When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: All humans are vermin in the eyes of Guru VA
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran
Combustion chamber and piston dish shape
OK so I am building a forced induction motor, and since I am po' I tend to agonize over every little thing.
So as far as I can tell chamber development lead to the kidney/heart shaped chamber for increased power, economy, less detonation, and increased compression reliably. So what about the piston on the other side. I would assume that it would have as much to do with the flame fronts and whatever as the chamber does.
So my options are
1.) Cheap - D-shaped cup
2.) Not so cheap - symetrical reliefs
3.) Expensive - Asymetrical relief(like my chamber bigger relief for the bigger valve.
Any of the 3 options are OK if you are retaining proper quench clearance rather than putting the pistons down into the bore (0.040" piston top to cylinder head clearance.) #3 is the best solution but, any of the 3 methods will work better than a full "bowl type" dish on the piston top. Make sure the rings are 0.250-0.300" down too and go with 0.927X2.75 or 3.00" long piston pins NONE! of the 2.50-2.25" long normally aspirated "race" stuff if your going to put some boost in the motor.
From: All humans are vermin in the eyes of Guru VA
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran
Yeah I think I have been underplaying it. I think a solid roller cam to replace the hydraulic one, and move the redline up to 6800rpm or so with shift points around 6300 would do me a lot of good.
I wouldnt need to change anything except my cam really.
From: All humans are vermin in the eyes of Guru VA
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran
I guess I am just gonna have to spring for the JE pistons. Damn I really didnt want too but I cant find an alternative that has an asymetrical dish designed to mimic the fastburn chamber, and maintain quench.
The turbo guys on the turbo forum are disturbingly silent. Do I ask hard questions or something?
From: All humans are vermin in the eyes of Guru VA
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran
Originally Posted by Solid LT1
Any of the 3 options are OK if you are retaining proper quench clearance rather than putting the pistons down into the bore (0.040" piston top to cylinder head clearance.) #3 is the best solution but, any of the 3 methods will work better than a full "bowl type" dish on the piston top. Make sure the rings are 0.250-0.300" down too and go with 0.927X2.75 or 3.00" long piston pins NONE! of the 2.50-2.25" long normally aspirated "race" stuff if your going to put some boost in the motor.
OK what about pistons with a circular dish? Like diamond, arias, and Probe sell?
From: All humans are vermin in the eyes of Guru VA
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran
I am assuming that the standard deck height is 9.025
Wow
So a 3.48" stroke + 5.7" rod and a 1.56 compression height only gets me 9" so my pistons will be .025 down in the hole to start with. add a .041 standard head gasket and I am at an unacceptable .066 quench. so I need to lose about half that distance somewhere.
I can get a .027 thick Cometic MLS head gasket that takes me down to .052
I suppose if I decked the block to 9.010 I could get .37 quench which will wonderfully.
Here's what my piston from my 1200hp TT SBC427 looked like.
I already had the Dart CNC 18* heads from the engine's previous incarnation as a 12:1 compression NA engine, and I wasn't about to take the grinder to the CNC machined combustion chamber to enlarge them or go with a piston with a too short compression height - not good for combustion efficiency and not good for forced induction apps due to the ring location. 1.175" compression height works perfectly fine and you can safely locate your rings (as mentioned in an earlier post) although the oil ring will need a support but that's no big deal.. Besides, I beleive in the small, efficient combustion chamber to promote flame travel and uniform A/F ratio. In order to drop the compression from 12:1 to 8.5:1 I had to go with a fully dished custom piston from JE. There are some benefits to this design in that the cylinder pressure is applied more uniformly against the piston and the valves are greatly unshrouded, but you do give up some traditional quech area although you still ahve some around the circumeference of the chamber. Even so, you'll notice I still had to have a slight valve relief for the intake valve as I was running a 2.180" valve.
Full dish pistons like the ones in the photo leave some of the mixture unburn but, do help with piston cooling in a supercharged motor (or turbocharged engine.) The mixture uniformity and burning are much better with a "D" or assymetrical dish type piston. You can use anything you want but, I would go with the J&E pistons in my motor.
From: All humans are vermin in the eyes of Guru VA
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran
Originally Posted by Solid LT1
Full dish pistons like the ones in the photo leave some of the mixture unburn but, do help with piston cooling in a supercharged motor (or turbocharged engine.) The mixture uniformity and burning are much better with a "D" or assymetrical dish type piston. You can use anything you want but, I would go with the J&E pistons in my motor.
So a D-shaped cup even though it bears no resemblence to the chamber will burn fuel better?
But the full dish will keep the piston cooler avoiding hot spots.
As a question monty how much did the CV products pully system run you?
I don't recall exactly, and it appears to be something I forgot to document on my website, but they are not overly expensive. I plan on using them again on my TT LS7X 427.
From: All humans are vermin in the eyes of Guru VA
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran
Good deal. I am sort doing my turbo project on a budget. So I agonize over everything, and then compromise my agonization with what I can actually afford.
I did come up with a new top-shelf fluidampr off of ebay for a song. So I am happy there.
From: All humans are vermin in the eyes of Guru VA
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran
I can get wiseco pistons for 8.7 or so compression with rings and pins for 514 bucks. they have symetrical reliefs but I guess it will have to do. I will just save up some more money and have them ceramic coated by swaintech. that will help keep them cool.
also I think there is a TRW piston I could get but after I add in rings its already at the wiseco price.
Yeah I think I have been underplaying it. I think a solid roller cam to replace the hydraulic one, and move the redline up to 6800rpm or so with shift points around 6300 would do me a lot of good.
I wouldnt need to change anything except my cam really.
But all I want is 650hp.
all i can add is that your gonna have to be careful with the comp. ratio with a blown engine. youll want to stay around 9:1 or lower. as for the redline you mentioned, i cant see the need for the solid cam for the revs you mentioned. i have hydraulic cam and have to set my rev limiter on 7000 or it will grenade its self, it revs so easily. it was common place to run whole races with our dirt cars at 6500-6900 rpms, with hydraulic cams.