When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm looking to gain some information to determine which heads would be better for me. I'm not planning on anything right now, but maybe in 6 to 8 months or so.
My question is which cylinder heads do you think are better? AFR 195's or GM Vortec's.
I have a brand new GMPP 350 290 horse 4 bolt main, so I'm sure my bottom end is strong. Quite honestly I'm not that happy with it. It doesn't seem to have much more power than my original engine (190 hp!!!)
I'm open to all suggestions about cams and intakes, as well. Right now I'm running an Edelbrock SP2P intake and a 750 QJet, and I'd like to stick with the carb if at all possible.
afr's are the best 23 deg heads on the market.. however if you dont plan on changing out your bottom end i think the vortecs would be better because they come with smaller cumbustion chambers (64cc) while the afr's smallest chanber is a 72 cc ( i think... )
Jonny
Nope, you can get 64cc AFR heads. You have to decide what you are going to build this engine to. Up to 400hp the Vortecs will work fine and will be cheaper. Over 400 you'd best be planning correctly.
Nope, you can get 64cc AFR heads. You have to decide what you are going to build this engine to. Up to 400hp the Vortecs will work fine and will be cheaper. Over 400 you'd best be planning correctly.
I'd think for somebody, using a stock 2-bolt/junk-rod/cast-crank/cast-piston short-block, that'd be kept to less-than 6000 RPM, vortecs would be fine, but if the internals can take it, and you plan to buzz the snot outta it, a large-volume, 'traditional'-port head might be best.
P.S. - I believe a recent issue of Chevy High Perf featured a build-up of the 290 HP crate-motor, using GMPP FastBurn heads, a 270H cam, RPM Air Gap intake under a 650 cfm Holley carb that made 385 HP/400+ TQ.
I have the AFRs (64cc 220s) and am very happy with them. 383 with 11:1 and a healthy cam it's well over 500hp, but does spin to 6500rpm which is probably more than your short block is going to be happy with for any length of time.
But, keep in mind the exhaust port height is higher with the AFRs so could cause some greif (it did for me). We also found the intake did not quite site right and had to be milled. Not sure if that was the intake or the heads.
afr's are the best 23 deg heads on the market.. however if you dont plan on changing out your bottom end i think the vortecs would be better because they come with smaller cumbustion chambers (64cc) while the afr's smallest chanber is a 72 cc ( i think... )
Jonny
Based on magazine flow tests, Dart Pro 1 w/ 230 cc intake runners as also RHS Pro Action heads with 235 cc intake runners flow better than any out of the box AFR heads
Based on magazine flow tests, Dart Pro 1 w/ 230 cc intake runners as also RHS Pro Action heads with 235 cc intake runners flow better than any out of the box AFR heads
Flow isn't HP. A local race shop build my engine late spring. It was the first time they used the new at the time AFR Eliminator heads. This shop builds about 2 383 street motors a week and often uses the exact same parts as my motor (except the heads). They did NO porting on the AFRs (but did port match the intake and change the springs). After the dyno session they made it clear that getting that performance would have otherwise required a $2200 set of heads.
I don't doubt there are other heads a good, but as good at the price I'm not sure about....
Flow isn't HP. A local race shop build my engine late spring. It was the first time they used the new at the time AFR Eliminator heads. This shop builds about 2 383 street motors a week and often uses the exact same parts as my motor (except the heads). They did NO porting on the AFRs (but did port match the intake and change the springs). After the dyno session they made it clear that getting that performance would have otherwise required a $2200 set of heads.
I don't doubt there are other heads a good, but as good at the price I'm not sure about....
So I wonder why the fastest 23 degree headed engines at the race track have either RHS, Dart Pro 1 or Brodix Track 1 heads?
I have a brand new GMPP 350 290 horse 4 bolt main, so I'm sure my bottom end is strong. Quite honestly I'm not that happy with it. It doesn't seem to have much more power than my original engine (190 hp!!!)
The 290 hp is gross hp. 190 is net hp. Your crate engine may be only 220 hp gross, so you've only gained around 30 hp (a significant gain, but not 100 hp). It's a good starting point though.
lets not get carried away with who has the best heads out there. each has its strong points for the intended use. the street and the race track are two dif. places and the demands of a race engine are much dif. than the street engine. a large port race head will not be street friendly on a 350ci motor. for the street and for the money the afr head is very hard to beat. some people run what could be considered a full race motor on the street and do just fine but for the majority of the street driven motors and combos the afr 195's are very hard to beat on a strong 350ci street motor. the main thing is to match the whole combo and its intended use. if you are not going to be spinning the motor up in the upper rpm range you will not want to go with a large cc head as it will be a waste and will not perform well. your cam and heads must match the flow,compression, and intended rpm range. the afr 195's come in 64cc and 75cc but can be custom ordered. i got mine in 72cc to give my combo a 10.5:1 comp. there are tons of factors that come into play when choosing a matched combo. i would suggest looking at proven combos and copy one that will suit your needs. pick a modern designed head that flows what your cam choice will need. the vortec head is a great head for the money but the afr is superior.