When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
ive read other forums but i am still confused...
Can the brake proportioning valve or low pressure switch( whatever its called) be removed from my 75 saftly? Will it cause better or worse braking? Has anybody done this?
If it's working, leave it alone. This valve enables two wheels to have braking ability in the case of failure. Such as if you loose front brakes, then you still have rear brakes. This valve will turn on the brake light on the dash.
This is not a real proportioning valve. It is only a switch that indicates if the pressure is unbalanced between the two systems. I dont know why you would want to remove it, but it would make no difference.
If it's working, leave it alone. This valve enables two wheels to have braking ability in the case of failure. Such as if you loose front brakes, then you still have rear brakes. This valve will turn on the brake light on the dash.
It does just the opposite, If you loose the front brakes this light switch drains off part of the pressure the back would have received.
I have advocated getting rid of this light switch years ago. I removed mine and found an improvement in rear brake performance.
With this light switch removed if you loose one end of your brakes the other end still sees full pressure, not a reduced pressure.
When bleeding the system with this switch out you will immediatley notice the peddle feels firm even before completley the other end.
The only down side to this is the brake pedal feel will feel normal when in fact one end is bad.
I did this to my vet and 2 mustangs and everyone notice an improvement over running the valve.
Get rid of it.
Other them myself has anyone else here really done it, can comment first hand on what it does getting rid of it??????
This is not a real proportioning valve. It is only a switch that indicates if the pressure is unbalanced between the two systems. I dont know why you would want to remove it, but it would make no difference.
I agree it is a light switch but a light switch that drains off pressure in the sudden event of a failure. A simple test for those that have the switch.
While holding the brakes on have someone open a bleeder, any bleeder and see if your foot suddenly falls to the floor then tell me it doesn't make a difference.
I know that with the switch out the peddle will continue to feel firm. One end will still get full braking effort.
norval
i bypassed the valve/switch on my 67 galaxie.
Years ago, 1990, i had a rear leak and lost ALL brakes even pumping gave nothing.
NOW it has adequate brakes w/1 open bleeder.
the pedal is lower, but firm, and can lock the wheels.
see current topic http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...p?p=1550748066
in c2 section
Last edited by Matt Gruber; May 15, 2005 at 08:48 AM.
"i bought a new GM MC 5-19-76 for $16.85 for my 61. still works great.
in 2 other cars with so called dual braking, i've had complete loss of brakes(with just 1 leak)"
What does the MC come from, a truck? I've been looking for a disk brake master with a 1.25 bore that will fit our cars.
"i bought a new GM MC 5-19-76 for $16.85 for my 61. still works great.
in 2 other cars with so called dual braking, i've had complete loss of brakes(with just 1 leak)"
What does the MC come from, a truck? I've been looking for a disk brake master with a 1.25 bore that will fit our cars.
.
I thought a stock power master cylinder for our cars was 1 1/4 inch bore and the manual master was 1 inch????????
I have semimetalic pads with a new mc and brake booster , new front calipers and rebuild rears. it doesent feel like it has enough bite. the pedal does not have enough feel to it.
I have semimetalic pads with a new mc and brake booster , new front calipers and rebuild rears. it doesent feel like it has enough bite. the pedal does not have enough feel to it.
I would not hesitate to get rid of it. It does more harm then good.
I have semimetalic pads with a new mc and brake booster , new front calipers and rebuild rears. it doesent feel like it has enough bite. the pedal does not have enough feel to it.
This seems to be a controversial subject. Everything is a trade-off but Norval summarizes it very well IMO.. 'this device does more harm than good'. Sure there might be a possibility that you could lock up the rear brakes in severe situations without this device. However do you feel safe knowing that a single brake component failure anywhere in the system means total brake failure. We are all running 25+ or older parts and/or aftermaket brake components made by who knows. I want redundancy in the system. Mine will be coming out this week. Just starting to work out how to best do that.
how do you "join" all the lines together if you remove it?
Norval suggested to either obtain two brass blocks(front & rear) with whatever adapters required for your line/thread sizes, or to fabricate a single new block out of a piece of brass that keeps both front and rear isolated. The fabrication is not that bad, basically drilling holes and tapping with the correct brake line flare adapters. I just took my valve out tonight and will let you know what I end up doing. Tomorrow evening I am going over to Norval's shop, we are going to see if there is even an easier way by modifying the stock valve..as in sealing off the valve with a brass plug.
Norval suggested to either obtain two connecting brass blocks(front & rear) with whatever adapters required for your line/thread sizes, or to fabricate a single new block out of a piece of brass that keeps both front and rear isolated. The fabrication is not that bad, basically drilling holes and tapping with the correct brake lines flare adapters. I just took my valve out tonight and will let you know what I end up doing. Tomorrow evening I am going over to Norval's shop, we are going to see if there is even an easier way by modifying the stock valve..as in sealing off the valve with a brass plug.
I brought in my stock 75 valve today and will take it apart and see how easy it is to just drill and tape the existing block for a dry seal to isolate the front and the back. That would allow the stock brake lines to work and only involve a simple rebleeding of the brakes.
Norval,
There is a way to disable the proportioning section of the valve and still have it function as a differential pressure warning device (RED brake failure light). If you have the type of valve I described in an eariler post (2 attaching bolts mounted horizontally under the M/C), remove the rear brake tube from the valve. Remove the large hex shaped end plug it was screwed into (no parts will fly out). You will see a rubber stopper looking thing stuck in the end of the piston. Pull this piece out (I believe there is a e'ring holding it in with a small spring behind it. remove the spring also). Screw the large hex plug back in. Connect the rear brake line and bleed the system. The rubber stopper is the "valve seat" that causes the valve to proportion. Without it, it's just a junction block. I'm trying to get a hold of one of these old Weatherhead valves so I can take some pictures for everyone since there seems to be much confusion as what it actually does. Everyone just needs to be warned that removing the prop valve may result in stability problems in a panic stop.