When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
should i install the bladder in my new fuel tank or not?it looks to be in good shape.i dont no what to do so i will ask you.pros and cons please.thanks,tj
should i install the bladder in my new fuel tank or not?it looks to be in good shape.i dont no what to do so i will ask you.pros and cons please.thanks,tj
My bladder was in bad shape so I just reinstalled my tank without it. I actually gained about a gallon of capacity, and as far as I know the bladder was just a safety item designed to help keep the fuel in the tank in the event of a rear collision. I'm okay with not having one, but others may disagree.
From: San Diego - Deep Within The State of CONFUSION!
Originally Posted by Durango_boy
My bladder was in bad shape so I just reinstalled my tank without it. I actually gained about a gallon of capacity, and as far as I know the bladder was just a safety item designed to help keep the fuel in the tank in the event of a rear collision. I'm okay with not having one, but others may disagree.
Same here. I took mine out and the tank was pristine inside.
The bladder is there for safety reasons (mandated by the Feds) in the event of a collision. A spark could ignite gas fumes and we all know how fiberglass holds up under fire. If you can, I would definitely recommend reinstalling it.
The bladder is there for safety reasons (mandated by the Feds) in the event of a collision. A spark could ignite gas fumes.
Wouldn't this apply to every other car's gas tank, most of which are not equipped with a bladder? I understand the fiberglass burns a lot faster, but the fire would still start in a steel bodied car.
Wouldn't this apply to every other car's gas tank, most of which are not equipped with a bladder? I understand the fiberglass burns a lot faster, but the fire would still start in a steel bodied car.
On a plane about 30 years ago, I happened to be sitting next to a Fed who was very familiar with this bladder and why the Gov got involved. While I don't remember even how the subject came up, as I recall, it was an extreme safety issue since a rear end or side collision could result in a punctured fuel tank, which could result in fuel all over the place, which could result in a fire, and burn the Vette, and its occupants, to the ground in a very short few minutes. Other factors were, I believe, the proximity of the tank to external elements and the size of the car. One thing I remember very clearly was that this guy was very adamant about the safety provided by the bladder. Frankly, there is no way I run my Vette without one.
Here's something I found on the net regarding the subject. Tab down to General Motors, Exploding Gas Tanks: