C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Q Jet Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 12:55 PM
  #1  
sly vette's Avatar
sly vette
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,570
Likes: 1
From: Algonac Michigan
Default Q Jet Question

I was givin a Q Jet carb #17057287 and I know that it is for a marine application. I plan on rebuilding this carb. However the primary rods will have to be replaced I think. The numbers or letters in this case are DE and the jets are not easy to read but I think they are marked as 68 or 69. If this makes sense to anyone could you tell me if These are not proper for a 350 bored .060 over with headers alum 2101 Edelbrock and a Speed Pro cam, Oh hell I can't find the tech sheet for the cam. Anyway can anyone get me in the ballpark with the #s I have given so I can be assured that this car will stay running for break in?
I will get the specs for the cam later,I have to run right now.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 01:19 PM
  #2  
Kalway's Avatar
Kalway
Safety Car
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,071
Likes: 0
From: San Diego CA
Default

The primary metering rods should have numbers, not letters. My guess it that they probably say 48. You'll need a microscope to actually read the numbers on them. You'll need a jets ranging from 73 to 76 and rods from 43 to 48.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 08:18 PM
  #3  
BigBlockk's Avatar
BigBlockk
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 1
From: North Bend Ohio
Default

The DE rods are for the secondaries.

BigBlockk

Later.....
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 10:35 PM
  #4  
Kalway's Avatar
Kalway
Safety Car
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,071
Likes: 0
From: San Diego CA
Default

Originally Posted by BigBlockk
The DE rods are for the secondaries.

BigBlockk

Later.....
Why would there be secondary rods in the primaries, though...?
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2006 | 07:48 AM
  #5  
TopGunn's Avatar
TopGunn
Drifting
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 4
From: Somers CT
Default

I've just been working on mine changing the jets. My primary rod is marked 46K and I'm pretty happy with a .073 primary jet. You can get these from Summit made by Edlebrock p/n 1973, .074 would be p/n 1974, etc.

The secondary rods are always two letters, I believe you must be looking at those. Mine are CH. I can't say they are the right ones for my engine, I'm not happy with the performance yet but it might be something else. There are a TON of different secondary rods made

I switched from .074 to .073 primary and it made a noticable difference in performance. These might not be exact for your applicatioin but it'll get you real close.

I have a ZZ4 and 4 speed.

Bill
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2006 | 07:50 AM
  #6  
sly vette's Avatar
sly vette
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,570
Likes: 1
From: Algonac Michigan
Default

BigBlock is correct. I had misspoke as to which rods I was reading. I have everything soaking in laquer thinner now. when I get everything cleaned,I will post the correct numbers.
Thanks.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2006 | 11:31 AM
  #7  
sly vette's Avatar
sly vette
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,570
Likes: 1
From: Algonac Michigan
Default

O.K. After cleaning everything I find that the primary rods are 35 and jets are 69. Secondary rods are marked DE which translates to a0.0877 and they are medium length. any additional input with this new info???
Also I find that there is NO power valve spring and the spring that I assume holds he accelerator pump seal(blue in color) is broken. Should I continue to invest in this carb,or should I look for another??? Remember this is my first rebuild and I feel like I am getting in over my head.

Last edited by sly vette; Jul 8, 2006 at 11:37 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2006 | 01:15 PM
  #8  
TopGunn's Avatar
TopGunn
Drifting
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 4
From: Somers CT
Default

I'm not an expert on carbs but here's a little info:

Primary metering rod of 35 means it's a single taper rod .035 dia and since the carb ser no. begins with 170.. it means they are .080 shorter and not interchangable with double taper rods like the number I gave you that ends with a letter, so be careful when changing them if you do. I would leave them for now.

The main jet at .069 sounds too small to me for your engine, I would increase the diameter to around .073.

I'd start with that for jetting and see how it performs one step at a time. Your secondary rods are allot bigger than mine, .0874 at the tip vs mine at .0567. I would think a change might be in order here to but I'd start with the mains first. The secondaries are real easy to change later.

my .02 cents

Oh, and about the broken parts....bring the ser no to NAPA and you can buy a rebuild kit for it with new Acc. pump, gaskets etc. It's pretty easy to do.

Bill

Last edited by TopGunn; Jul 8, 2006 at 01:18 PM.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-6

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jul 8, 2006 | 02:26 PM
  #9  
Bob Onit's Avatar
Bob Onit
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,342
Likes: 7
From: Connecticut
Default

The carb you have is a 1977..
Be sure to order rods for 1975 and newer
I believe the pre 75 rods are of a different lenght.
EDIT oops......Top Gunn already explained this

READ THIS IS YOU PLAN ORDERING RODS FROM RDELBROCK

I ordered a set of primary metering rods from Edelbrock for a Quadrajet Im rebuilding
I wanted 0.42 rods so I ordered part #1942 which I thought would be a .042 rod....turns out that they are .041
This has to be the MOST SCREWED UP NUMBERING SYSTEM I have ever seen.... take a look..... Which is what I SHOULD HAVE DONE before I ordered them...on the bright side, their main Jet numbers do coincide with the actual size.

I now realize they dont produce a .042 primary rod but I cant believe the way they number their rods
______________________________________

Primary Metering Rods (Pairs)

Single Taper for Q-Jet Model 4MV (1974 & earlier). Dimension indicates maximum diameter of taper.

* (.035") ....#1936*
* (.037") ....#1937*
* (.039") ....#1939*
* (.041") ....#1942*
* (.043") ....#1944*
* (.045") ....#1946*

Primary Metering Rods (pairs)

Single Taper for Q-Jet Model M4M (1975 & later) and Edelbrock ....#1910. Dimension=maximum dia. of taper.

* (.048") ....#1941*
* (.050") ....#1943*
* (.052") ....#1945*
* (.054") ....#1947*
__________________________________

Last edited by Bob Onit; Jul 8, 2006 at 02:46 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2006 | 02:32 PM
  #10  
Bob Onit's Avatar
Bob Onit
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,342
Likes: 7
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by sly vette
I have everything soaking in laquer thinner now.
No rubber or plastic parts I hope
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2006 | 07:25 PM
  #11  
sly vette's Avatar
sly vette
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,570
Likes: 1
From: Algonac Michigan
Default

No rubber or plastic,and thank you Bob for sharing your experience.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2006 | 07:34 PM
  #12  
BigBlockk's Avatar
BigBlockk
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 1
From: North Bend Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Kalway
Why would there be secondary rods in the primaries, though...?
I figured he was mistaken about the rods so I wanted to make sure he knew that "DE" was a secondary rod designation.

As for this carburetor, it has a "truck" calibration. It will be about right on at idle, richer at cruise and lean at WOT. It was calibrated for a heavy vehicle operating mostly at part throttle.

For your application it will do best with a 72 to 75 main jet, something around a 45 main rod and a secondary rod that is somewhere in the middle between rich and lean like a DA. The DE rod is VERY lean.

BigBlockk

Later.....
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2006 | 08:39 PM
  #13  
Kalway's Avatar
Kalway
Safety Car
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,071
Likes: 0
From: San Diego CA
Default

69 jet with a 35 rod? Holy crap that's RICH. That's a 288 metering area. a 45 with a 73 jet would be 163. Being that this is an M4M, rods are a pain in the butt to get in the right size. IF you can find a 57 jet you could use your same rods and have the same metering area. However, I don't think you can find a jet that small so you'll have to find some primary metering rods between 40 and 50 in the k or p spec. Maybe olescarb can help on that.

You can get a power piston spring at www.carburetion.com
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2006 | 11:41 PM
  #14  
sly vette's Avatar
sly vette
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,570
Likes: 1
From: Algonac Michigan
Default

Thanks guys.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 01:28 AM
  #15  
BigBlockk's Avatar
BigBlockk
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 1
From: North Bend Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Kalway
69 jet with a 35 rod? Holy crap that's RICH. That's a 288 metering area. a 45 with a 73 jet would be 163. Being that this is an M4M, rods are a pain in the butt to get in the right size. IF you can find a 57 jet you could use your same rods and have the same metering area. However, I don't think you can find a jet that small so you'll have to find some primary metering rods between 40 and 50 in the k or p spec. Maybe olescarb can help on that.

You can get a power piston spring at www.carburetion.com
His engine would probably melt at WOT with a 57 main jet. Check that, it probably wouldn't even run long enough to get to the secondaries.

At WOT below 3500 RPM the mains are providing almost all of the mixture for the engine. The mixture at WOT, before the secondaries open, is dictated by the main jets and only the main jets. All of the usable main metering rods have the same power tip size (.026"). At WOT the metering rods are as far out of the jets as their going to get so you are running on the main jets only.

This engine would lean out so badly that it probably wouldn't be able to pull the vehicles weight long enough to get the secondaries open at around 2800 RPM. I would think there would be massive carburetor backfiring.

Besides, I believe the smallest main jet for the Q-Jet is a 60.

Edelbrock makes a race tuning kit for the '75 and later carburetors that could help with this. It is #1992.

http://www.jegs.com/webapp/wcs/store...tegoryId=10285

BigBlockk

Later.....

Last edited by BigBlockk; Jul 9, 2006 at 01:33 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 02:15 AM
  #16  
Kalway's Avatar
Kalway
Safety Car
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,071
Likes: 0
From: San Diego CA
Default

Originally Posted by BigBlockk
His engine would probably melt at WOT with a 57 main jet. Check that, it probably wouldn't even run long enough to get to the secondaries.

At WOT below 3500 RPM the mains are providing almost all of the mixture for the engine. The mixture at WOT, before the secondaries open, is dictated by the main jets and only the main jets. All of the usable main metering rods have the same power tip size (.026"). At WOT the metering rods are as far out of the jets as their going to get so you are running on the main jets only.

This engine would lean out so badly that it probably wouldn't be able to pull the vehicles weight long enough to get the secondaries open at around 2800 RPM. I would think there would be massive carburetor backfiring.

Besides, I believe the smallest main jet for the Q-Jet is a 60.

Edelbrock makes a race tuning kit for the '75 and later carburetors that could help with this. It is #1992.

http://www.jegs.com/webapp/wcs/store...tegoryId=10285

BigBlockk

Later.....
Forgot about the tip vs. jet size... That edelbrock kit won't help much, though. All of the rods are M rods which have an .032 tip size, not the .026 that we want.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 11:36 AM
  #17  
Bob Onit's Avatar
Bob Onit
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,342
Likes: 7
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by Kalway
69 jet with a 35 rod? That's a 288 metering area. a 45 with a 73 jet would be 163.
Hey Kal, how do you calculate this and more important what does "metering area" mean? and how do you apply this info when deciding what jets/rods to use?

Thanks
Bob
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Q Jet Question

Old Jul 9, 2006 | 02:29 PM
  #18  
Little Mouse's Avatar
Little Mouse
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,403
Likes: 95
Default

Holley, Think Holley.

Last edited by Little Mouse; Jul 9, 2006 at 02:32 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 03:51 PM
  #19  
Kalway's Avatar
Kalway
Safety Car
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,071
Likes: 0
From: San Diego CA
Default

Originally Posted by Bob Onit
Hey Kal, how do you calculate this and more important what does "metering area" mean? and how do you apply this info when deciding what jets/rods to use?

Thanks
Bob
Go to corvettefaq.com -> engine -> intake -> lars jet tuning chart
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 05:11 PM
  #20  
Bob Onit's Avatar
Bob Onit
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,342
Likes: 7
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by Kalway
Go to corvettefaq.com -> engine -> intake -> lars jet tuning chart
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:37 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-1
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-2
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-4
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE