When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I am planning to replace the #5 and #7 intake/exhaust lifters when I replace the intake manifold gaskets with Fel-Pro Printoseals (one of my vacation projects this week). I have noted in several pubs that 'cam breakin' should be performed at 2000rpm for approx 15-20 minutes. Is this applicable for just two of the 8 cyl's or can this be performed for a shorter period?
I would do the normal 20 minute break-in. This allows the lifter and the cam to wear-in. The higher rpm's keeps the lifters turning so it wears-in evenly.
I would replace all the lifters at the same time. Something happened to cause the other four to go bad. And regardless of how many you change don't skimp on break-in. If you do you may as well put used lifters on a new cam 'cause you'll end up with the same results . Just my 2cents.
A question here ,,,,,,,,,,what is wrong with the two lifters you plan replacing ??
Geo
I'm getting some 'lifter' noise from that area of the valvetrain. My suspicion is one of the lifters has failed. I adjusted the entire bank of lifters/rockers today to 1 full turn after '0 lash'. Quieted down more but still getting some noise that I can actually feel as it 'ticks' through the valve cover. I intend to give the full valvetrain a good review before I pull any of the lifters BUT I have purchased the replacement Energizer Cam/lifters (same as the one I have in the engine) as a precaution.
I'm getting some 'lifter' noise from that area of the valvetrain. My suspicion is one of the lifters has failed. I adjusted the entire bank of lifters/rockers today to 1 full turn after '0 lash'. Quieted down more but still getting some noise that I can actually feel as it 'ticks' through the valve cover. I intend to give the full valvetrain a good review before I pull any of the lifters BUT I have purchased the replacement Energizer Cam/lifters (same as the one I have in the engine) as a precaution.
1 FULL TURN??? NO, NO,NO, no more than 1/2 turn after reaching 0 lash
Did you check your exhaust manifold/header bolts? Notorious for ticks.
Roy
I took it into my custom exhaust shop and they put the probe everywhere; no header/flange leaks (a good thing). I've gone to great lengths to solve this problem and that is where I started (using Earl's aluminum exhaust flange gaskets and copper collector gaskets). Valve train/intake gaskets are the final fronteir.
Spec for a non-anti pump up lifter is .060" of preload. (1” / thread pitch x rocker ratio) will tell you mathematically how much pushrod movement occurs at the adjustment nut. Using the smallblock stud pitch of 24 threads per inch and the stock rocker ratio of 1.5: 1” / 24(threads per inch) = .0416” per full turn, multiplied by the rocker ratio of 1.5 = .0625.” So, one full turn of the adjusting nut on a stud that has 24 threads per inch and a 1.5:1 rocker ratio will result in .060~ preload.
Spec for an anti-pump up is usually at .020" preload.
There is nothing wrong with setting the preload the way the engineers intended it to be. It doesn't matter whether you're talking old or new lifters.
And surprising no one has mentioned that the "break in" is for the cam lobes. You can put new lifters on an old cam and just drive the thing. It's done routinely and there is no break-in period in this situation.
Whether new lifters will help your valvetrain tick or not is another question and is anyone's guess. If the old lifters are bleeding down excessivly or are not feeding oil properly into the plunger, perhaps. If the lifter face is concave instead of convex, then you likely also have some lobe wear too and a new lifter won't fix that.
GM factory service manual says 1 full turn. Why do people usually recommend less than this?
BTW: I would be concerned that the lifter replacement is not going to solve the problem. Hate to say it, but pulling the cam (and likely replacing it) may be the thing to do...
(1” / thread pitch x rocker ratio) will tell you mathematically how much pushrod movement occurs at the adjustment nut.
Sounds like it's a simple math calculation using the rocker ratio. However that's not how it works when calculating how much the push rod end of the rocker moves when adjusting the rocker nut. When adjusting the nut the rocker pivots on the valve stem; both the nut and the other end of the rocker move.
Look at a 1.5 ratio rocker. The length from the push rod to the nut is 1 and from the nut the the valve stem is 1.5. It doesn't matter if the lengths are inches or feet. It's the ratio that is of concern. So in a 1.5 ratio rocker the over all length is 2.5. The far end of the rocker will move 2.5/1.5 (or 1.67) more than the nut. Use the 1.67 in place of the rocker ratio for the calculation.
Increasing the rocker arm ratio decreases the amount the push rod end moves versus the nut. For a 1.6 ratio rocker arm, the ratio is 1.625.
From: San Diego - Deep Within The State of CONFUSION!
Sounds like it's a simple math calculation using the rocker ratio. However that's not how it works when calculating how much the push rod end of the rocker moves when adjusting the rocker nut.
I think you need to rethink those math statements. Your both only half right. Regardless, he's over compressing the lifter which is causing the tick. And could lead to premature cam wear.
What you really need to do now is check for a bent Pushrod! In your other posts you've stated that you tighented 1.5x's past zero lash. If the Pushrods are straight reuse them. Next check the "old" lifter bottoms for wear. Lube them up and reinstall. But this time use the half turn past zero lash method. If nothing else, you'll get could practice before installing the new cam/lifter set. Same with the Intake post you have going.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.