








Which Carb?


I had always been a holley carb bigot in my younger days. Since I have had this car I have tried to stay true to the Q-Jet, mostly due to support for it here on the forum and my recent curiosity about it. I rebuilt this QJET two years ago, the car had been running pretty good for the most part, but I have had several recurring issues "off the line" stumble and WOT breakdown with it. Now it's stumbling all over the place. So while I'm not going to fully give up on it, I am going to buy a Holley so I can get the car running good and consistent while I fiddle with the QJet. So the question is; which Holley to buy? I have narrowed to three choices. My motor is a 350-250 crate with Ebrock 2101 which supports both spreadbore and straight bore with headers and 2 1/2" pipes with Flowmaster 50s.
Carb Options:
1. http://www.holley.com/0-80555C.asp
Model 4175 Spreadbore. This one seems the most straight forward choice. ince my existing fuel line would bolt right up I am also assuming my stock Cowl Air cleaner would fit right on. if anybody knows any different please let me know. The cons here are it's a Spreadbore (I believe straight bores have smoother secondary transition) and no exterior float adjustment.
2. http://www.holley.com/0-80457S.asp
Tried and true Holley 600 CFM. Only con I can think of is I have to replace the fuel supply line as well and rig it right side entry. Any others concerns here?
3. http://www.holley.com/0-80670.asp
Street Avenger 670. This is clearly the most flexible for tuning options and seems to be a pretty adaptable. I still would have to replace the fuel line and may have to consider a higher volume pump to feed to float bowls directly. My other concern is my air cleaner I really want to keep the stock cowl induction unit installed. However my gut and at least one seasoned motor guru I know says if I do this I'll never look back at the QJet.
Anybody ever try a street avenger on a 73-75 with stock cowl air?
Thanks for your time, comments and opinions as always. Driving weather is here!
Last edited by CheezMoe; Apr 16, 2008 at 10:37 PM.
Perhaps 10 minutes and $10 worth of metering rods might fix your problem.
If not tell us more specifically what exactly is happening and perhaps we can offer other suggestions.
Lastly, there's nothing sweeter than a well tuned q-jet,..well, carburetor wise.
Good luck!


I believe my stumble problems are mostly associated with the accelerator pump adjustment. However I have already broken one rod and now with a replacement on it it's all out of adjustment again. If anyone has any good tricks for adjusting the pump rod I'm all ears. Like I said I'm not giving up on the QJet.....just yet.
Any other opinions or votes on this? thanks to all for the input







I would still love to hear that my aircleaner will fit
Anybody ?
Rule the other stuff out before you get out the checkbook.
2. http://www.holley.com/0-80457S.asp
Tried and true Holley 600 CFM. Only con I can think of is I have to replace the fuel supply line as well and rig it right side entry. Any others concerns here?

As I've been posting on other threads, the 80457S flows plenty of air but doesn't deliver enough fuel out of the box for 330 hp with a customer 2 1/2" true dual exhaust and high-flow mufflers. I didn't have a lean acceleration problem with the stock parts until I put on full length headers and the custom exhaust.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Last edited by Cory1970; Apr 17, 2008 at 10:42 PM.
There is no "reason" to get a new carb unless you need to change size or are switching intakes. There are plenty of things that could be wrong besides the carb. Even if the carb is the culprit, you should be able to fix it fairly easily.


So at this point it's worth the cash to me to go the quick fix route. Like I said I am challenged by the QJET and will continue to try and conquer it, but I need my car running right now. B'side's I HAVE to do a Holley vs Qjet experiment of my own at this point.
I am however now leaning back to the Avenger. It turns out the 4175 does not have an integrated filter, which means I am replacing the fuel supply line either way. So since I have the spreadbore carb (QJet) I might go ahead with the straight bore holley. One or the other will be ordered by tomorrow.
Thanks again for all the advice.





In 1966 and 67 the factory was putting 585 cfm Holleys on 427/390 horse big blocks. They ran fine. In fact for low and mid range torque the smaller carbs actually perform better and are more fuel efficient. There are alot of charts out there that speak to engine size/horsepower and RPM's and what size carb you need. I also spoke with Holley tech. A 427/390 horse only needs 650CFM at 5,000 RPM. I rarely exceed that and usually live in the 1500-4,500 rpm range. The low and mid range torque is fabulous with this carb. If I was doing 1/4 mile blasts I would consider a 750 CFM carb.
In 1966 and 67 the factory was putting 585 cfm Holleys on 427/390 horse big blocks. They ran fine. In fact for low and mid range torque the smaller carbs actually perform better and are more fuel efficient. There are alot of charts out there that speak to engine size/horsepower and RPM's and what size carb you need. I also spoke with Holley tech. A 427/390 horse only needs 650CFM at 5,000 RPM. I rarely exceed that and usually live in the 1500-4,500 rpm range. The low and mid range torque is fabulous with this carb. If I was doing 1/4 mile blasts I would consider a 750 CFM carb.Holley recomends something between 600 - 670.
http://www.holley.com/applications/C...bSelection.asp


Strongly being considered. I ordered the 4175 carb today, so we will see how it does and go from there. The 600 did not have enough vac ports for my needs and the SA just looked too big and complex. The 4175 650 just adapts to everything too well to do anything different. it will also make swapping the Qjet back in much easier. The SA kicked *** in the voting though. I'll save that for future reference.Thanks to all for your input....I'll keep you posted...

















