When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
BeeJay has just posted a thread indicating that the Wilwoods he installed are 44 lbs lighter than OE calipers.
With no other changes to his setup, how will he feel this lower unsprung weight? Will the ride be smoother due to less inertia at the axle resulting in quicker movement of the wheel or stiffer due to the same spring reacting to a lower weight?
BeeJay has just posted a thread indicating that the Wilwoods he installed are 44 lbs lighter than OE calipers.
With no other changes to his setup, how will he feel this lower unsprung weight? Will the ride be smoother due to less inertia at the axle resulting in quicker movement of the wheel or stiffer due to the same spring reacting to a lower weight?
i'm not a technician but just imagine having somebody to run with the only weight of shoes and socks and another running with shoes, socks and 5 kg attached to each foot, it's the same as running willwood and running oem calipers...
i have willwood superlight calipers all round and there is a massive unsprung weight saving there
... how will he feel this lower unsprung weight? Will the ride be smoother ...
The ride will be smoother. Force equals mass time acceleration. When the wheel/tire is deflected by a bump then the unsprung weight of the tire/wheel/brake/suspension components (mass) is accelerated into the sprung mass of the car. The less the unsprung mass is, the less the force is directed to the car (sprung mass). The less the force, the smoother the ride.
Conversely on a dip (or hole) a reduced mass will be accelerated more rapidly downward (by the force of the spring) keeping the tires in better contact with the ground.
Reducing the weight of the wheel/tire/brake disk has this effect also, but, in addition lighter weight wheel/tires/brake disks have less inertia to overcome and can accelerate the car faster.
If you are going to take weight off a car, the reducing the unsprung mass will have the greatest ride improvement effect with reducing the tire/wheel/brake disk gaining the most in performance.
I have the Aerospace Components front drag brake kit (Van Steel sells those) and it took 56 lbs off the front of the car.
My best 60' time went from 1.531 down to 1.466. I'd guess that this is about a tenth of a second improvement on your 0 - 60 mph acceleration..
Thanks, Mapman.
Since the rotor is unsprung, How do I reduce it's weight econimically? Drilling doesn't seem to remove much weight. VBP's alum hub and disk are about the same weight as a GM rotor.
So, what are the options?
The ride will be smoother. Force equals mass time acceleration. When the wheel/tire is deflected by a bump then the unsprung weight of the tire/wheel/brake/suspension components (mass) is accelerated into the sprung mass of the car. The less the unsprung mass is, the less the force is directed to the car (sprung mass). The less the force, the smoother the ride.
I should have read this before driving the car. I still have a smooth ride for a sports car, I got that when I switched to a glass spring, but I feel more. It must be a stiffer ride because certain squeaks and rattles in my car are happening at lower speeds. Let me drive the car for a few more days, and I'll report on the ride again. But the immediate impression is that the car is more comunicative, as if someone bumped my tire pressure up about 30psi. And no kidding, I noticed it almost immediately.