When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have a stock 1970 350/300 motor with an Edelbrock maniflod ,Holley carb and have have been offered an original 1970 LT1 Cam.
Would this be a good choice or should I look to get something else?
The LT1 is a decent cam but the technology is old. A long duration with a low lift. A shorter duration with a high lift will give you more grunt. A lot depends on your rear gear and transmission. A 3.08 geared automatic the cam would be a dog. A 4.11 geared stick it would work OK. I ran the LT1 cam in my LT1 for a few years and canned it for a more modern cam. Still solid lifters and it ran a lot better. I still run a big solid cam in my 385 motor but I have a low 1st gear and 3.70 gears out back, plus a lot of other mods. In a short answer I would pass on the cam and go with a more modern design cam.
The LT1 is a decent cam but the technology is old. A long duration with a low lift. A shorter duration with a high lift will give you more grunt. A lot depends on your rear gear and transmission. A 3.08 geared automatic the cam would be a dog. A 4.11 geared stick it would work OK. I ran the LT1 cam in my LT1 for a few years and canned it for a more modern cam. Still solid lifters and it ran a lot better. I still run a big solid cam in my 385 motor but I have a low 1st gear and 3.70 gears out back, plus a lot of other mods. In a short answer I would pass on the cam and go with a more modern design cam.
I am running a 3.08 rear with 4 speed. Can you recommend a cam?
What is the RPM operating range of that old LT1 Cam?
You'd be happier with one of the CompCams High Energy cams that's better matched to those gears such as the 206H or the 268H. You're limited to around .450 lift with the stock heads/springs.
The LT1 cam is made for high RPMs, and as a mechanical flat-tappet it's not a great street cam IMHO. CompCams still makes this grind under P/N 346S if you want to compare the specs.
My wife thinks the LT-1 cam is too small. The 1970 LT-1 roadster we have dosen't lope at idle like my 72 LT-1 with a solid roller cam, she wants me to put a bigger cam in the 70. Thats why I love my wife!
My wife thinks the LT-1 cam is too small. The 1970 LT-1 roadster we have dosen't lope at idle like my 72 LT-1 with a solid roller cam, she wants me to put a bigger cam in the 70. Thats why I love my wife!
You've got a keeper there. Not many like that around. That's why I'm single I guess.
Given your engine configuration at 10:1 SCR, and assumed stock exhaust manifolds you might want to look at an Engle Cams 21040-H, 215/222 @ .050" with .453"/ .471" ground on a 112 LSA.
For a cheaper alternative, you could use a Sum-K1103 with similar durations on a 114LSA but shorter lifts.
Just as a comparison, the L-46/L-82 cam specs are:
0.050” 224*/224*, 450”/.460”, icl 114*, ecl 114*, LSA 114* (intake close 47* ABC)
Last edited by Scott Marzahl; Oct 16, 2007 at 06:39 PM.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.