383 results
about 68 degrees, country road far from everything. Did a few 0-60 runs and then I got in two 1/4 mile runs.
Alot of tire spin I need to work on. 18" 275's on the back. O.K. enough foreplay.
best 1/4 mile (out of two)
60ft 2.18
330ft 5.88
0-60 5.23
0-100 12.63
1/8 8.85 at 83.1
1000ft 11.4
1/4 13.6 at 102.7
My best run out of three for 0-60 was 5.0 flat (tire spin).
By the way, Inf G35 sedan auto 0-60 was 6.5.
By the way. 383- 770 Holley Street Avenger, Edelbrock Perfomer RPM manifold, I am not numbers to post for my cam but I have them. ADV INT 272 INT and 272 EXH/ .050 Dur-216 INT and 216 exh. 4340 crank. world class heads. TH400 and B&M holeshot 2400 stall speed.
How can I get better results? (besides trying to reduce wheelspin).





With what you have, Get a LM1 air fuel ratio meter or some other vendor. To really dial it in. You have to work with timing and the carb to better what you have.
My third attempt at the 1/4 was cut short as the engine started to cut out at high RPM's. Does this make any sense after two o.k runs?
But you have a big gap in the wheel wells..... What is the overall diameter of your wheel/tyre combo ? A smaller diameter will increase wheel spin issues.
You have a 383 with a good strong low end torque output based on that cam spec and the performer manifold, and the resultant tyre spin issues.... You may be down on torque at the upper rpm, hence not gaining much if you rev out to redline. Do you have a dyno output of your motor..... You may gain a better time if you change up a little earlier to keep the motor in its maximum torque range.
Get better grip and you'll definitely bring down the times....
What diff gearing do you have?
Using an accellerometer requires a flat (level) track / road.
They are also prone to errors if not zeroed correctly at the start....
Tyre grip at a track is much better than any road surface, so 2.18s 60' should come down and wheel spin should be less of a problem.
Else get some M/T ET street radials..... I believe there is an 18" available now.
There might be some others who can suggest tuning tweaks..... eg cam timing could be altered to shift the torque peak to slightly higher rpm...
Good effort on first attempt though.
I have only just fired up my new 383, and need to get a few miles on it before I also do a few runs.
cheers
tom
Other than that, practise leaving without spinning the tires
Have you ever considered dropping the TH400 and going with a modified TH350. They can be built to take the abuse and don't suck up as much HP.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I have a TH400, even with my first time out I was able to pull 1.97 60' time. I will say I had a blast being able to launch without tire spin (almost no tire spin, something I am still working on).
I have a TH400, even with my first time out I was able to pull 1.97 60' time. I will say I had a blast being able to launch without tire spin (almost no tire spin, something I am still working on).
Hey chanc... I live pretty close to Plano, over in Lantana off of 407 near Flour Mound.
Anyway...I also have a 383 (spec's below) and hoping to hit the Denton 1/8th track soon... I would expect you to run better at Denton they prep the track there really well, several of my friends run there with great results.
Also like someone said get a LM1 and fine tune everything. I have one and it has worked wonders for me. You will be able to tune the crap out of your car and better than any dyno shop can unless you know the owner of a dyno.
We will have to hit the Denton track with a few others soon.
If-so, with 3.55 gears, 27"-tall tires (a guess? ), and a non-locking THM400, I'd guess you to be trapping about 5000 RPM:
you could throw more rear-gearing (3.90s ) at the car, so it'd be turning approx 5500 RPM at the same MPH, allowing the car to 'use-up' all of it's power & RPM potential in the quarter-mile.....
it might pick-up another .1-seconds of ET, making it a solid 12-second machine!
gears will help the car's performance at all RPM levels, but going from 3.55s to 3.73s is hard to justify, because it is such a small change.....
if all-out Low-ET is the goal, 4.11s would be better, and put the RPM near 5800 at your current trap-speed MPH.
Dyno-300 RWH and 347Tourqe
you ran 13s at 106, yet I regularly run 12-eighties at 105 (I have 4.11s, 28" slicks, and an 8"/4500 stall converter ) because my car possibly 'works' better than yours.
ET is about 'time', so work-on getting the 60' times as-quick as you can:
for every .1 you can improve the 60', the ET will generally-improve another .1 down-track.....
You'll need to run about 111-113 (minimum, more with less gearing or converter ) to reach 12-flat, so figure-out what kind of power that requires, then gear the car to hit that speed at max RPM in High Gear
P.S.: to answer your question directly, I saw a mid-'70s C3 with a stock ZZ502, THM400, 3.90s and 28" slicks walk off fthe line, then run 12.003 @ 112, while another C3, this one with a high-compression, high-winding 468" BBC, 4-speed, 4.11s, and similar slicks run 12-teens @ 116:
a tenth quicker while being 4 MPH slower.....
Last edited by Glensgages; Dec 6, 2007 at 09:31 PM.
The LM-1 should help better tune the carb for topend performance via changing out jets. And then dialing in the timing to match. Although I have a solid lifter cam, I STILL can't make good torque above 5300 rpm. Right now I'm second guessing the cam specs that came in the engine that I got from the seller, he built it some time ago and had to remember what they were. I have a feeling he was just trying to get rid of it and faked the funk with the specs as a selling point. Now my next thing to do after tuning with the LM-1 is check where the cam timing is at, -4, 0, or +4. Supposedly my cams specs are 248/248 dur and 525 lift which should be around the 1500-6500 rpm range according to some magazine ads, but that ain't happening.
Good luck with any changes and don't forget to update us with any improvments. I'll be watching this thread! Check my sig for more complete specs on my setup.














