Concept One Power Steering Box
I was close to buying the jeep box kit from Corvette Steering, but I like the idea of eliminating those adapter plates. I'm wondering which is easier to install, and which one has more clearance height wise on the inboard side.
Thanks!
I had many conversations and emails with Concept One, and decided to order the kit. So, hopefully I can provide everyone some good feedback in a few weeks. Unfortunately, I think I will have to have a header pipe cut and relocated about 3/4". Stay tuned......
YOu also set the plate into the frame and this gives about 3/8th to 1/2 inch more clearance then stock.
This is easy to do with the motor still in the car. Just remove the header and there is lots of room. You can even find a pitman arm to fit.
YOu also set the plate into the frame and this gives about 3/8th to 1/2 inch more clearance then stock.
This is easy to do with the motor still in the car. Just remove the header and there is lots of room. You can even find a pitman arm to fit.
I just installed a rebuilt steering gear from them, it is first rate, as well as the rear spring and disks I got from them.
Last edited by FRE3DOM; May 16, 2007 at 11:04 PM.
anyway, that's just my 2 cents.
Last edited by FRE3DOM; May 16, 2007 at 11:17 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I realize some people have a problem shortening the steering column, but I think if anyone believes that is going to save you in a severe front end collision, I would suggest otherwise. If you are belted in, you would not come near the steering wheel. If it came far enough back to hit you in the seat, I would think you would have much worse things to worry about then the steering column having an extra 1.5" of travel.
I'm certainly not an engineer, so I am curious to here your thoughts with some support. I am in the process of installing this box, so if there is some great danger (not associated with the steering column being shortened) I would appreciate the feedback. Thanks!
laughing now, as you head towards that tree at 85 mph
. A stock kit would be infinatly preferable to this "Piece from Frankenstiens lab", because the fact is, all the piece is, is a stock standard steering gear off an 68 to 82 in the first place.,,, uuhh,,, nn,,, No.Just my 2 cents.
This "jeep box" is an alternative to the stock system and eliminates all those leaky hoses and clutter and allows you to turn the wheel with more ease.
The Steeroids kit has been debated on here for a long time. Use the search function and you'll see why people get away from the stock manual/power steering systems and go to the Jeep Box or Steeroids. And most on here haven't been too pleased with the craftmanship of the steeroids kit.
I for one went with the corvettesteering kit but am not pleased with the adapter plates at all. If I could do it over I would order the same it without all the adpater plates and holes drilled and do what Norval did and weld a plate onto the frame to stiffen that already weak area, strengthen the bond of the steering box and give me more header clearance.
I'd like to see pics of this Concept One box when you get it and your install. Good luck
You blokes are at opposite ends of the spectrum here. I'm disappointed by the references to "Frankenstein" and "shortening the shaft", as they are misleading.
The Concept One box uses a NEW standard Delphi 600 (??? from memory) steering box, with a longer Pitman shaft to clear the chassis. The housing therefore has to be lengthened proportionately and this is done, according to discussions I've had with them, by standard (and safe!) engineering methods. The extension is sleeved AND welded.
As for shortening the shaft, remember that these columns are COLLAPSIBLE, and the inner part is just pressed or (softly) hammered up into the outer housing, about an inch or so. Nothing wrong there.
Look up their website and then make an educated comment about their products instead of misleading, if not incorrect, comments.
So Witz, keep us posted on your conversion and supply photos, as I am very keen to get one of these boxes. However, due to the distance involved, I would like to hear some feedback from some of you guys who have fitted them before I part with my Australian dollars.
Regards from Down Under
aussiejohn
I wouldn't install that thing on my Vette, did you read the part about shortening the steering shaft? if you need power steering and yours is a manual, use the stock conversion kit from Fastcorvette: http://www.fastcorvette.com/Steering.htm and live to tell about it. These guys make real parts.
I just installed a rebuilt steering gear from them, it is first rate, as well as the rear spring and disks I got from them.
Responses:
"The point is to NOT use the stock dinosaur-tech power steering system..."
"And those cockamamie u-jointed shafts used to hook up a rack and pinion system aren't from "Frankenstein's lab?"
"Not sure what lab they come from but it is better than whatever lab those crappy OEM C3 steering system came out of". <Apperently this guy doesn't like C3 engineering,, it's "Crappy"
"That would be the Saginaw state-of-the-art steering lab, circa 1955
Thanks for the info, it is very informative, now that I undrestand the box better, I stand by my original comment. But It's just a GUT FEELING, A Jeep box has no place in a sports car, < gut feeling, and I would never put one in my Vette <true, simply because of the unpredictability of it, I wouldn't trust it. but that's just based on a gut feeling. I would get a tight stock rebuilt system, espiecilly for a Vette as kick azz as Witz's, that's one mean machine. JUST MY OPINION, thats all.
Link: http://www.conceptonepulleys.com/steeringgear.htm
Last edited by FRE3DOM; May 19, 2007 at 03:28 AM.
I would prefer to go with a rack system however if I were to go this route I'd rather go front steer and of course no one makes such as system because it would require a NASCAR type short rack and notching the front cross member for the steering shaft. TwinTurbo is working on this as a one off project.
I had many conversations and emails with Concept One, and decided to order the kit. So, hopefully I can provide everyone some good feedback in a few weeks. Unfortunately, I think I will have to have a header pipe cut and relocated about 3/4". Stay tuned......





Big differences are that it incorporates 4 attachment points vs the 3 in a C3. Also, it's a bit longer on the input side due to the spool valve being there (thus requiring the column to be collapsed a bit).
The bigges improvement is that it gets you away from the slave-cylinder assist and gives you a torsion-bar based assist. It should improve the steering feel of the car.
As for the Concept One box, I'm scratching my head a little, so I'll rely on this input from Jim Shea
The one for the 1955-57 Chevrolet is a modified 600 gear with a welded long barrel gear housing and a special pitman shaft.
The other gear that they are advertising for mid '60s and up muscle cars is also the Saginaw 600 gear this time with a Nascar housing. Note the four mounting pads on the gear housing. The four pads are dictated by Nascar for cars racing their circuit. That gear should bolt right into older GM muscle cars using just three of the pads.
A third version of the Saginaw 600 gear is the 1999 through 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee power gear. This gear has still another design gear housing and components. It somewhat matches the gear layout in a C2/C3 Vette. It has been adapted by Corvette Steering Service to fit. Some individuals such as Norval have successfully integrated it into their Vettes.
The flaming river rack is a pretty slow manual-only rack (despite their claims that it's "fast"). What I like about it is their use of a subframe which has a better chance to provide adequate lateral stiffness. I have no idea how they implement an intermediate shaft though.
And as for the Flaming River electric power steering, there is no way I would ever even think about putting EPS on my Corvette. EPS has far too many details to expect decent performance and feel out of an aftermarket setup.












