When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Didn't read the article but one of the big advantages of EFI (port injection, not CFI) over a carb is the use of a "dry" intake. While the carb requires a manifold that keeps the fuel in suspension in the air flow, this isn't a constraint for EFI. This enables the EFI manifold designer to better tune his manifold to make torque at a low or high RPM and not have to worry about the fuel wetting of the manifold and air-fuel distribution problems. The TPI has very long runners for low end torque that would be a disaster if carburated. EFI also enables the use of larger cams, more overlap, etc. because it doesn't rely on a vacuum signal to meter fuel like a carb. Also, by the very design of the carb it imposes a restriction to airflow which is necessary to meter the fuel flow. It relies on pressure drop to pull the fuel into the air-flow. EFI intake systems can be designed to have very low intake losses by eliminating this restriction.
I still like the "looks" of carbs underhood more than an EFI system, though.
Wow, that makes me pretty good about going with the SuperRam/383 combo I put in my Vette. I saw also in a magazine that Scoggin Dickey was offering a 383 topped with the SuperRam intake and a fixed Accel computer (so it's a bolt-in with no programming required)
Ya that super ram made some super torq, I got a HSR in my Formula now and it rocks for $, I have had a LT1 retro fit intake and stock tpi on the same eng and the HSR is the best all around of the 3.
I still like the "looks" of carbs underhood more than an EFI system, though.
You don't like the visual appeal of a Tuned Port? It is the coolest looking of all the EFI engines to me. Those long runners really make the wow factor irresistable to me!