When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I was looking at the exhaust system on my '75. It appears that the previous owner put on a 2 1/2" dual system. The OD seems to be about 2 1/2 or a little bigger. Is that a 2 1/2" system?
My real question is about the bends. This system has a very reduced size bend over the axle. In addition to being quite a bit smaller, it has a length-wise dimple that is pressed inward. It the strangest and ugliest bend I have ever seen. Clearly it is not anywhere near 2 1/2" during this bend. Does this type of restriction reduce my exhaust to an equivilant of a 2" system? Or does it not really matter beacause it is near the muffler which restricts flow anyways.
I have a Dyno Super Turbos that flows about 400 CFM. Does anyone now what a 2 1/2" pipe flows at? What about a 2" pipe? That may give me some answers about whether or not to replace the bent pipe with something more professional and effective.
If you have a stock 350 in place, then that bend is probably not going to hurt you much. It does bottle neck the exhaust though, and the gains of having a 2.5" system are lost because of it.
Drive the car to a local muffler and exhaust shop and have them look at it. They may be able to cut out the bends and put up some new better flowing bends.
While you're at it, have them install a pair of Magna Flow mufflers. Trust me, you will LOVE them.
Something doesn't sound right about your system. Yes, it sounds like a 2 1/2" diameter but I've never heard of the pipes going over the rear axle. On a Corvette they go under the differential. I'd like to see a picture of that. I wouldn't have thought there's enough room to run the pipes over the halfshafts.
Something doesn't sound right about your system. Yes, it sounds like a 2 1/2" diameter but I've never heard of the pipes going over the rear axle. On a Corvette they go under the differential. I'd like to see a picture of that. I wouldn't have thought there's enough room to run the pipes over the halfshafts.
I had a new set of 2 1/2" duals installed this past Friday, replacing a 2" set, and the pipes go under the rear spring in the center of the car. Also, I watched the muffler shop bend the pipe for the stock fit and the bends were minimal and did not reduce the diameter that much, if at all. The only 2 places that had a radical bend was at the front (from the exhaust manifold to start the pipes to the rear) and at the back (from the rear springs, up to the mufflers).
I too would like to see the picture of the pipes going over the rear axle.
Those are mot what is called "Mandrel Bends" which is what you need. That said, with a mostly stock motor at anything less that full throttle it will not reduce your delivered HP any. Hot One is correct, the exhause has to run under the differential and then Up to the mufflers.
Keep in mind, those posted flow numbers are Maximums, which means Max throttle.
My apologies folks. They are routed under the spring and take a turn to the outside, then up, then flat again to join the muffler. It is these three bends that concern me, especially the last one. The car has headers, so no bends up front.
The engine is an L-88 427, so I am hoping to get as good of a flow as I can. Should I try rebuild this with aftermarket bends? I am able to weld so it shouldn't be too difficult. I just don't want to do this if it doesn't make a real impact.
If you've really got an L-88 then you might seriously consider stepping up to a 3" system. My motor is just a little 'hotter' than an L-88 and the 3" system I ran really does the motor well. When we did the chassis dyno we were very impressed how much power I was putting to the rear wheels going through a full exhaust. For reference, I'm running coated headers going into a 3 1/2" collectors (I think the header tubing is 1 7/8"). Then the exhaust goes down to a full 3" through the original cross member, to an x-pipe, and then out to DynoMax Ultra Flows with 3 1/2" tips. Sounds awesome, great power, and actually not very loud at cruising rpms. I'd highly recommend something similar for your car. Here's some pics:
If you've really got an L-88 then you might seriously consider stepping up to a 3" system. My motor is just a little 'hotter' than an L-88 and the 3" system I ran really does the motor well. When we did the chassis dyno we were very impressed how much power I was putting to the rear wheels going through a full exhaust. For reference, I'm running coated headers going into a 3 1/2" collectors (I think the header tubing is 1 7/8"). Then the exhaust goes down to a full 3" through the original cross member, to an x-pipe, and then out to DynoMax Ultra Flows with 3 1/2" tips. Sounds awesome, great power, and actually not very loud at cruising rpms. I'd highly recommend something similar for your car.
Very nice system. I agree- a 427 deserves a 3" system. I've got a 427 CI small block & I'm working on a 3" mandrel bent system by Magnaflow. Is your crossover custom fabbed or off the shelf? Looks nice. Also, what material is your system-i.e. is it stainless & if so, what type?
I recently ended up having to have Headers and a new Exhaust system put on my 81. I asked for an H pipe to included but the Shop did not believe in either X or H pipes for 350 engines? They also installed what they called Corvette Road Muffers? My question is - should have another shop install either an X or H pipe? and what the heck are corvette Road Mufflers? They do sound pretty good when WOT and quite at cruise.
I recently ended up having to have Headers and a new Exhaust system put on my 81. I asked for an H pipe to included but the Shop did not believe in either X or H pipes for 350 engines? They also installed what they called Corvette Road Muffers? My question is - should have another shop install either an X or H pipe? and what the heck are corvette Road Mufflers? They do sound pretty good when WOT and quite at cruise.