When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Just betetr gas mileage becuase your tires are properly filled longer. I might try it becuase I can buy it down the street and use it in my paintball tanks.
wonder if you put helium in your tire and did a burn out would it sound like donald duck?
So is it really worth $5 a tire to have to put air in your tires once every 4 months instead of once every 2 months? I don't see any real big benifit for a street application. (It certainly won't help your MPG)
I see two benefits - no oxygen and no moisture. Neither would be remotely noticeable on a street car. If your tires oxidize from the inside before you wear them out, you aren't driving nearly enough...
Your wallet will be 20 dollars lighter, and your gas mileage will increase accordingly. If you carry the 20 dollars around in the car in pennies it might make a difference
Seriously though, I'm offended when I have to put 25 cents into a machine to get REGULAR AIR, no way I'll spend 20 bucks.
if <20% of your volume escapes from your tires...what will happen to the tire pressure?
If the 20% O2 escapes and you continue replace with an 80% nitrogen mixture, won't you evenually end up with 100 nitrogen? OK, theoetically you wil never get to 100% but could get pretty close.
Oxygen gas (32 atomic mass) is larger then nitrogen gas (28 atomic mass), so if its diffusion that you are worrying about, using nitrogen doesn't seem to make sense to me. Don't forget that water is smaller then both of these (18 atomic mass). The inertness of the nitrogen may be prefereable to the oxygen, but I have to admit, I don't know all the chemistry that occurs in a tire. Basically to make a good decision on this subject we'd have to know how the diffusion coefficients based on the material of the tire.
If you keep your tires properly filled w/air ... nitrogen will NOT offer any gas mileage advantage over air ... actually your gas mileage w/ air does improve very, very slightly as tire "grows" & OD becomes larger ... nitrogen fills negate this effect ... w/nitrogen the pressures do not change as much so the tires do not grow as much. We use nitrogen in regional asphalt circle track cars to limit tires from growing; limits resulting tire stagger changes.
It's a certainty that the car mfg would fill w/ nitrogen if it improved mpg; even if any improvement were as little as less than half-a-percent.
Brochures claim 2% increase in mileage and 25% increase in tire life, improved safety from fire and environmental friendly. All the oxygen escaping from your tires is polluting the air.
If you get 150,000km from a tire with air you know get 187,500 with nitrogen.
It says right here in the brochure I have open beside the keyboard that all these things are true.
Brochures don't lie
Commercial air lines have used it for years, don't think they would spend the extra if there were no benefit......
The advantage to nitrogen in aircraft tires is no moisture and at 38000 to 41000ft that commercial aircraft fly at moisture would be hazardous to the tire when it comes in at 140 knots and the tire would come apart. I see no advantage of nitrogen in car tires. Just a way to take our money
If the 20% O2 escapes and you continue replace with an 80% nitrogen mixture, won't you evenually end up with 100 nitrogen? OK, theoetically you wil never get to 100% but could get pretty close.
It's close to 100% nitrogen. You don't add it to a normally inflated tire, an air inflated with normal air also contains water vapor.
nitrogen molecules are larger than air and therefore don't permeate through the tire so you don't have to check the rpessure as often, also it's "dry" so there's less pressure change with temperature. I say go for it.
I made a little mistake there, air obviously has to read oxygen as in O2 is smaller than N2
Oxygen gas (32 atomic mass) is larger then nitrogen gas (28 atomic mass), so if its diffusion that you are worrying about, using nitrogen doesn't seem to make sense to me.
Cripes, you're right twin turbo, that'll teach me to run my mouth without checking my values again. I should have said heavier. Nitrogen is larger physically then oxygen (17.3 cc/mol vs 14.0 cc/mol) (need to review my quantum mechanics again) so that could affect the diffusion. Although oxygen is denser then nitrogen, which also can also affect diffusion. Either way, I'm not sure filling your tires with nitrogen is worth $5 a tire.
I suspect the difference in pressure changes over temperature are mostly related to the effects of mositure in the tires.
Originally Posted by 72 stingray owner
.... Don't forget that water is smaller then both of these (18 atomic mass). ...
But remember that water is ionic and a highlypolarized molecule. It collects together in chains that mimic a larger molecule. Otherwise water wouldn't be a liquid at room temp. Also another reason water wants to expand so much when it turns to steam. If there’s moisture in your tires and it heats up and transitions to steam it’s going to increase the tire pressure more that without it.
But has anyone compared N2 and 100% dry air (like from a SCUBA tank)?
Cripes, you're right twin turbo, that'll teach me to run my mouth without checking my values again. I should have said heavier. Nitrogen is larger physically then oxygen (17.3 cc/mol vs 14.0 cc/mol) (need to review my quantum mechanics again) so that could affect the diffusion. Although oxygen is denser then nitrogen, which also can also affect diffusion. Either way, I'm not sure filling your tires with nitrogen is worth $5 a tire.
trw
I've been running it in the tires of my DD for a couple of years, it really works, I haven't had to refill at all and I check it regularly. It also helped a lot on the C5, before it would constantly whine about tire pressure on the german autobahn and when you let off some air the thing whines when the tires cool off...with the nitrogen the readings are much more stable and the alarts have stopped.
I suspect the difference in pressure changes over temperature are mostly related to the effects of mositure in the tires.
Also another reason water wants to expand so much when it turns to steam. If there’s moisture in your tires and it heats up and transitions to steam it’s going to increase the tire pressure more that without it.
How warm do you think the tires are going to get? Do they really get hot enough to steam the water? I realize that the increased pressure will accelerate this phase change, thus the temperature doesn't have to be 212 degrees F.
Also, is there enough water in the tires to get this reaction? With nitrogen and oxygen making up the lions share of the air, I can't imagine the water content being more then 3%. But given the correct conditions, it might be possible.
Good thread topic.
TT, good point. I don't generally argue with results.
Is anyone using nitrogen instead of air in your tires? I have heard that it decreases tire temps and keeps pressure longer. Is it worth the xtra 5 bucks?
I have not put it in my L82 76 simply because we have the front end apart - "HOWEVER" my daily drive is 140 miles round trip in a 98 LeSabre (sure ain't a Vette). I didn't see where you are from , but in OH TireDiscounters does free rotation, balancing and Nitrogen. I've bought 4 sets of tires from them and so far they have taken care of me. I've notice the tires lasting longer and don't seem to lose air when I travel for weeks at a time when the car sits at the airport. If you can get it with a program that I have, use it. But to pay for it, you can do just as well keeping you tires inflated properly.
How warm do you think the tires are going to get? Do they really get hot enough to steam the water? I realize that the increased pressure will accelerate this phase change, thus the temperature doesn't have to be 212 degrees F.
Also, is there enough water in the tires to get this reaction? With nitrogen and oxygen making up the lions share of the air, I can't imagine the water content being more then 3%. But given the correct conditions, it might be possible.
Good thread topic.
TT, good point. I don't generally argue with results.
trw
That's why they use it in aviation (rather than compressed air) Keeps ice from forming in the tires.
That's why they use it in aviation (rather than compressed air) Keeps ice from forming in the tires.
yeah, but the only time you have to worry about "steam" inside the tires is if the water condenses and STAYS condensed, which is not likely to happen when you're dealing with compressed air (which largely dries out under compression and expansion)