When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have a question about using a cam button on a street roller. Someone suggested using the crane rollorized type and using the standard chain cover, make a dent in it the size of the button, bolt it on, hit it more or less bac so that the play is take up.
I have used cam button of both solid and roller type.
The solid buttons I used with a standard cam cover and solid lifter cam.
With the roller cam, my cam cover was a billet aluminum and the button was the roller type.
With a roller cam, it is important to keep cam "Walk" (fore and aft movement) to a minimum. I don't think that I would dent the stock cover and hope that it was sufficient to control the cam "Walk".
Budgets are always an issue but there are some things that if not executed correctly will come back to haunt you. Use the correct cover for the button you choose.
Any suggestions on how to shim (also where to get which parts ?) the button ? BTW the cam plugs are already in so I cannot measure the play at the end of the cam.
Cloyes makes a nice cover with a built in roller button, makes it easy to set endplay also. Remove the smaller cover from the main cover, install the main cover on the block, push the cam all the way back into the block, put a piece of masking tape on the face of the roller button, put the smaller cover on, butt the roller button up to the cam, tighten down the button, remove the smaller cover, remove the masking tape and replace the smaller cover.
Here is the cover, says for long pumps but I used it with my short pump with a little grinding. Cost about $100
Cloyes makes a nice cover with a built in roller button, makes it easy to set endplay also. Remove the smaller cover from the main cover, install the main cover on the block, push the cam all the way back into the block, put a piece of masking tape on the face of the roller button, put the smaller cover on, butt the roller button up to the cam, tighten down the button, remove the smaller cover, remove the masking tape and replace the smaller cover.
Here is the cover, says for long pumps but I used it with my short pump with a little grinding. Cost about $100
Exactly how I did mine. A little grinding on the top two small cover screws, and two rear pump cover mount bolts will get ya the necessary clearance. The masking tape I used was .003 thick (I measured).... just enough for cam end play.
I used to set the roller cam roller buttons to .004 and screwed around with Cloyes **** poor excuse for a timing cover. I machined the upper top face off for water pump clearance. My blown 427 had a comp cams two piece.
Then my race shop enlightened me No freakin button. Just buy the best billet timing set sold. I happen to use Crane Cams billet. The chain is so tight and stays so tight. That for and aft cam movement is a thing of the past. I think that my 383 is Crane set is nearly 5 years old now and the last time I looked and the inner roller button face it appeared to have never been touched.
Just think about it. Strong chains only center the cam. No, back and forth. Forward motion is subject to braking "G force" It is not an issue on sub one "G" braking. 2-3 "G" braking get a cam button.
I used to set the roller cam roller buttons to .004 and screwed around with Cloyes **** poor excuse for a timing cover. I machined the upper top face off for water pump clearance. My blown 427 had a comp cams two piece.
Then my race shop enlightened me No freakin button. Just buy the best billet timing set sold. I happen to use Crane Cams billet. The chain is so tight and stays so tight. That for and aft cam movement is a thing of the past. I think that my 383 is Crane set is nearly 5 years old now and the last time I looked and the inner roller button face it appeared to have never been touched.
Just think about it. Strong chains only center the cam. No, back and forth. Forward motion is subject to braking "G force" It is not an issue on sub one "G" braking. 2-3 "G" braking get a cam button.
Someone suggested using the crane rollorized type and using the standard chain cover, make a dent in it the size of the button, bolt it on, hit it more or less bac so that the play is take up.
Well that's kind of the idea.. I used my stock cover and dimpled it slightly useing a large socket (at least 1 1/4") on the outside and a smaller one (slightly larger than the cam button) on the inside at the exact spot the button will hit. I put the cover in a press and slightly dimpled it. Trial fit it and slowly increase the dimple til you get the proper end play.
The dimple looks like the factory put it there and the money I saved I spent on something more inportant than a cover that does nothing for your performance.
I'm not sure what you are saying. My stock blocks have always had the full sha bang - Blue print and bal.. job. studded mains and heads. I even went all out on a roller cam 355 ci with splayed main caps.
The key is heavy duty roller chains that install so tight that you never have fore and aft movement.
The Crane billet timing sets that I have on both of my motors ............ I just really think that they keep the cam so centered that the cam does not move back and forth. I have the needle roller thrust bearing behind the cam sprocket also. Racers like Norval drill the block to give the chain a constant oiling
. . . The key is heavy duty roller chains that install so tight that you never have fore and aft movement.
The Crane billet timing sets that I have on both of my motors ............ I just really think that they keep the cam so centered that the cam does not move back and forth. I have the needle roller thrust bearing behind the cam sprocket also. Racers like Norval drill the block to give the chain a constant oiling
my chains have been good every rebuild
Interesting concept, but assuming that all chains will stretch and/or loosen over time, how well would this work for a street car that won't be torn down for 100k miles? How many miles have you had on the Crane chains?
Interesting concept, but assuming that all chains will stretch and/or loosen over time, how well would this work for a street car that won't be torn down for 100k miles? How many miles have you had on the Crane chains?
Roller cams can't be used in the same sentence as 100K miles. It has been my experience that people that go to the trouble of installing them are out there just beating their car to death. My worst year was three new motors. Last year was only two motors.
My 383 which has a billet Crane timing set is actually about 5 years old with prabably around 25,000 miles on the chain. The motor its self has been rebuilt once because of cam and lifter failure
Roller cams can't be used in the same sentence as 100K miles. It has been my experience that people that go to the trouble of installing them are out there just beating they car to death.
I won't disagree with your comment that most people use roller cams for, but I do disagree with "Roller cams can't be used in the same sentence as 100K miles". With tie introduction of Hydraulic Roller cams, Hydraulic Rollers are gaining popularity for street engines, and will be expected to run upwards of 100k. I have ~100k on my 350 flat tappit now, and when I rebuild it next year, I will go with a Hydraulic Roller. Not everyone is building an engine to scream down the 1/4 mile path.
Jim
I won't disagree with your comment that most people use roller cams for, but I do disagree with "Roller cams can't be used in the same sentence as 100K miles". With tie introduction of Hydraulic Roller cams, Hydraulic Rollers are gaining popularity for street engines, and will be expected to run upwards of 100k. I have ~100k on my 350 flat tappit now, and when I rebuild it next year, I will go with a Hydraulic Roller. Not everyone is building an engine to scream down the 1/4 mile path.
Jim
Hydraulic roller cams are standard equipment in most new v8's. They are designed to run well over 100,000 miles trouble free. The price of a cam button compared to the cost of installing a retro roller and a performance rebuild I would think this is a no brainer. Use a cam button as the manufacturer recommends. If I was going through 2 or 3 motors a year I would be looking at doing making some changes in my build process or at least installing a rev limiter at a sane rpm setting. If I had to rebuild in less than 25,000 miles because of cam and lifter failure I would look at the cause of that failure and might come to the conclusion that I should have installed a cam button to minimize cam walk. JMHO.
High end pistons have tiny 1/16th inch rings. They are on the down hill slide long before 20K miles.
On the other hand if you drive your h-roller like a little old lady. You are probably not jumping on the brakes at over 1 "G" either. Also lighter springs for h-roller would make a good billet chain last a long time. Solid big springs and lobes are harder on the chain.
If I was going through 2 or 3 motors a year I would be looking at doing making some changes in my build process or at least installing a rev limiter at a sane rpm setting. If I had to rebuild in less than 25,000 miles because of cam and lifter failure I would look at the cause of that failure and might come to the conclusion that I should have installed a cam button to minimize cam walk. JMHO.
My worst motor year was cause by being too trusting. TCI 450 hp big block handling 700R4 and a 355 ci nice rebuild using KB hypereutectic pistons. Both of these items are bogus products. No where on the KB package indicate that they rpm limited or should i say feet per minute limited to about 7000 rpm with a 3.480 stroke motor. The TCI 700R4 tranny just plain sucked. They last only a few days each. I blew out two of them in a very short period of time and one also caused the motor to far exceed 7000 rpm and the KB pistons failed. It also probably didn't help that I was driving 150 or so mph for a long period of time and then decided to floor it.
Motor number two that same summer was a budget 355 all forged short block with comp cams XE-274 cam. I strapped on my big heads and single plane. i had the tranny figured out by getting an Art Carr 700R4 and a 4.11 year end with a high stall (3800) After a few hundred 1/4 mile runs with slicks that motor was trashed. That is when I decided to start building my own 383 motor at home. Everyone of those companies out there is out to make a buck. That is fine if they would deliver what was promised
Virtually all GM production cars & lite trucks with pushrod motors have hydraulic roller lifters & thin ringpaks.
Consider GM MY96-up iron head vortec 90* 4.3V6 & 5.7V8 ... they have OE hydraulic roller lifters and OE 1.5mm, 1.5mm, 3mm ringpaks ... and they typically run many miles over 100K while maintaining great compression & oil control ... and when torn down show remarkably little lifter-lobe wear & remarkably little bore wear.
Common hi-po ringpak is 1/16, 1/16, 1/8 ... that's about 0.062, 0.062, 0.125.
That OE 1.5mm ~ 0.059", 3mm ~ 0.118" ... same as how many aftermarket hi-po pistons are configured.
There is a real force that drives roller cam both front & back ... the effect of drag produced by oil pump that's transmitted through helical distributor-cam gears ... both ways ... acel & decel ... the tighter the distributor gear endplay is, the more pronounced that effect. Newer LSx motors don't experience similar pump-distributor drag effect ... NO distributor and oil pump driven directly off crank. Retrofit rollers should use both a good set & a button.
I didn' want to start a discussion about to or not to use a roller. Fact is that I wanted a motor that could do 7500 to 8000 rpm. This calls for some pretty strong springs and those springs cannot be handled by a flat tappet. So I had to go to the roller type, like it or not. BTW I built what is known as a short stroke, long rodded engine (that is a 400 ci block bored 0.03 over with a 3.250" stroke crank and oliver 6.250 " rods in them, all the rest to match)
Point that I'm asking about the cam button, is that I don't think a rollorized button needs any clearance at all. Normal buttons rub against the the timing chain cover and thus need the space for oiling reasons I would think. The rollorized item doesn't need oiling since the top part stays put and the lower part can roll. That's why someone suggested taking up all the clearance and essentially avoiding any cam walk. Plus, if there would be any kind of heat expansion to consider, the cover itself is more than flexible enough one would think
I didn' want to start a discussion about to or not to use a roller. Fact is that I wanted a motor that could do 7500 to 8000 rpm. This calls for some pretty strong springs and those springs cannot be handled by a flat tappet. So I had to go to the roller type, like it or not. BTW I built what is known as a short stroke, long rodded engine (that is a 400 ci block bored 0.03 over with a 3.250" stroke crank and oliver 6.250 " rods in them, all the rest to match)
Point that I'm asking about the cam button, is that I don't think a rollorized button needs any clearance at all. Normal buttons rub against the the timing chain cover and thus need the space for oiling reasons I would think. The rollorized item doesn't need oiling since the top part stays put and the lower part can roll. That's why someone suggested taking up all the clearance and essentially avoiding any cam walk. Plus, if there would be any kind of heat expansion to consider, the cover itself is more than flexible enough one would think
Any thougths on that ?
Yves
Friend of mine thirty yrs ago I shared a shop with took a 400
block and a 327 large journal crank with special main bearings standard
5.7 rods and a 1rst design chevy off road cam, thing ran great.
I take cheap chrome cover and add a few modifications. Where the button hits the cover I use a slug of stainless and weld it to the cover. This spreads the load out and makes this area more rigid. I also add a hole with a plug so with the cover on I can measure the end play using a dial gage.
I also weld double nuts on the bottom of the cover so the bolts comming up through the oil pan never strip these threads.
The cheap replacement covers are actually quit rigid to begin with .
I didn' want to start a discussion about to or not to use a roller. Fact is that I wanted a motor that could do 7500 to 8000 rpm. This calls for some pretty strong springs and those springs cannot be handled by a flat tappet. So I had to go to the roller type, like it or not. BTW I built what is known as a short stroke, long rodded engine (that is a 400 ci block bored 0.03 over with a 3.250" stroke crank and oliver 6.250 " rods in them, all the rest to match)Yves
You've built what's essentially an old style cup motor ... they're still running approx same bore-stroke-rod length ... and cup motors turn well over 8K for hours on end ... and every cup motor has solid FLAT tappets ... back then and this season. Real good materials, lotsa fine polish & perfectly indexed lifter bores.