When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
don't know what justins doing may be still scrathing his head looking
for the answer. the right way to balance a crank is internaly on the counter weights. to keep from spending money for new block
castings to clear bigger crank counter weights needed for long
strokes they took the cheap way out and added some balancing
in the flywheel and balancer, it works but not the best way to
balance a crank.
Last edited by Little Mouse; Jul 22, 2006 at 11:42 PM.
Do the 383 I hear talked about use exterior balance?
Depends on how they're built. Traditional style, using an acutal SBC 400 crank, yes. Using an aftermarket stroker crank, it just depends on the crank. I have a forged steel SBC 400 crank set up for 5.7" rods for my 400 build, it's internally balanced. From what I understand internal is better for high revving engines.
Internal the only way to go. When I had my 383 built I shipped the flywheel/pressure plate/clutch to have them all balanced together, that's what the builder recommended for a performance set-up. No vibration issues.
I don't really see the point in balancing an engine internally with the harmonic damper/flywheel and clutch in place.
I have my engines balanced internally without any of theese items, i usually use a fluiddamper anyway, and i have my clutch and flywheel balanced by themselves, that way i dont have to have it all rebalanced if i decide to add another flywheel/balancer or clutch.
I didn`t get a big buck 383. The way I understand it is the rotating assembly is balanced and then you add the dampener and external balanced flexplate. Thats the way mine is and I believe most crate engines. I have no vibration issues.