When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Not really because some cam manufactors rate the advertised duration at .006 and some at .010 and some at random. The .050 numbers are the best to go by.
Not really because some cam manufactors rate the advertised duration at .006 and some at .010 and some at random. The .050 numbers are the best to go by.
And depending on the ramp angle the .050 and the advertised can differ significantly.
Dwell over nose is an important consideration too, but only if you're going to be doing SERIOUS number crunching.
From: At my Bar drinking and wrenching in Lafayette Colorado
Originally Posted by 454_71Stingray
Is there any conversion formula or is it completely apples and oranges?
There is no conversion or relation between the two. Ramp profiles and methods of determining "advertised" numbers make that impossible and irrelevant. Just use the .050 numbers - it's the only spec that means anything and that can be compared from one cam to another.
There is no conversion or relation between the two. Ramp profiles and methods of determining "advertised" numbers make that impossible and irrelevant. Just use the .050 numbers - it's the only spec that means anything and that can be compared from one cam to another.
This is what I thought, I guess I was looking for confirmation. Trying to compare two cams from different manufacturers and two different sources, Jegs typically displays 'advertised duration' and Summit displays '.050 duration' I was over thinking the problem. Thanks for the help and advice
From: Graceland in a Not Correctly Restored Stingray
In lieu of an official industry standard, 0.050" numbers give one a fairly straightforward indication, but not the full picture. So, IMHO it's more like an apples to pears comparison.
To get a better idea of a cam's profile, in addition to looking at 0.050" numbers it's a good idea to see what the 0.200" specs are. And, the advertised specs are still important, tho harder to quantify with there being no industry standard, since valve opening and closing events are specified at that point and the lash ramps can vary how the profile begins its approach to 0.050", also.
Of course, for those who want more detail you could check the specs of Cam Dr or Cam Pro Plus files on the cam(s) in question. Then there's Perf Trends' Cam Analyzer w/test stand setup if you reeealy want to see what you've got in your hands.
For most of us, the 0.050" numbers will suffice
Last edited by TheSkunkWorks; Jan 13, 2008 at 02:08 AM.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.