When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Anyone tried one of the Comp Cams new "Thumpr" cams? I'm rebuilding my 71' base 350 and thought I might try something different. Plus I like the lumpy idle sound.
Anyone tried one of the Comp Cams new "Thumpr" cams? I'm rebuilding my 71' base 350 and thought I might try something different. Plus I like the lumpy idle sound.
Haven't tried them. I see they come in retro hyd roller.
Looking at the specs you can do a lot better for performance. But if you want a stockish motor to sound really built and optimum performance and economy isn't an issue go for it.
In your case with extemely low compresson the earlier intake valve
closing with the tight LSA will help build some more compression.
make sure the duration is kept low to.
Different strokes for different folks: I like to look and sound as stock as possible, and watch their jaw drop when the hammer goes down. If you want to sound fast and be slow, I guess that's cool too , but I just don't get it. God bless, Sensei
Anyone tried one of the Comp Cams new "Thumpr" cams? I'm rebuilding my 71' base 350 and thought I might try something different. Plus I like the lumpy idle sound
You should rebuild L48 with more compression.
If you're running OE '71 heads ... suggest at minimum flattop pistons (-5cc) & FelPro p/n 1094 gaskets ... or small-dome Sealed Power p/n H618CP pistons (+3.5cc).
My 427/390 is nearing completion of it's 2nd rebuild in 21 years... can't complain about that. Last rebuild was stock. This time we're going for stock appearance but a bit more fun. Nothing radical and don't intend to race it, just wanted to treat it to a few benefits of modern bits.
So, we went with Edelbrock Performer RPM aluminum heads, a 454 crank, and the milder of the 3 Thumpr cams. It will also breath thru Flowmaster mufflers.
Is this the cam that offers the maximum HP or max torque... probably not. But that's not the intent of this build. This is a street car. For that reason I'm OK with running the stock pancake intake and exh manifolds, too. The guy building the engine has been doing BBC's for 3 decades and knows his stuff. He feels this combination will provide me a near stock look (painting the alum heads), great attitude and sound, and more than enough torque to keep me smiling.
Will post in a month or so when I've turned some gasoline into noise.
As long as you are at 9:1-9.5:1, otherwise IMHO, I think its too big for an approximate 8.2:1 stock rebuilt motor.
The XE250 would provide a better DCR of 7.4 with a 1094 head gasket and better throttle response.
The XE262 only provides you with 7.0.
As Jackson said, use some better pistons and/or heads if you want to use the XE262. Comp says to use at least 9.25 with that cam.
As long as you are at 9:1-9.5:1, otherwise IMHO, I think its too big for an approximate 8.2:1 stock rebuilt motor.
The XE250 would provide a better DCR of 7.4 with a 1094 head gasket and better throttle response.
The XE262 only provides you with 7.0.
As Jackson said, use some better pistons and/or heads if you want to use the XE262. Comp says to use at least 9.25 with that cam.
I think that's the mistake I made with my Goodwrench create motor in the 78'. I have the XE262H cam, but only about 8.2:1 CR. I was disappointed in the power output. My intent with the 71' motor is to use a piston that will get me to 9.5 with the stock heads.
I think that's the mistake I made with my Goodwrench create motor in the 78'. I have the XE262H cam, but only about 8.2:1 CR. I was disappointed in the power output. My intent with the 71' motor is to use a piston that will get me to 9.5 with the stock heads.
at thirty over, most flattops won't quite make even 9:1 ... but sealed power H618CP small dome +3.5cc will put you just over your target. ask CF member dmaaero he has em & has plenty miles & smiles. G'luck
My 427/390 is nearing completion of it's 2nd rebuild in 21 years... can't complain about that. Last rebuild was stock. This time we're going for stock appearance but a bit more fun. Nothing radical and don't intend to race it, just wanted to treat it to a few benefits of modern bits.
So, we went with Edelbrock Performer RPM aluminum heads, a 454 crank, and the milder of the 3 Thumpr cams. It will also breath thru Flowmaster mufflers.
Is this the cam that offers the maximum HP or max torque... probably not. But that's not the intent of this build. This is a street car. For that reason I'm OK with running the stock pancake intake and exh manifolds, too. The guy building the engine has been doing BBC's for 3 decades and knows his stuff. He feels this combination will provide me a near stock look (painting the alum heads), great attitude and sound, and more than enough torque to keep me smiling.
Will post in a month or so when I've turned some gasoline into noise.
I hope it makes you happy, but in general using a cam with tight LSA and a stock exhaust system is bad news.
A tight LSA gives you more overlap for a given cam size. The good part about overlap is that the exhaust gas
on the way out of the cylinder will actually help to draw intake gasses into the cylinder.
With a poor flowing exhaust you just end up with a lot of exhaust gas dilution still in the cylinder on the compresion stroke.
It may work for you with a smallish cam like that, but its certainly far from optimal.
I hope it makes you happy, but in general using a cam with tight LSA and a stock exhaust system is bad news.
Hey, thanks for the input. I won't know until we drive it a bit, and get it on the dyno. To your point about the exhaust, I am running the original iron manifolds, but the system is quite open... it's 2.5" true dual with 2-chamber Flowmasters. Hopefull all will work well together.
Thanks again>>>>>>>>>
I hope it makes you happy, but in general using a cam with tight LSA and a stock exhaust system is bad news.
A tight LSA gives you more overlap for a given cam size. The good part about overlap is that the exhaust gas
on the way out of the cylinder will actually help to draw intake gasses into the cylinder.
With a poor flowing exhaust you just end up with a lot of exhaust gas dilution still in the cylinder on the compresion stroke.
It may work for you with a smallish cam like that, but its certainly far from optimal.