When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Well after reading http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show....php?t=1075452 I rechecked my readings I posted earlier with one big difference I thought "dynamic" compression meant with engine running, you know dynamic versus static OOOOPSSS. In the Navy we call that a "GCE" (great conceptual error) anyway with coil wire off I cranked it over 5 times each cylinder and heres what I got
DRY / WITH 2 PUMPS OF 80 WEIGHT
I'm happy!
Okay next step is going to Kragen Auto picking up the leak down tester and give that a try. I'm happy so far and maybe all I'm looking at is new valve seals versus a total rebuild.
I thought that was a compression test. I thought with leak down you used shop air, put a set pressure in the cylinder and then measured how much was lost or leaked out giveing a leak down reading?
Numbers look OK. Your wet numbers are close to mine dry but mine is a fresh rebuild. You do have higher compression though so I would figure a rebuild of your engine would yield 170-180PSI.
The 15PSI difference between dry/wet concerns me. I need an engine guru to jump in here. 15PSI sounds like enough pressure to push oil around to me hence it may well be blowpast the rings as suspected. Anyone have thoughts on this?
From: Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean people aren't out to get me...
St. Jude Donor '09
Originally Posted by norvalwilhelm
I thought that was a compression test. I thought with leak down you used shop air, put a set pressure in the cylinder and then measured how much was lost or leaked out giveing a leak down reading?
From: Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean people aren't out to get me...
St. Jude Donor '09
Originally Posted by norvalwilhelm
I thought that was a compression test. I thought with leak down you used shop air, put a set pressure in the cylinder and then measured how much was lost or leaked out giveing a leak down reading?
No I'm hoping it means the rings are fine. Well no one has a leak down tester available to rent out. Hopefully next week the 2 units are back to the store from whomever is borrowing them and I can do the leakdown test. that will be the true indication.
Numbers look OK. Your wet numbers are close to mine dry but mine is a fresh rebuild. You do have higher compression though so I would figure a rebuild of your engine would yield 170-180PSI.
The 15PSI difference between dry/wet concerns me. I need an engine guru to jump in here. 15PSI sounds like enough pressure to push oil around to me hence it may well be blowpast the rings as suspected. Anyone have thoughts on this?
Cheers,
Pete
Pete there are so many unknown variables involved such as are the heads stock, honestly I never checked, 64 or 72CC, how thick are the gaskets, has the heads been ported whatever. Given I don't know this till I rip the motor apart I can't be certain of the readings I should be seeing.
From: Arlington Va Current ride 04 vert, previous vettes: 69 vert, 77 resto mod
Originally Posted by Cali,68,L-79
No I'm hoping it means the rings are fine. Well no one has a leak down tester available to rent out. Hopefully next week the 2 units are back to the store from whomever is borrowing them and I can do the leakdown test. that will be the true indication.
i thought the theory went that if the oil increases compression it is because it creates a small film on the cylinder walls indicating that the rings were not as tight or sealing as well as before....if the oil does nothing to incease compression then the problem is the valves
Well my theory, and it's just a theory, when you crank over the engine five times the oil pump will splash up to the botttom of the rings and it will drip down. Succeding turning over of the engine for the rest of the cylinders will continue to load the block with oil from the pan so there still should be some oil at the rings making any increase in oil say the 80 weight I shot in the spark plug hole insignificant. Maybe I'm just hopeful. Who knows.
10psi. I'm assuming that's a good thing. If the rings were bad than I should have seen a significant spike in PSI and I did not. Again the true test will be the leak down test. I wish someone locally had a leak down guage to borrow. I'm not paying $115 for something I use once.
From: Arlington Va Current ride 04 vert, previous vettes: 69 vert, 77 resto mod
Originally Posted by Cali,68,L-79
Well my theory, and it's just a theory, when you crank over the engine five times the oil pump will splash up to the botttom of the rings and it will drip down. Succeding turning over of the engine for the rest of the cylinders will continue to load the block with oil from the pan so there still should be some oil at the rings making any increase in oil say the 80 weight I shot in the spark plug hole insignificant. Maybe I'm just hopeful. Who knows.
i don't think so, but i hope i'm wrong for your sake...the bottom ring is and oil scaper ring its mission is to stop the oil from getting by it....the top rings are the compression rings thats why the oil you shot in there made a difference.