LT-1 or LS5?
The '70 is the more desirable having 370bhp then 330 and lastly 255 but they changed the way these outputs were measured so the '70 & '71 were closer than the difference shown I believe. There's a Ontario Orange '71 LT-1 NCRS Top Flight for sale at the moment with an ask of £45k with a re-stamped decked block?
Your target seems to have shifted from a C3 to a chrome bumper C3 and now BB & LT-1's. All I would say is bide your time and buy the best you can as these things arn't cheap to fix up given the import penalties on parts and shipping costs.
Stuart
I saw the £45k one on eBay.
This no doubt contributed to the reasons why, between 1970-1972, only 4,977 LT1 cars were sold, while the LS5 ran to a total of 13,483 cars.
Since both options have always been desirable, rarity tends to play a prominent role in relative value.





This no doubt contributed to the reasons why, between 1970-1972, only 4,977 LT1 cars were sold, while the LS5 ran to a total of 13,483 cars.
Since both options have always been desirable, rarity tends to play a prominent role in relative value.
It was not quite 4% of the the price of the car....or less than $200
yet the LT1 is a much more rare car. so several intangibles skew the price.
$289.65 + ~54% = $447.60.
With respect to the price of the car, the math would look like this.
The LS5 at $289.65 cost ~5.6% of the base price of the 1970 coupe at $5,192.
The LT1 at $447.60 cost ~8.6% of the base price of the 1970 coupe at $5,192.
5.6% + ~54% = 8.6%.
-----------------------------
1979 L82 M21 FE7
Classic White / Doeskin





$289.65 + ~54% = $447.60.
With respect to the price of the car, the math would look like this.
The LS5 at $289.65 cost ~5.6% of the base price of the 1970 coupe at $5,192.
The LT1 at $447.60 cost ~8.6% of the base price of the 1970 coupe at $5,192.
5.6% + ~54% = 8.6%.
-----------------------------
1979 L82 M21 FE7
Classic White / Doeskin
How you worded it- sounded like you meant the LT-1 car sold for 50+% more...
I took an average price- $5400 and used a rounded up number of $200- So 3.7% added to the purchase price to buy the LT-1....
So if you were in the showroom back in the day-
Looking at an engine that needed 42% more bolts to hold the valve covers on-
4" longer and almost 4" taller
Over 100 CID more
Of course the Big Block sold more- a lot more engine for your money!!!
When I was 18 and bought my 71 LS-5 (1981) -
Can't tell you how many times I opened the hood as people were dumbfounded to see that big of an engine is a small car.
Back then- everybody was running around with a small block...
Just because less were sold - saying they are necessarily "rare"- doesn't always add value or desirability- Example 69 with a 3 speed manual....
Even Hagerty values the LS-5 as slightly more valuable-


.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I was referring only to the options, which I later clarified in response to your earlier inquiry. Again, what I was trying to say was...
Among the 1970 engine choices available, the LT1 option was offered to buyers at a ~54% premium over the LS5 option.
However, as I stated earlier... Since both options, LT1 and LS5, have always been desirable, rarity tends to play a prominent role in their relative value.
I love the way you maintain your LS5 engine compartment, shown in your photo above. Same for Last Triumph. They look like incredibly nice Corvettes. Thanks to both of you for the photos.
-----------------------------
1979 L82 M21 FE7
Classic White / Doeskin





I was referring only to the options, which I later clarified in response to your earlier inquiry. Again, what I was trying to say was...
Among the 1970 engine choices available, the LT1 option was offered to buyers at a ~54% premium over the LS5 option.
That is true whenever you compare an undesirable feature, like a 3 speed manual or an open differential, with a very desirable feature, like an LT1 or LS5. Then rarity is more or less irrelevant.
However, as I stated earlier... Since both options, LT1 and LS5, have always been desirable, rarity tends to play a prominent role in their relative value.
I love the way you maintain your LS5 engine compartment, shown in your photo above. Same for Last Triumph. They look like incredibly nice Corvettes. Thanks to both of you for the photos.
-----------------------------
1979 L82 M21 FE7
Classic White / Doeskin
My car originally was a LS-5- not my pic- looks a little different these days-
A big block is like the girl you just take home.
As for handling, a big block with aluminum head, aluminum intake, aluminum water pump is very close in weight to an iron head small block.
Cooling. Good radiator, timing and carbs set right and the proper spoilers. No problem. My 496 will run at 180 all day in the FL heat and does not overheat in traffic.
And the torque is exhilarating. No downshifting needed. Punch the gas and you are there now. Mine break loose today on the on ramp flooring it at 50mph in 3rd.
If you will personally do the work to refurbish the car, just find the lowest priced car where you have interest and make sure it is not a 'rust bucket'. Then fix it the way you want it.
Last edited by 62corvette; Dec 14, 2020 at 03:54 PM.
What's important to me?
Bad-***.
Lots and lots of bad-***.
With an extra side of bad-***.
(As long as it was the same *** it left the factory with! LOL)
But, I can't afford either and the thread is not about my search, more just to learn a bit more about the cars I love and their place in history and the market.
I had a Callaway once who's *** was reasonably bad, in a hair dryer woooooosh kind of way, soon followed by smoke and drips of oil and warning lights ad infinitum.... was like being married to a psychopath with a crack habit.


















