Steeroids vs. Jeep steering box
Then I finished the car, and drove it, and remembered just how tight and perfect the steering is. It's crisp, easy, and I didn't have to change anything.
From what I heard, the Jeep box is a better swap that Steeroids, but it requires a lot of fab where the kit just bolts in.
Both would require money, but I realized that if I were to have to do it again I would have Gary rebuild my stock box, blueprint it, and be done with it. The cost would still be less than Steeroids, and would bolt in as a stock part.
Consider that as a first option, and then consider the other two if it doesn't feel favorable to you.
Both would require money, but I realized that if I were to have to do it again I would have Gary rebuild my stock box, blueprint it, and be done with it. The cost would still be less than Steeroids, and would bolt in as a stock part.
Consider that as a first option, and then consider the other two if it doesn't feel favorable to you.
YES,
The stock steering is fine as long as you have a tight steering box.
stick in a Grand Am rack and turns are a bit less than 3 and ratio is much closer to 12-1.....
with later shark wheel, beat THAT.....
sorry guys I part company with you all on that, the rack is a HUGE improvement over stock.....
I really can't comment on the Jeep box, as I never driven one, and then to boot would have to install on MY car with NO other changes to get a A-B comparison.....ain't a happening....
I suggest you remove it, send it to Gary, GTR1999, and have him blue print it / rebuild it. He'll send it back in a week or so, you can install it, and have super tight steering again. Replace the rag joint too with a nice high quality GM replacement part.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
However if you are not strong enough for manual steering, then you may find a better setup than the stock one.
Last edited by 68L71; Jul 17, 2008 at 07:12 PM.
what do you mean by 'a bit sensitive'?? you have to correct the car direction like a olde tyme car from say the 60's??? or you mean it follows ruts in the higher speed roads....ground in there by heavy trucks???
Over correct.. you mean you constantly fighting the wheel and keeping it on track??? side to side, and back/forth as in days of olde.???
and then I curious to know about your tires and wheels....size/type and condition of front/rear suspension....
please let me know....very curious about this techy topic....
what do you mean by 'a bit sensitive'?? you have to correct the car direction like a olde tyme car from say the 60's??? or you mean it follows ruts in the higher speed roads....ground in there by heavy trucks???
Over correct.. you mean you constantly fighting the wheel and keeping it on track??? side to side, and back/forth as in days of olde.???
and then I curious to know about your tires and wheels....size/type and condition of front/rear suspension....
please let me know....very curious about this techy topic....

The stock system provides excellent feedback. Not as precise as a rack or jeep but so what? Its all about the feel.
I just trying to get a handle on it for MY street driver, and get it straight in MY mind as to the improvement for any OTHER car recommendations....
it works for ME, but well???
road feel is good I think....but I kept the '72 pump valving from decades ago, into my '88 vette serp drive pump....
I just did it for long ago forgotten reasons....
there was some concern about the rack and pinion desing because of the brackets weren't strong enough and bend. not sure if it has been corrected.
you can modify a jeep box and you need a manual steering relay rod from a corvette and a pitman arm from an a-body,or you can buy a kit that bolts in(already modified)
stick in a Grand Am rack and turns are a bit less than 3 and ratio is much closer to 12-1.....
with later shark wheel, beat THAT.....
sorry guys I part company with you all on that, the rack is a HUGE improvement over stock.....
I really can't comment on the Jeep box, as I never driven one, and then to boot would have to install on MY car with NO other changes to get a A-B comparison.....ain't a happening....
I am with Gene on this one you think? you know how the steering pushes back harder as you turn tighter and tighter until the front wheels begin to break traction and the wheel stops pushing back so you can back off a bit before you spin. That's the kind of thing that's so very critical when driving a car on the edge. Overassisted steering won't let you know where the limits are.
I've just seen too many who have done these swaps say how easy the wheel turns and some complain of "video game' type steering. Parallel parking the car with one finger!
Maybe for a show n' shine cruiser but not for me.
Yes our steering system is a handfull in rutted roads because it indeed has so much feedback. But, if you make the C3 perfectly mild mannored and easy to drive, where's the fun in that.
Last edited by turtlevette; Jul 17, 2008 at 10:49 PM.


Before it would wander and track all over the place (running 17x8.5 front and 17x9.5 rear).
I switched to Steeroids before going on a trip from Chandler Arizona to Bowling Green and back. I was able to run 75-80 MPH with 2 fingers of my left hand on the wheel and it was as smooooooooth as could be. Response was instant and the feel was like a modern car.
Before it would wander and track all over the place (running 17x8.5 front and 17x9.5 rear).
I switched to Steeroids before going on a trip from Chandler Arizona to Bowling Green and back. I was able to run 75-80 MPH with 2 fingers of my left hand on the wheel and it was as smooooooooth as could be. Response was instant and the feel was like a modern car.
There you go, that last sentence right there, above.....














