When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I recall reading someone's post (Lars, most likely) discussing ported vs. non-ported vacuum for the vacuum advance. How do I identify the two? My carb is an Edlebrock replacement for the stock Q-Jet and has all the same ports as the Q-Jet plus a few extra.
From: Arlington Va Current ride 04 vert, previous vettes: 69 vert, 77 resto mod
well conventional wisdom says the one above the throttle butterflies is ported vacuum and the one below is direct vacuum....some times they are beside eadh other....easy way to tell is with a vacuum guage or i guess your finger....if it is "sucking" at idle it is direct manifold vacuum or non ported vacuum....if it has no "pull" at idle but does so when the car is at a higher RPM that is ported vacuum....
And when should one or the other be used for vacuum advance? I'm having some "bogging" issues when I stomp on it. Gonna play around with timing, springs, etc. I'm going to re-locate the advance hose as an experiment...that won't cost anything.
From: Arlington Va Current ride 04 vert, previous vettes: 69 vert, 77 resto mod
you need to read Lars papers and his posts on this he makes it all logical whenhe says it and its correct....read the post XE268h that is going on now he talks about the vacuum cannisters and ported and direct vacuum there....