hei conversion




I'm not terribly familiar with that particular distributor you have. Does it have a module bolted to the bottom of the housing, or does it just have the variable reluctance sensor in it and no module?
I'm not terribly familiar with that particular distributor you have. Does it have a module bolted to the bottom of the housing, or does it just have the variable reluctance sensor in it and no module?
It was shipped to me from Dave with the module separate from the distributor body.
I don't know if there is room to mount the module underneath the distributor body (as shown in certain examples on Dave's website), which I why inquired where you mounted your module.
I like the way you described how you did yours. Where would I get an aluminum heat sink?
Any other tips/trick you'd care to share?
Thanks
It is 50-50 with points if you forget and leave the key forward. If it is off the hi side of the cam....it will smoke the contacts in no time.
BTW...I had a Mallory conversion with Mallory coil in my 69' Tri-Power and it performed flawlessly.
Jebby




It was shipped to me from Dave with the module separate from the distributor body. Makes sense.
I don't know if there is room to mount the module underneath the distributor body (as shown in certain examples on Dave's website), which I why inquired where you mounted your module. IIRC, the housing needs machining work underneath it to provide a mounting surface. That's fine for dime a dozen aluminum distributor housings, but not for rare OEM tach drive units. It appears Dave is a smart individual who recognizes that it's not prudent to molest the cast iron distributors.
I like the way you described how you did yours. Where would I get an aluminum heat sink? Any modest size piece of aluminum plate should work well. The closed loop dwell circuit in the HEI module keeps the power dissipation down, so the aluminum just adds some thermal mass/inertia for RPM transient episodes, and also transfers the heat to the ignition shielding surface area.
Any other tips/trick you'd care to share?
Thanks
Good luck!
While going over Dave's parts & install instructions, I noticed that his external module actually has an aluminum base plate bolted to it. Perhaps this is his version of a heat sink?
Does anyone know the part# for these 4-prong modules? It must be an off-the-shelf GM part, correct?
I would feel better if I were carrying a spare.........
Thanks, once more.
OLD junkyard rodder here......for over 1/2 a century.....





It would probably cost less to buy an entire junkyard HEI distributor and retrieve the module than buy a spare (brand X) module at a parts store. And, the GM distributor is most likely going to have a genuine Delco module in it.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
In other words, I know that the HEI system CAN suppprt the larger spark plug gap, but does it REQUIRE the larger gap. Just curious.
SI




In other words, I know that the HEI system CAN suppprt the larger spark plug gap, but does it REQUIRE the larger gap. Just curious.
SI
The secondary voltage is primarily set by the plug gap size and the compression pressure, not by the ignition system. The emissions engines had low compression, so opening up the plug gap still resulted in modest plug arcover voltages (comparable to standard smaller gap on higher compression engines).
Most guys stick with the standard .035" plug gap (with most any ignition system) as that seems to be the size that just keeps system problems to a minimum.
1) they believe that a system with higher spark energy POTENTIAL will make their car more powerful {rarely true...only on very high-performance setups};
2) they believe that an electronic ignition system is more reliable. Interestingly, this is a "mixed bag" situation. While the electronic system requires LESS MAINTENANCE, being more reliable depends on your definition of "reliable". A properly setup points system will run for several thousand miles without need for maintenance or adjustment. And proper maintenance and adjustment for a points system will take an experience person about 1/2 hour. In addition, the points system will let you know when it needs maintenance and/or adjustment with minor ignition misses; and it will still run a long time...reasonably well...in that state. The electronic ignition system, however, will give you no warning when it is about to fail; IT JUST QUITS and leaves you on the side of the road. Anyone having an HEI unit and NOT carrying a spare HEI ignition module can be considered foolish. My experience indicates that they fail (due to heat cycling and vibration fatigue) about every 3-5 years.
If you know the particulars of each type of ignition system, you can choose the one best for you. I prefer the points system because of simplicity, robustness of a working system, and readily available parts.




1) they believe that a system with higher spark energy POTENTIAL will make their car more powerful {rarely true...only on very high-performance setups};
2) they believe that an electronic ignition system is more reliable. Interestingly, this is a "mixed bag" situation. While the electronic system requires LESS MAINTENANCE, being more reliable depends on your definition of "reliable". A properly setup points system will run for several thousand miles without need for maintenance or adjustment. And proper maintenance and adjustment for a points system will take an experience person about 1/2 hour. In addition, the points system will let you know when it needs maintenance and/or adjustment with minor ignition misses; and it will still run a long time...reasonably well...in that state. The electronic ignition system, however, will give you no warning when it is about to fail; IT JUST QUITS and leaves you on the side of the road. Anyone having an HEI unit and NOT carrying a spare HEI ignition module can be considered foolish. My experience indicates that they fail (due to heat cycling and vibration fatigue) about every 3-5 years.
If you know the particulars of each type of ignition system, you can choose the one best for you. I prefer the points system because of simplicity, robustness of a working system, and readily available parts.


















