C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Which Hyd. Roller Cam??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 10:00 AM
  #21  
69vettester's Avatar
69vettester
Thread Starter
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
From: FL.
Default

Originally Posted by jackson
Repeat once more ... better get some input from Brodix on the 1094 ... it don't look like a good choice for Al heads on street car ... also ... If GM 383 makes 9.1:1 SCR w/ 0.028" & 64cc ... it will NOT make 9.5:1 w/ 1094 @ 0.015" ... it'd be under 9.4:1. IMHO just not enough difference to be worth the trouble you may find.

If you MUST have at least 9.5:1 ... Maybe you could flat-mill heads about 0.040" ... that'd drop chamber to about 59cc ... then w/ a VR 5746 it'd make almost 9.6:1 SCR.
Ok Im convinced, the fel-1094 is going back to summit. Thanks for you and Motorheads strong opinions about it, I appreciate it alot.
I wont be Bolting the heads for 2 weeks so Plenty of time for more research on the subject.

Brodix recomends fel-1003, 4.166 bore .041 thick, Steel core laminate Pre-flattened steel wire ring.

Ill look up the VR 5746 gasket , and use that or the gm 10105117 Both are thinner and will bump cr , if only a hair, at least its in the right direction.

I wont be milling these heads anytime soon so Ill be fine with 9.1 or so cr , and the crane 112 lsa ,ad. dur. 284/292 , .508/.528 lift 1.5 rockers. Still spinning the idea to get the lift up to .542/.563 lift using 1.6 ratio rockers. I just dont know if that would send the profile up into an undesireable higher range for this street engine!

Im looking at the edl rpm 2201 too...(thanks Billysvette).
its 112 lsa , Advertised Duration 296/300, Lift .539/.548, w/1.5 rockers. that works well with the .575 max lift of the springs on these heads.

I should have the valve train list figured out tonight and get it all ordered , But until I do that, Im open to any advice, ideas or comments about which cam and rocker ratio to use.
Tom
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 10:42 AM
  #22  
gkull's Avatar
gkull
Team Owner
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 21,953
Likes: 1,445
From: Reno Nevada
2024 C3 of the Year Finalist- Modified
Default

IK 200 2.020 Intake 123 181 230 253 261
1.600 Exhaust 100 145 164 171 176


Very mild heads for a 383 roller motor. I would go for 1.6 to make them flow better. I'm also suprised at Brodix using such small lift and pressure springs.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 04:22 PM
  #23  
Billysvette's Avatar
Billysvette
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 6
From: Baltimore MD
Default

Originally Posted by 69vettester
Ok Im convinced, the fel-1094 is going back to summit. Thanks for you and Motorheads strong opinions about it, I appreciate it alot.
I wont be Bolting the heads for 2 weeks so Plenty of time for more research on the subject.

Brodix recomends fel-1003, 4.166 bore .041 thick, Steel core laminate Pre-flattened steel wire ring.

Ill look up the VR 5746 gasket , and use that or the gm 10105117 Both are thinner and will bump cr , if only a hair, at least its in the right direction.

I wont be milling these heads anytime soon so Ill be fine with 9.1 or so cr , and the crane 112 lsa ,ad. dur. 284/292 , .508/.528 lift 1.5 rockers. Still spinning the idea to get the lift up to .542/.563 lift using 1.6 ratio rockers. I just dont know if that would send the profile up into an undesireable higher range for this street engine!

Im looking at the edl rpm 2201 too...(thanks Billysvette).
its 112 lsa , Advertised Duration 296/300, Lift .539/.548, w/1.5 rockers. that works well with the .575 max lift of the springs on these heads.

I should have the valve train list figured out tonight and get it all ordered , But until I do that, Im open to any advice, ideas or comments about which cam and rocker ratio to use.
Tom

Tom ,i think me and you want the same thing,im going 383 ,with summits new aluminum performance heads.The edl-2201 would work perfect for us,if the specs are right on it.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 05:14 PM
  #24  
69vettester's Avatar
69vettester
Thread Starter
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
From: FL.
Default

Originally Posted by gkull
IK 200 2.020 Intake 123 181 230 253 261
1.600 Exhaust 100 145 164 171 176


Very mild heads for a 383 roller motor. I would go for 1.6 to make them flow better. I'm also suprised at Brodix using such small lift and pressure springs.
gkull, You are right, Ended up not going with that 1094 gasket, It was vague to me But Thats not the Best gasket for AL heads. No one Else liked the Idea anymore than you..

I got those Brodix IK200's Because of that spring. I looked up the spring in the Comp catalog its the cc987 and the same Comp spring as the .620 Max Lift one But set up Higher installed, so the Pressures are lower. Ive been wrong before,But Thats the way I see it anyway. I didnt want those large pressures so the Valve train would last longer. If I ever want a Higher lift than .575 , I think I can Just put some hard shims under that same spring and the Spring pressures will increase...My thoughts about it, I could be wrong. I only know Im not going to have a larger lifting Roller cam than around .550 for quite a while. I was Looking at alot of you Guys engines, They are Monster engines for racing, I think thats where the confusion comes with my Mild 383...Actually, I dont have alot of choices with the dished pistons in my 383. Flat top Pistons and Mill the heads, and I could probably get this engine competative at the race track...But not This year
Anyway Ill have all assembled and primed by the end of the month..Im just Hoping it Fires up and pumps oil at that point..Ill post pics as I go along..Thanks all for the comments..
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 05:40 PM
  #25  
jackson's Avatar
jackson
Le Mans Master
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 7,739
Likes: 630
From: Unreconstructed, South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by Billysvette
Tom ,i think me and you want the same thing,im going 383 ,with summits new aluminum performance heads.The edl-2201 would work perfect for us,if the specs are right on it.
Billy:
I just took a look at summits info about their Al head ... SUM-162111 sure do appear to be ALOT like Brodix IK200 but about $200 less/pr. If/when you get them ... will you please post details at CF? ... what if any clear indications they're actually Brodix?

Last edited by jackson; Nov 8, 2006 at 05:53 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 06:28 PM
  #26  
69vettester's Avatar
69vettester
Thread Starter
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
From: FL.
Default

Originally Posted by Billysvette
Tom ,i think me and you want the same thing,im going 383 ,with summits new aluminum performance heads.The edl-2201 would work perfect for us,if the specs are right on it.
Billy..Ill check Out those heads too..If they are Brodix IK200's under summits Label, I may be able to Use summit's Part's packages to see what they are recomending..May help me out getting the rest of the Valve train togeather..
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 07:11 PM
  #27  
MotorHead's Avatar
MotorHead
Race Director
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 17,676
Likes: 201
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Default

Before you shoot yourself in the foot lookup dynamic compression ratio on the net. A DCR in the 8 to 8.5 range is good for a high performance motor. You can go as low as 7.5DCR but I would not want to get near that.

I did a quick calculation for you setup with 9.2 CR and the cam you want to use. It comes in at around 6.7DCR because of the late intake valve closing at ~ 75deg ABDC. This means your motor will run like crap, sorry to be so blunt but I would like to see you happy with your new motor. You cannot run a big cam with low compression
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 07:40 PM
  #28  
Billysvette's Avatar
Billysvette
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 6
From: Baltimore MD
Default

Originally Posted by jackson
Billy:
I just took a look at summits info about their Al head ... SUM-162111 sure do appear to be ALOT like Brodix IK200 but about $200 less/pr. If/when you get them ... will you please post details at CF? ... what if any clear indications they're actually Brodix?

I already have them.What do you want to know?
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-7

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 07:44 PM
  #29  
jackson's Avatar
jackson
Le Mans Master
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 7,739
Likes: 630
From: Unreconstructed, South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by Billysvette
I already have them.What do you want to know?
Are there any casting marks (words/numbers) that indicate Brodix origin? ... same for any paperwork/packing that may've been with em? On the other hand, any of same that might indicate supplier other than Brodix?
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 07:49 PM
  #30  
69vettester's Avatar
69vettester
Thread Starter
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
From: FL.
Default

Originally Posted by MotorHead
Before you shoot yourself in the foot lookup dynamic compression ratio on the net. A DCR in the 8 to 8.5 range is good for a high performance motor. You can go as low as 7.5DCR but I would not want to get near that.

I did a quick calculation for you setup with 9.2 CR and the cam you want to use. It comes in at around 6.7DCR because of the late intake valve closing at ~ 75deg ABDC. This means your motor will run like crap, sorry to be so blunt but I would like to see you happy with your new motor. You cannot run a big cam with low compression
Motor head
which cam did you run to get the crap running engine? What do you think would be the strongest cam I could run?? Dur@050, Lift ??
Thanks
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 07:55 PM
  #31  
Guru_4_hire's Avatar
Guru_4_hire
Team Owner
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 62,198
Likes: 1
From: All humans are vermin in the eyes of Guru VA
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran
Default

Originally Posted by 69vettester
Motor head
which cam did you run to get the crap running engine? What do you think would be the strongest cam I could run?? Dur@050, Lift ??
Thanks
a 268 duration cam or smaller. 218 at .050 should do it.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 07:56 PM
  #32  
Billysvette's Avatar
Billysvette
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 6
From: Baltimore MD
Default

Originally Posted by jackson
Are there any casting marks (words/numbers) that indicate Brodix origin? ... same for any paperwork/packing that may've been with em? On the other hand, any of same that might indicate supplier other than Brodix?
All there is on the head is looks to be 3001-0507-0245.nice looking head for the price.I think summits new line is made by Pro Comp,I could be wrong.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 08:04 PM
  #33  
MotorHead's Avatar
MotorHead
Race Director
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 17,676
Likes: 201
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Default

Part Number:119831 Grind Number: HR-284-2S-12 IG

You will be much better off with the smaller of the two cams you choose in your first post Part Number: 119821 Grind Number: HR-276-2S-12 IG,
use 1.6 rockes
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 08:09 PM
  #34  
jackson's Avatar
jackson
Le Mans Master
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 7,739
Likes: 630
From: Unreconstructed, South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by Billysvette
All there is on the head is looks to be 3001-0507-0245.nice looking head for the price.I think summits new line is made by Pro Comp,I could be wrong.
Thank You!
Are you able & willing to send me a few pics via email? Especially inside where springs are?

Do the guide plates have any numbers/logo on them?, If so what?
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 08:18 PM
  #35  
Billysvette's Avatar
Billysvette
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 6
From: Baltimore MD
Default

Originally Posted by jackson
Thank You!
Are you able & willing to send me a few pics via email? Especially inside where springs are?

Do the guide plates have any numbers/logo on them?, If so what?
No numbers on guide plates ,just those numbers.I will take pics of them ,or try to tomorrow,my dig camera is not working right.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 08:24 PM
  #36  
LFZ's Avatar
LFZ
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 30,183
Likes: 313
From: Lake Norman NC
Default

i think you should run a 230/236ish cam on a 112lsa..that would be the biggest i'd go, and you'd definitely see the potential out of those heads too, especially if you got the lift up. Why are you so dead set on those springs? you could always get another set of springs if you go with a bigger cam...its not that much.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 08:05 AM
  #37  
69vettester's Avatar
69vettester
Thread Starter
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
From: FL.
Default

[QUOTE=69vettester]
I got those Brodix IK200's Because of that spring. I looked up the spring in the Comp catalog its the "cc987" and the same Comp spring as the .620 Max Lift one But set up Higher installed, so the Pressures are lower. Ive been wrong before,But Thats the way I see it anyway. I didnt want those large pressures so the Valve train would last longer. If I ever want a Higher lift than .575 , I think I can Just put some hard shims under that same spring and the Spring pressures will increase...My thoughts about it, I could be wrong. I only know Im not going to have a larger lifting Roller cam than around .550 for quite a while. QUOTE]


Redshark..I Posted the reason up above,Here it is again...
Ill check out cams in the range your advising

Last edited by 69vettester; Nov 9, 2006 at 08:35 AM.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Which Hyd. Roller Cam??

Old Nov 9, 2006 | 12:10 PM
  #38  
gkull's Avatar
gkull
Team Owner
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 21,953
Likes: 1,445
From: Reno Nevada
2024 C3 of the Year Finalist- Modified
Default

Originally Posted by 69vettester
I didnt want those large pressures so the Valve train would last longer. If I ever want a Higher lift than .575 , I think I can Just put some hard shims under that same spring and the Spring pressures will increase...My thoughts about it, I could be wrong. :
This statement could bite you. Valve float is very destructive. H-rollers are heavier than solid roller lifters. H-rollers can not have big spring pressures. i've been told that about 150 seat is max and that is how some people get 6500 rpm out of h-rollers. Some even get a little higher rpm with the use of rev kits which include an aditional spring above the lifter. 140-145# is the best. Thes are such low pressures in comparison to racing triple springs that valve train ware is not an issue.

My AFR 210 heads came with 140 pound .600 lift h-roller springs. Those springs would be more suited to what your trying to do. I took them off and put them in a box because I had a higher lift SR cam.

Adding shims under the spring increases seat pressure and decreases availiable max lift. I personally don't lift my vavles anywhere near the max lift of the springs. Like right now I have .800 max lift springs and my valves only open .656/.665. I did it to make the spings last longer and no valve float to over 8000 rpm
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 03:45 PM
  #39  
69vettester's Avatar
69vettester
Thread Starter
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
From: FL.
Default

Originally Posted by gkull
This statement could bite you.
I wont get Bit.. They are 125lb closed, 325lb open: The heads came with big red Tags "for Hydraulic roller cams-max .575 Lift. " I already new that and that they were perfect for where Im starting out with this low compression stroker engine.
I hear what your saying though..Comp and Crane have learned over the years to be very clear regarding the pitfalls with valve train components. And quite a few posts right here over 3-4yrs about Roller assembly failures and the reasons WHY
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 04:09 PM
  #40  
69vettester's Avatar
69vettester
Thread Starter
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
From: FL.
Default

Ive been considering which cam for a week..This is it ..unless I suddenly think Im insane and totally off the wall with what Im wanting to do..in which case

Heres the specs..
COMP
Part Number 08-502-8
Grind Number CS XR269HR-12
112LSA

Duration @050 218/224

advertised duration 269/276


Gross Valve Lift .528/.536 w/ 1.6 ratio rockers

Duration At 0.006 Tappet Lift 276


Comp. pro Magnum 1.6 full roller Rockers
Comp Roller lifters (for Factory Roller Cams)
Comp, steel, dual roller timing set (for Factory roller Cams).
and the rest of the oem 383 setup stuff.(spider, lifter blocks, factory cam retainer.

Now, the rest of the fasteners ,gaskets and Ill start Bolting it all Up
Thanks ALL..Your help was Invaluable..You kept me on my toes thats for sure

PS..if anyone sees anything bogus with this cam on my 9.1 maybe 9.2 to 1 compression 383 ..Let me know Pronto..I wont go crazy , Ill just go back to the drawing board

Last edited by 69vettester; Nov 9, 2006 at 04:21 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:07 PM.

story-0
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-2
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE