When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I would say things don't look right with the printing. The letters should align vertically from one line to the next and I'm not seeing that. It looks like it's got some authentic aging. There are other things I don't think are correct but maybe someone else will comment.
The tank sticker in the original post is not typical factory production The spacing is not consistent with original tank stickers and there are mistakes in the sheet such as options like the 427 missing in the the second the line where the engine designation is.
The sticker in question was presented along with other documentation on a car I was interested in.
Car is now sold but this may have put me off anyway so appreciate the feedback
The tank sticker in the original post is not typical factory production The spacing is not consistent with original tank stickers and there are mistakes in the sheet such as options like the 427 missing in the the second the line where the engine designation is.
Knew you would catch the missing 427.
How about the Positraction and Power Brake option lines reversed…..
Yours is a L36 not L71. L36’s didn’t have ‘427’ in the line in 1969. That’s why when you compare tank stickers they must be similar in most respects as well as time frame.
Does anyone know how this data was entered for the incoming orders that resulted in the tank sheets? I suppose it was a rudimentary database sort of thing on a room-sized computer (?) - Punch cards?