When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
For what its worth putting heads on an other wise "un-know" base (short block) is like putting perfume on a pig, you dont know how long it will last with any of the said "ad on's" ? if you want power then buy or have your engine rebuilt for the power you desire. and dont forget to address the trans of choice you may have, to properly apply that new power to the ground. Just my $0.02
For what its worth putting heads on an other wise "un-know" base (short block) is like putting perfume on a pig, you dont know how long it will last with any of the said "ad on's" ? if you want power then buy or have your engine rebuilt for the power you desire. and dont forget to address the trans of choice you may have, to properly apply that new power to the ground. Just my $0.02
Not wrong. putting high flow small combustion chamber heads on a bottom end you know nothing about can be a huge mistake. However, 400 HP. is not impossible (at the crank) even with a 2 bolt main block. But not really much beyond that. But. correct pistons, new main and rod bearings. the correct cam and head combo. good intake manifold and the proper exhaust as well as a correctly recurved distributor all come into play.
And then the Story just begins. More horse power means more heat. bigger radiator, better fan or fans. more electricity to run electric fans. then everything behind the engine. trans? manual or auto? new torque converter? heavily modified trans to hold the power? U joints? Drive shafts and half shafts? Rear diff??? and this just scratches the surface. I've been tinkering on mine for many years.
Yes I can light em up all the way down the street. And yes, I keep finding the weakest link.
First off he knows he has flat top pistons . second installing good heads is not putting perfume on a pig .... Installing good heads on a block that's already knocking is putting perfume on a pig . there is no secret sauce on a SBC as the info is out there and been out there for years ..
I arrived at my 400 HP based on Comp cams own test of a XE262 , 348 horse power with 9.5 to 1 350 bored .040 and Dart SR (stock replacement ) cylinder heads , add Promaxx 183ccintake port that flows 250 cfm at .500 lift with 64cc chamber for 10.? and that's my recipe for 400 hp .... Hot Rod got 440 hp with the same test and AFR 195's (edit to add ) so I compute 400 easy based on that .... Yes I own a Moroso speed calculator for over 35 years and it comes out a 300 horse power RWHP but there's not a bone stock 300 hp or 350 hp Vette made that could run with my Vette as it sits right now
First off he knows he has flat top pistons . second installing good heads is not putting perfume on a pig .... Installing good heads on a block that's already knocking is putting perfume on a pig . there is no secret sauce on a SBC as the info is out there and been out there for years ..
I arrived at my 400 HP based on Comp cams own test of a XE262 , 348 horse power with 9.5 to 1 350 bored .040 and Dart SR (stock replacement ) cylinder heads , add Promaxx 183ccintake port that flows 250 cfm at .500 lift with 64cc chamber for 10.? and that's my recipe for 400 hp .... Hot Rod got 440 hp with the same test and AFR 195's (edit to add ) so I compute 400 easy based on that .... Yes I own a Moroso speed calculator for over 35 years and it comes out a 300 horse power RWHP but there's not a bone stock 300 hp or 350 hp Vette made that could run with my Vette as it sits right now
Does he know he has flat tops? I haven't seen that mentioned yet.
I suppose it's in the realm of possibility to get 400 HP out of a xe262 with the right heads, right exhaust and good tuning. If you look at the XE 268 it does no better than the XE 262 on Comp's dyno results. I suspect if you were to up the CR to 10:1 instead of 9.25:1 you'd see the 268 shine with the same heads. give it good heads and a 10:1 and you'd make much more peak power and better bottom end power without exceeding max dynamic CR. The XE 262 you're gonna have to keep an eye on the dynamic CR in order to not exceed pump fuel limits.
The performance of those two cams is so similar that the dyno's could almost be laid over each other with the set up they gave the cam to work with.
More duration needs more CR to work well.
I'm not a fan of the flat tappet XE series myself and would rather do it with a roller cam of similar specs. There are just too many guys who end up with flat lobes on that series for my comfort zone.
Hot Rod also noted less power with XE268 with AFR 195 also , I hear you on the flat tappet as my shop will never install another one , roller or nothing ( I run Schubeck's flat tappets in my Ford FE and the camshafts look brand new when you take it out even after years of use ). Ken Ellison has a new part two video on the recent lifter failure rate ...... OP stated in the middle of the thread he has flat tops