C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

V0705ABT Engine Pad Stamp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 04:34 PM
  #1  
jihrie's Avatar
jihrie
Thread Starter
8th Gear
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Marana AZ
Default V0705ABT Engine Pad Stamp

I've been prowling around the forum for quite sometime, while I restore/ rebuild/ repair a 1970 C3 coupe. Nothing fancy, but a nice driver.
My question:
I have an engine pad stamp that nobody - Yeah, I've tried the NCRS-has been able to decipher. All of the engine and realted component casting numbers match, but this stamp is driving me nuts.
If anybody can give me a clue, I'd appreciate it:
Its stamped V0705ABT, on a 300 hp 350 SBC block casting 3970010, dated May 1970, heads # 8927186 dated April 1970.
VIN 194370S411559.


Thanks
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 06:17 PM
  #2  
stingr69's Avatar
stingr69
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,455
Likes: 1,482
From: Little Rock AR
Default

Are you saying the VIN derivative is stamped on the block? If not, it might not be from that car.

I do not have my references handy BUT keep in mind that most of the books we car guys have are for CARS. Info for heavy duty truck chassis or marine applications are harder to locate.

Try "1980" rather than "1970" and see what you come up with. That might be a newer block with some much older heads.

-Mark.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 11:54 PM
  #3  
Mike Ward's Avatar
Mike Ward
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 15,892
Likes: 42
Default

I can't find a specific ABT, but most AAx or ABx or ACx etc. codes are low HP, 2 barrel school bus or light truck applications.

Sorry.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 02:53 AM
  #4  
standup's Avatar
standup
Drifting
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 2
From: New Zealand
Default

I'd say this is a re-stamp...apart from the fact that ABT doesn't seem to be a known suffix code....the alpha numerics look too straight, too long across the pad, and too evenly spaced between the head and the water pump....also the font is different and the font size is too big.....

Your stamp pad should look like this:



What did the NCRS people say ? Do you have anything from previous owners that would indicate a rebuild ?

BTW, the same thing happened on my old small block....someone stamped a bunch of numbers there but they didn't mean anything....

Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 10:29 AM
  #5  
jihrie's Avatar
jihrie
Thread Starter
8th Gear
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Marana AZ
Default Engine Stamp Pad

Everyone,

Thanks for the replys.

There is no VIN derivitive on the pad, just V0705ABT. This is installed in a 70 vette I bought, stored in a warehouse from a guy I never met. I knew there was a numbers problem when I bought it, and the price I paid refelected that.
The storey is that the block was rebuilt, and decked. The machine shop may have restamnped the block with an ID reflecting the original engine; V for Flint, 0705 for a July 5, 1970, or 1980, or 1990 re-build date, and ABT as the initials of the machinist. This suposedly was to identify the work performed in case warranty work was later required. BUT, I have several good contacts in the automotive bussiness, and nobody can verify any of this. The protecto-plate and related warranty docs, shows the car was delivered in Miami Fl, but that was a dead-end too. No window or tank sticker.
The car runs well, everything works, and the engine is strong, so no real complaints, just a mystery stamp pad. It has a TH400 auto.
Also, the pad is just a rectangular block extending forward from the right-side head, not the longer, curved plate I see so commonly. Any one know the reason for different pad sizes? Also, I understand GM moved the VIN to the oil filter area in 1970, but I can't find anything there either. I understand it may be the wrong block - July 1970 post-dates the build date, just wondering if anyone ever heard of an ABT suffix. I have a spreadsheet, showing the build suffix, and application for just about any 350 SBC ever built, ABT just isn't there for a 3970010 cast block. The NCRS didn't have any answers either, at least several months ago. I plan to retry. I'm a member, and have the same references they do. It's old-time experince I'm lacking, and was hoping someone out there may have an idea.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 10:31 AM
  #6  
stingr69's Avatar
stingr69
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,455
Likes: 1,482
From: Little Rock AR
Default

Originally Posted by standup
I'd say this is a re-stamp...apart from the fact that ABT doesn't seem to be a known suffix code....the alpha numerics look too straight, too long across the pad, and too evenly spaced between the head and the water pump....also the font is different and the font size is too big.....

Your stamp pad should look like this:



What did the NCRS people say ? Do you have anything from previous owners that would indicate a rebuild ?

BTW, the same thing happened on my old small block....someone stamped a bunch of numbers there but they didn't mean anything....

His pad looks to be a later style where this picture is the early 70's style, that is one reason I suspect 1980 rather than 1970.

I doubt it is a restamp. Why bother if it isnt even close. I do not see a VIN derivative which leads me away from a car block and leads me to marine or some other commercial application. As I said before, the commercial chassis used passenger car blocks with suffixes that are not listed in our "matching number" type reference books. We don't have a lot of data on those applications. Heavy trucks and boats did not have the same rules about VIN stamping as light trucks and passenger vehicles.

-Mark.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 11:02 AM
  #7  
Mike Ward's Avatar
Mike Ward
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 15,892
Likes: 42
Default

Originally Posted by jihrie
Also, the pad is just a rectangular block extending forward from the right-side head, not the longer, curved plate I see so commonly. Any one know the reason for different pad sizes?

........Also, I understand GM moved the VIN to the oil filter area in 1970, but I can't find anything there either.......
The rectangular stamp pad first appeared on the 0010 blocks in the late 70's- IIRC, '78 maybe? This dates your block to this time period, at the very earliest. The details of the stamp pad V0705 -assuming that it's not a restamp-, means that it was assembled in Flint MI on July 5th, but does not indicate in what year. Are there traces of the original broaching marks?

Look on the rear flange of the block to get the casting date. This will narrow down probable year of assembly.

Ref, the movement of the VIN stamp, this is not correct. The VIN 'stayed put' until at least the end of C3 Corvette production.

The lack of a VIN stamp on your block might mean that is was simply an over the counter replacement engine built for the ABT application, which as I posted earlier is probably for a light truck/school bus.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 11:44 AM
  #8  
c69vete's Avatar
c69vete
Drifting
20 Year Member
Active Streak: 120 Days
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 65
From: Kissimmee fl
Finalist 2021 C3 of the Year - Modified
2017 C3 of Year Finalist
Cruise-In VIII Veteran
St. Jude Donor '07
Default

Originally Posted by stingr69
His pad looks to be a later style where this picture is the early 70's style, that is one reason I suspect 1980 rather than 1970.

I doubt it is a restamp. Why bother if it isnt even close. I do not see a VIN derivative which leads me away from a car block and leads me to marine or some other commercial application. As I said before, the commercial chassis used passenger car blocks with suffixes that are not listed in our "matching number" type reference books. We don't have a lot of data on those applications. Heavy trucks and boats did not have the same rules about VIN stamping as light trucks and passenger vehicles.

-Mark.
I was told that the later 0010 blocks that were not the hi tin/nickel content had the rectangle pads as shown in the original pic. If true, then this block could be 80 not 70. It could possibly be a two bolt main also, but if it was a truck motor then most likely a four bolt.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 01:23 PM
  #9  
Artsvette73's Avatar
Artsvette73
Drifting
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,991
Likes: 3
From: Piscataway NJ
Default

1978 ABA 350 LF5 160hp 2bbl C60/ School bus
1978 ABB
1978 ABC
1978 ABD
1978 ABF C60
1978 ABH C60/ Impala
1978 ABJ C60
1978 ABK
1978 ABL
1978 ABM

No ABT from my recorces. I have a CLY that I can,t find either
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 11:52 AM
  #10  
jihrie's Avatar
jihrie
Thread Starter
8th Gear
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Marana AZ
Default Pad Redux

Thanks all, for the help.

After review, consideration, and a few beers, it looks like the original block was replaced after 1978 with something from the marine or stationary engine line. The NCRS guys said basically the same thing. As all of the other casting numbers on the heads, manifolds, carb, distributor, etc are matching a 1970 vette, I assume there was a block failure, and the short-block was repaced with what-ever was available. I have 150 psi compression, and I'll check whether it's a 2 bolt or 4 bolt main, but it runs pretty good for a motor-boat engine!
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 03:43 PM
  #11  
Solid LT1's Avatar
Solid LT1
Le Mans Master
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,727
Likes: 38
From: Fremont CA
Default

You block is a "small pad" block that wasn't introduced until about 1978 or so. If the seller said the car was numbers matching, HE LIED!
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To V0705ABT Engine Pad Stamp





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:00 PM.

story-0
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-1
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-3
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE