When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: Arlington Va Current ride 04 vert, previous vettes: 69 vert, 77 resto mod
Comp Cam XE series POll
YOU HAVE MULTIPLE CHOICES PICK ALL THAT APPLY.
heres the rules, lets just make this a factual thread, If you have an XE series cam with first hand knowledge tell your story good or bad. please note grind number and if its in a SBC, BBC, hydraulic lifters or soild lifters. Remember at the bottom of the poll you can vote on if you would get another XE series cam....in my excitement of voting i forgot to vote that i would use another XE series cam.
IF YOU POST NEGATIVE INFO PLEASE TALK ABOUT IT IN A POST...
this will "validate" the poll info
I can see the % will be meaningless so we will need to compute them on our own...
i have an XE268h with 2000 miles on it in a sbc
Last edited by bobs77vet; Jul 2, 2005 at 06:24 PM.
I'm extremely pleased with my XE268.
No problems with the cam, response, tuning (especially after Lars laid hands on it ) or drivability.
So far I'm sold on them.
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Roller cams are great you don't p'off the neighbours when your revving the motor between 2 and 3000RPMs for half and hour and you don't have to worry about it over heating, springing a leak etc. interupting the break in prceedure. WIth a roller you just add oil and go and you will go faster too because of the lightr load in your wallet
My XE-268 was bery bery goot to me for a couple thousand miles or so. Then I wiped one of the lobes because I went with too much lifter preload. I will say with a great deal of confidence that my problem was not CompCam's fault.
I'm using a Lunati now, but only because the numbers are a little better for a TPI conversion.
Wiped out 5 lobes and lifters in 10 minutes using Comp Cam break in procedure exactly as written by Comp Cam, using CC cam and lifters. Single spring valve train, no second spring to remove for break in. Was told by CC tech people " BB chevy's are notorious for wiping cams during break in" I am not making this up. XE 268 H in 69 427 390hp motor.
From: Arlington Va Current ride 04 vert, previous vettes: 69 vert, 77 resto mod
Originally Posted by 69monzaredbigblock
Wiped out 5 lobes and lifters in 10 minutes using Comp Cam break in procedure exactly as written by Comp Cam, using CC cam and lifters. Single spring valve train, no second spring to remove for break in. Was told by CC tech people " BB chevy's are notorious for wiping cams during break in" I am not making this up. XE 268 H in 69 427 390hp motor.
thanks for posting.... heres the other guys who have had problems also
i didn't see that they posted yet. again my purpose here is put this all out on the table once and for all, and the chips fall where they may.
80texasc3...wiped two and installed a third one (he gets the brass ***** award )
73c34me..wiped one...
money pit had a failure on one XE and success with another
Last edited by bobs77vet; Jul 1, 2005 at 09:26 PM.
XE 268 in 350 SB 1.6 roller rockers....2,000 miles no problems.
I like the cam.....very "sporty" idle.....pulls good at 1200 rpm up. No low end torque issues with a 4 speed.
Dave 62
I suspect that this is a case of bad statistics. I don't know what the market shares are but it seems to me that CompCams sell a hell of a lot of cams compared to other companies. Maybe they've just got more hype? Anyhow, if more people use them, then obviously more failures are going to happen. (For instance, most people use Windows so... ok, bad example)
Good example: The authorities here in the Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill triangle have been targetting argressive drivers because two counties in the triangle are "among the top 5 most dangerous in the state." Well guess what, the only larger population area in the state is Charlotte and I bet it has at least 2 dangerous counties of its own.
I suspect that this is a case of bad statistics. Anyhow, if more people use them, then obviously more failures are going to happen.
-Chris
But as long as thread lives and people add to it, the better it will be. I would expect it to reasonable for 1 out of every 200-500 cams to wipe lobes very quickly. With a backyard do-it-yourselfer the amount that go bad should be higher versus having it put in by an experienced mechanic. In my opinion if more than 2% are having premature wear, that is signaling there is a problem somewhere. One thing the poll will show is there is a high rate of failure, but the big question is do they have a higher failure rate versus less aggresive cams.
Last edited by mandm1200; Jul 1, 2005 at 05:08 PM.