Holley vs. Q-jet
Thread Starter
Heel & Toe
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Slidell, LA.
Holley vs. Q-jet
I have a 1979 corvette with ZZ4 in it it has a Q-jet it stumbles from a dead and then runs like a bat out of hell. My problem is I've had a 67 GTO and a 396SS El Camino with the same carb on them and hated that carb, had problems with all of them. Want to get a Holley dual feed , I have a friend with a ZZ4 in a 1977 with a Holley 750 cfm but he has an upgraded cam. Do you think mine will handle it. Thanks hjgator
Drifting
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 3
I prefer Holleys. They tune relatively easily, and don't do the weird things Q-jets always seem to to do (drop floats, inlets corrode off, run like crap...)
A ZZ4 would work best with a 600 CFM, since it redlines at 5800 rpm.
A ZZ4 would work best with a 600 CFM, since it redlines at 5800 rpm.
Safety Car
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,102
Likes: 1
From: Forsyth Illinois
I was having problems w/the q-jet on my 75 L82,and HATE rebuilding them,so had a new 650 Edelbrock here.Not as responsive as the q-jet.Put on a Holley I had here.Same thing,so rebuilt the Q-jet.It is 10 times more responsive,than w/the Edelbrock,or the Holley.Now....if you find a spread bore Holley.....that would be the way to go!
Pro
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
From: Quebec
It's all about a question of taste. You could make all 4 barrel carburator to perform...as long as you tune them right.
For my part, I love my Q-jet because it fits well with what I do with the car. Because it's a spread bore, it has really good throttle response when on the 2 little barrels. That's what I like when doing street cruising and I get 20 MPG out of it on long highway run. Then when you floor it, it perform as good as any other when it's well set up.
So if you only want to put a carb that perform and be done with it without taking care of MPG, go with the Holley. Don't get me wrong, Holley can be made as an MPG carb but they need lots of tuning too. They are just simpler to make them run without big bug.
Since you already have the Q-jet, I would read the Q-Jet Tuning Paper and tune it.
Any carb need a lot of work to run flawlessly.
Stephan
For my part, I love my Q-jet because it fits well with what I do with the car. Because it's a spread bore, it has really good throttle response when on the 2 little barrels. That's what I like when doing street cruising and I get 20 MPG out of it on long highway run. Then when you floor it, it perform as good as any other when it's well set up.
So if you only want to put a carb that perform and be done with it without taking care of MPG, go with the Holley. Don't get me wrong, Holley can be made as an MPG carb but they need lots of tuning too. They are just simpler to make them run without big bug.
Since you already have the Q-jet, I would read the Q-Jet Tuning Paper and tune it.
Any carb need a lot of work to run flawlessly.
Stephan
Race Director
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 11,520
Likes: 13
From: CORVETTE 77 385 C.I. TEXAS
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Every 2027 Corvette Engine Explained
Joe Kucinski
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Verdad Gallardo
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer
Brett Foote
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)
Michael S. Palmer
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years
Joe Kucinski
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!
Michael S. Palmer
Melting Slicks
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 2
From: Dayton Oh
I have a 1979 corvette with ZZ4 in it it has a Q-jet it stumbles from a dead and then runs like a bat out of hell. My problem is I've had a 67 GTO and a 396SS El Camino with the same carb on them and hated that carb, had problems with all of them. Want to get a Holley dual feed , I have a friend with a ZZ4 in a 1977 with a Holley 750 cfm but he has an upgraded cam. Do you think mine will handle it. Thanks hjgator
Melting Slicks
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 204
From: Lincoln CA
Let me know how it works out. I have a 69 427/390 that is a relative slug too. I suspect that there are linkage issues with the Q-Jet that prvents the secondaries from opening completely, but can't find anyone to address it for me. I do know that I can't hear or feel the secondaries kick in. With the size of those suckers, you'd think it would be obvious when they began dumping fuel. My car is also M21 equipped. The "69 Corvette Fact Book" that I got from the P.O. with the car sites performance numbers from magazines of the day for many of the engine/transmission combinations and the L-36 with an M21 and 3.36 gears (exactly as my car is equipped) ran a 15.02 @ 92 mph back in the day. That isn't exactly stellar performance. Maybe we are both expecting too much from these old buses. I won't build the engine, however, for the sake of keeping the car stock.
Drifting
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 1
From: North Bend Ohio
BigBlockk
Later.....
