When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Has anyone put rear mounted twin turbos on a C-3? With the spare tire out there is a lot of room back there. They say fiberglas springs can't6 be near heat ,but except for that it looks good for space.
Last edited by msb184; Apr 1, 2007 at 12:31 AM.
Reason: content
It isn't bad for the price, but there are alot more exceptions to consider in addition to the effects of heat on the composite spring. Compared to a traditional near-engine turbo configuration significant heat energy loses occur resulting in loss of efficiency and increase in turbo lag. Read any turbo theory and design book and you'll realize that the STS system goes counter to nearly every "best practice". With that said, it's relatively affordable, easy to install, and does result in a good increase in performance, but it will never match a properly designed turbo system, everything else equal.
It isn't bad for the price, but there are alot more exceptions to consider in addition to the effects of heat on the composite spring. Compared to a traditional near-engine turbo configuration significant heat energy loses occur resulting in loss of efficiency and increase in turbo lag. Read any turbo theory and design book and you'll realize that the STS system goes counter to nearly every "best practice". With that said, it's relatively affordable, easy to install, and does result in a good increase in performance, but it will never match a properly designed turbo system, everything else equal.
Be careful what you say here..I have received a lot of flak for saying the exact same thing.
i saw this kit installed on a c5 on horsepower tv. they claimed that the turbos being further away from the engine decreased temperatures. and i dont understand the lag issue. exhaust doesnt slow down in the pipes, and this kit also elimates the mufflers, so i dont see the problem
i saw this kit installed on a c5 on horsepower tv. they claimed that the turbos being further away from the engine decreased temperatures. and i dont understand the lag issue. exhaust doesnt slow down in the pipes, and this kit also elimates the mufflers, so i dont see the problem
What is easier to pressurize? A golf cart tire or a semi tire?
i saw this kit installed on a c5 on horsepower tv. they claimed that the turbos being further away from the engine decreased temperatures. and i dont understand the lag issue. exhaust doesnt slow down in the pipes, and this kit also elimates the mufflers, so i dont see the problem
Heat is what does the work in a turbocharger system. You want to retain as much heat as possible. The further you have to pipe exhaust gasses to the turbos the more heat you lose and the more time it takes for them to get there. Thus, more lag.
These systems are for people that arn't smart enough to design a proper turbo system.
exhaust gasses do slow down, as temp goes down the molecules are less excited and require less space (think of people standing next to each other vs. the mosh put @ a metal concert LOL) this means that as the volume goes down it also slows down. Hot gasses travel faster than cold gasses over a pressure drop as the pressur drop is the driving force and hot gasses, needing more room, have a higher pressure.
Be careful what you say here..I have received a lot of flak for saying the exact same thing.
Yeah, he's talking about me, but the discussion (flak?) was over whether or not a rear mount was a viable option for the average hot rodder, Monty's answer suggests it's definitely worth consideration.
Do you want to get better power out of the engine you have, or do you just want to add a turbo? If you want to add power, nitrous is probably the best bang for the buck...and you could put your pressure tanks under the gas tank! If you add a turbo and put it in the rear, who will know? If you can't see it, would it still be cool?
I have toyed with the idea of a turbo(s), I'm a big fan of that form of forced induction and have done it before (not rear mount) with impressive results. But since I have a big block I'd like to keep all the auxiliary accessories and not have to rearrange the front end, all the under-hood space is pretty much used up. I know the rear mount sacrifices efficiency due to heat loss but for a big block C3, the rear mount seems the least intrusive, simplest and, to me at least, most obvious solution. And hey, it's a short trip to the rear! I know this ruffles the feathers of some turbo purists, but if you look at it another way, how much heat potential are you loosing with no turbo vs. a rear mount?
Coolness factor, well you may not be able to see them but you can still say you've got about 750hp at the crank, that's always cool.
the topic of the rear mounted turbo (sts) comes up in the c-5 section all the time. there are several members that have these and they are putting down some very impressive hp numbers. also the lag that everyone talks about isnt really that big of an issue on a large cube v-8. we have instant tq for the most part. it is more of an issue on the smaller ricer motors. there are better designs out there and theory of turbo design is debated all the time, but it is fact that this system does work very well. do a search in the c-5 sections and there are some vids of these systems.
how much heat potential are you loosing with no turbo vs. a rear mount?
but how much money are you keeping in your pocket? The thing is, why not spend and X amount of money and use that one something that's designed to work at or near the highest efficiency vs. just sticking it where it's convenient and it works..somewhat.
There's a video on youtube where they do that fidanza car, they totally rig the dyno test to start at a much higher rpm by downshifting....they have some bogus explanation for it there but in reality it's there to hide the fact that the turbine doesn't spool up sooner otherwise
Last edited by Twin_Turbo; Apr 2, 2007 at 03:16 AM.
Hey shafrs3, build a setup like mine. I did it for the same reasons, didnt want to lose all the acessories. I want a nice cruiser type car that I can drive on long trips.