Difference in Steering Box's - 68/69-82 Manuall vs. Power
#1
Racer
Thread Starter
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Owensboro Ky
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Difference in Steering Box's - 68/69-82 Manuall vs. Power
What is the difference in steering box's for the 68/69 manuall and the 69-82 power. Is it just the pitman arm?
#2
Team Owner
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Redondo Beach, California
Posts: 39,565
Received 548 Likes
on
375 Posts
I converted my manual steering 68 to power steering, and the steering box didn't have to be changed. I've seen conversion kits for sale and there's no requirement to change the steering box. Very sure the steering box can be used for either application.
#3
Race Director
#4
Le Mans Master
As stated above, there is no real difference in the boxes. There is a slight difference in input shaft between 68-69 and 70-82. If you use the approptiate rag joint, either will interchange.
#7
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: Saginaw Michigan
Posts: 6,001
Likes: 0
Received 98 Likes
on
81 Posts
My early Chevrolet shop manuals (1968 and 1971) show the pitman shaft nut torque as 140 ft-lbs. A later Chevrolet shop manual (1975) and a 1966-79 Corvette manual specify 185 ft-lbs. My Corvette AIM sheets for 1975 and 1976 show a nominal of (185 ft-lbs.)
I would use the 185 ft-lb spec since I am quite sure that the gear and nut did not change through the years. Chevrolet must have been more comfortable with the higher torque spec.
Jim
I would use the 185 ft-lb spec since I am quite sure that the gear and nut did not change through the years. Chevrolet must have been more comfortable with the higher torque spec.
Jim
#8
Racer
Thread Starter
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Owensboro Ky
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm going with Jim's advice and torqing to the 185 ft/lbs.
#9
Tech Contributor
I torque them to 150 ft/lbs, I set them to 140 without a problem. 180 is a bit high so be careful you don't stress the box loading it up.