New Dragvette 6 link

http://www.dragvette.com/irs_build_up.htm
If only I knew this before I spent my tax return






Maybe I skimmed over it while looking at the product, but what is the difference in the 3 levels they are offering for sale there?
Last edited by Eddie 70; Jun 4, 2006 at 09:51 AM.
Last edited by Red 69; Jun 4, 2006 at 12:23 PM.
I wonder if it's strong enough though. That center plate looks like it only picks up 2 bolts on each side of the diff, & the top rear links just bolt to the same plate. The upper otbd posts look iffy. The lower otbd connections look good & beefy though.
At least there's something on the market now
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
However, I agree..the lower rods are probably 5/8th rods ends & sleeves, then the upper ones will be 1/2 rod ends and sleeves. A bit on the thin side if you ask me, I'd rather have 5/8th. The 2 bolt mounting on each side and the plate across the rear to support it from collapsing...dunno, in that case I would rather have a bracket that you can weld to the crossmember (and use those plates to bolt it up and position the bracket corretly, then weld in place) This only fits the iron diff setups so they all have the crossmember to weld to.
Also, the upepr rod end is not only small w/ it's 1/2 inch...it's also mounted in single shear on both sides and the rod ends is laid down flat on the trailing arm side, this means that the movement is not taken up by ball rotation but by misalignment clearane in the rod end. So, if you move the suspension too far for some reason it will side load the rod end and they snap off immediately. It would have been a lot better if the rod end was stood up and bolted through in double shear,giving better fixation and no need to rely on the misalignment angle.
Last edited by Twin_Turbo; Aug 9, 2006 at 06:53 AM.
Also, the upepr rod end is not only small w/ it's 1/2 inch...it's also mounted in single shear on both sides and the rod ends is laid down flat on the trailing arm side, this means that the movement is not taken up by ball rotation but by misalignment clearane in the rod end. So, if you move the suspension too far for some reason it will side load the rod end and they snap off immediately. It would have been a lot better if the rod end was stood up and bolted through in double shear,giving better fixation and no need to rely on the misalignment angle.
...
What do you think would be best to tie the upper links together? I think Norval & Brutus used the lower OEM strut rod bracket & modified it for the upper links. How did you work that out with the later batwing?
I really like how they've installed loops to contain a broken shaft or u-joint
Regarding the toe problem, why does it happen? Is it because the link attach points are not in line with the drive axles causing the trailing arms to "bend" while the links push & pull under compression/extension?
Even though it doesn't take care of the toe issue, it does address the camber change problem. I would still get this kit, but I would fix the weak links on the upper rods by rotating the upper TA rod end 90* & linking both upper links to each other.
?
At times it gets to me too
As for $900 that is plenty of money for a few pieces of steel and cheap rod ends and a few linkages.
Anyone can easily put their own 6 link together for about 1/10th the cost.
Anyone can easily put their own 6 link together for about 1/10th the cost.
.............if your name happens to be Norval or Marck
As for $900 that is plenty of money for a few pieces of steel and cheap rod ends and a few linkages.
Anyone can easily put their own 6 link together for about 1/10th the cost.
Thanks Norval













