engine tuning





Steve, welcome aboard!
I too have an 80 350cu in, brand spankin new edelbrock performerEPS intake, 600 cfm edelbrock performer carb, slightly increased cam & shorty headers to a Y pipe, free flow cat & 3" exhaust to the tips.
I just came back from the dyno. While thinking I would pull around 240 to 260 on the dyno because of the improvements listed above, I was quite shocked to pull 182rwHP, 3 consecutive tries...182
So, in order to bump the HP into a bit more of a performance catagory, I am planning on full long tube headers and 62 Edelbrock aluminum heads.
Hopefully these two alterations will finally let the air comming in have a decent place to go, thus increasing those anemic HP numbers.
Please keep in mind that the RWHP dyno takes off about 10-15% HP when you have an Automatic. So, yes HP at the crank would probably run 230-ish. But at the rearwheels with an Automatic, 182RwHP.





The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
AP





The short white secondary spring will get you an advantage and should help. The 600 cfm carb is smaller than what I usually run on an engine like that - I like the 750 on any performance engine in the 350-400 cubic inches range (and there are people here who will argue that one, but that's what I like to run). Yet, the 600 will give you a nice level of performance (heck, the NASCAR guys run 390's...).





BigBlockk
Later.....
Yup. And you spin the engine at 8,000-9,000 rpm. If you figure the 9,000 rpm number and knowing the horsepower they're putting out, you'll see that the engines are actually down a bit on torque due to the carb limitation. If you let those guys run 1150's, you'd see horsepower numbers simply staggering.







