only proof available. For years which the original engine installed can be proven, I see no reason they cannot be restored and get as much respect as originals. They may not fetch as much $$ as originals, assuming true originals are more rare.
It is important a potential buyer be aware of the premium paid for a thought to be original LT-1. A NOM LT-1 will likely trade at lower values. Could be a fun driver, cheaper than an original, no risk of lost originality.
ESPECIALLY as it is NOM. means it is NOT an LT-1. It is a 70 with an LT-1 tach redline and hood.
You know im a modder and numbers and originality do not mean much to me,
However
If it was a born at the factory LT1 i dont care if someone stuck a buick v6 in it with a corvette summer body kit on it the car is still an LT1,
Doesnt matter i drop a bb, a 4 speed etc in my 69 and tack on flares and an L88 hood the car is still a near base model 69,
Real factory L88 cars fetch big money and very few have the original engines which were mostly blown up years ago,
Some have the orginal engine rebuilt and some not even that but they are still real factory L88s.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.