When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Here is a pic of a 68 fuel tank and you can see where the fuel return line gets attached, at the top of the tank.
I have asked the question many times, and asked some very knowledgeable folks, about the function of the fuel return line. So whatever the answer, whatever reason you give for the existence and function of the fuel return line, my follow up question is, OK, then why is a fuel return line NOT needed for a Holley carb, while it is needed on a QJet? So a holley can handle more fuel at idle than a Qjet? A holley can handle hot fuel?
I don't know why Holly says it isn't needed, but I wouldn't run a fuel system without it.
Just to carify, I am talking about how the 68 - 72 corvettes came from the factory, not the recommendations of the carb manufacturers. Every corvette that had a Qjet also had a fuel return line. In 68-69 the fuel return line split off from the fuel filter. 70 - 72 it came from the fuel pump. But every corvette that had a Holley (With the possible exception of the 71 LS-6) did NOT have a fuel return line from the factory. In 68-69 the Holley equipped vettes had no inline fuel filter, and in 70-72 they either had a different fuel pump with no return line or else it was plugged (I just don't know which it was).
Durango_boy, did you just plug or cap the return line at the tank? or near the fuel pump?
Thanks again
The return line, when I got the car, was plugged at the frame rail where the rubber line would attach to it. Since I was leaving the electric setup in place, and it has a shut off, I decided not to re-open the return line. If I were using any other setup I would have reinstalled it along with a new mechanical pump.
SIXFOOTER, sounds like you hit on the answer i was looking for: an orifice! i ran some numbers this morning and this seems plausible even though i don't have good physical properties of gasoline here. the orifice would be pretty darn small and looks like the return line would flow at a fairly constant rate for differing engine demands assuming the pump maintains a constant deltaP. (the orifice on my pump must have been clogged for me to not see any return flow as DARROW reported).
PRNDL great info. seems like i read somewhere that the Holley would hold the needle against the seat at a higher pressure than a qjet, but can't remember values. could something like that be one reason why there was no return line with holley's?
Those of us who are/will be running an electric fuel pump without a regulator could consider adding a branch with an orifice and use the existing return line. it's just a matter of sizing the orifice.
thanks all
You know...going electric is easy and cheap. A frame mounted bellows electric pump from JCW.com, $45 after shipping. Run a relay and a hot wire to the pump, switched by ignition. Simple. Then, when the key is turned on, the pump will prime the bowls for you, so when you crank the engine you already have fuel in the carb.
If it switches on or off automatically based on fuel usage, a return line isn't as important.
Orifice size is aprox. .065 the ID of the outlet to carb is apox. .240---so "no" valves--the fuel is given a choice -big hole or little hole-carb gets it first
Durango-you would appreciate a return line next summer to keep your fuel cool-also you really should put an oil pressure safety switch on your electric fuel pump-your family would thank you.
Durango-you would appreciate a return line next summer to keep your fuel cool-also you really should put an oil pressure safety switch on your electric fuel pump-your family would thank you.
Heh, good call, and I already have the link to order one. I liked the idea. I already have a manual cut-off switch, but want to add the pressure switch. The fuel temp I can live with because I usually won't drive on sweltering days. I like the AC in my Durango.
The largest hole is the intake,the next largest(the one in the bottom of can-.240)goes to the carb-the tiny hole .065 sitting on top of tube is the return.
Last edited by ...Roger...; Sep 18, 2006 at 08:39 PM.
Hey carb guru's, you all got me thinking about the return line. Mine is capped off also, I'm using a Edelbrock 1722 fuel pump, 6-7 psi..A Edelbrock 1813 800cfm carb and Edelbrock Torker II intake. Installed a vented gas cap, I would like to hook up the return, any ideas how?
Hey carb guru's, you all got me thinking about the return line. Mine is capped off also, I'm using a Edelbrock 1722 fuel pump, 6-7 psi..A Edelbrock 1813 800cfm carb and Edelbrock Torker II intake. Installed a vented gas cap, I would like to hook up the return, any ideas how?
Use the stock return line. If the pump is electric, buy a T for the fuel line to the carb. Make sure the T has a smalled outlet and use that to return the stock line on the frame. As long as the T is smaller than the diameter of the fuel inlet, the fuel will flow when needed unless there is an overage, in which case it will go through the return.
If you have a mechanical pump, it might have a fitting for a return line. If not, use the above method.
Last edited by Durango_Boy; Sep 20, 2006 at 10:41 AM.
The reason q-jets received the return line and Holleys didn't is, q-jets had a hot-start problem. When a warm enigne was shut down, the residual pressure from the pump would over-power the big needle and seat and create a flooding condition aggravated by underhood temps. Holleys, with their two N&S's didn't suffer from this malady.
The reason q-jets received the return line and Holleys didn't is, q-jets had a hot-start problem. When a warm enigne was shut down, the residual pressure from the pump would over-power the big needle and seat and create a flooding condition aggravated by underhood temps. Holleys, with their two N&S's didn't suffer from this malady.
Why wouldnt they use the same setup for both?With the idea that the return helped with cooling the fuel going to the carb,was the Holley less likely to suffer from perculation?Could this type of return starved the Holley since the Holleys came on higher perf. engines.
i think you'll need an orifice in the return line to maintain sufficient pressure at the carb; it doesn't look like the resistance of the return line alone will do it. 0.065 in dia is what DWncchs measured. by some rough calcs, it looks like it could be even smaller.
i think you'll need an orifice in the return line to maintain sufficient pressure at the carb; it doesn't look like the resistance of the return line alone will do it. 0.065 in dia is what DWncchs measured. by some rough calcs, it looks like it could be even smaller.
Yeah, , the smaller the better. Obviously don't choke it, but you just need to create a path the extra fuel can take.