When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I remember when Norval tried the monoball upper ball joint. Did that have a different taper than the stock ball joint? Norval, did you have to ream a different taper or just a different diameter in the spindle?
I'm not going with a monoball but I noticed that Howe Racing has 4 bolt and 3 bolt style ball joints in their 'precision' line. I imagine the taper or size is different in some way between all the part numbers.
the 3 bolt howe one is the same balljoint that savitske sells, they are a direct replacement for the stock one. The 4 bolt mini balljoint only fits on upper control arms drilled for the 4 hole pattern and it too is a direct fit on the spindle. I don't remember what the inclination was, something like 1,5" per foot or so.
Twin Turbo ended up with mine. I did have to redrill a new bolt pattern at the time. The taper in the spindle is the same just the bolt pattern in the upper A arm was different.
I'm looking at the Howe joints and they have taller studs up to +0.5" from stock but not in the 3 bolt configuration for our stock arms. I was wondering if the taper was similar for some of the other applications they list.
Yeh, I got to looking at a parts house stack once, for a longer stud Bjoint and found basically nothing....4 bolts for about 3/8 to 1/2 inch height differance due to longer stud...
If you run soft springs and the designed travel of 7 inches at the wheel you will find the stud ball joints run into joint bind before going through this range of motion. The angle of the stud ball joint is just not large enough.
If you run soft springs and the designed travel of 7 inches at the wheel you will find the stud ball joints run into joint bind before going through this range of motion. The angle of the stud ball joint is just not large enough.
Do they bind in droop or bump? With the stock bump stops I only get 6.5" of suspension travel. Did you modify your stops?
Do you know if some of the other more common racing ball joints used (such as from 2nd gen Camaros or trucks) have the same taper? Norval, do you remember what application that 4 bolt mono-ball was intended? I see that Allstar/Lane automotive lists a large GM and a Mid-size GM mono-ball.
I'm looking at the Howe joints and they have taller studs up to +0.5" from stock but not in the 3 bolt configuration for our stock arms. I was wondering if the taper was similar for some of the other applications they list.
they have the 3 bolt ones in .5 longer also, you can get them through savitske or straight from them. A guy here in NL bought them through savitske ( http://www.scandc.com ) and good ole Grutzy ordered those also.
Not to highjack the thread, but could i just ask if there is any significant difference between the ball joints available with the 3 bolt pattern?
I got the jim meyers tubular arms which are drilled for the 3 bolts ones and i want to get the best ball joints available when i finally get to install them.
I'll also go ahead and hijack. Are there any good options to replace our spindles short of custom making something? I'm sure you guys have thought of this before but it would be nice to upgrade to something lighter and taller. Are there any racing series that use uprights that would fit our needs? I am thinking of making my own control arms and it would be convenient to use a more popular upright type and have easily available balljoints. Would I be better off starting from scratch? I know nothing about putting together a bearing package, but I guess it's time to learn...
StingrayDK, there is no difference in the 3 bolt designs other than the Howe ball joint. They offer longer studs but they don't actually have those studs in stock. I talked to them and they said they just don't have the demand to justify building them.
LiveandLetDrive, I have given thought to a fabricated spindle but haven't taken any action on it. I think you could make a lot of improvements in many areas. The problem I've seen with most racing spindles is their use of oddball (for street a car) hubs. Also, most spindles are circle track types and they are asymmetrical because the cars are only turning left. So that wouldn't work for us.