Sanderson vs. McJacks
Thread Starter
Heel & Toe
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Sanderson vs. McJacks
Would anyone know which block hugger header is better? Better performance wise and coating wise. I am in the process of switching to Edelbrock Performer RPM aluminum heads and the tech's there say I should use 1 3/4 headers. I currently have 1 1/2 Sandersons. Since I have to upgrade the diameter which is better McJacks or Sanderson? I have a 1969 Corvette with a 350 4 speed.
Melting Slicks
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 12
From: Frederick Maryland
I can only tell you the experience I have with Sanderson ceramic coated block hugger headers as I've no experience with McJacks. Sanderson makes as good or better headers than any brand I've seen.
If McJacks' headers are better, then go with them. They must be a fantastic product.
If McJacks' headers are better, then go with them. They must be a fantastic product.
Thread Starter
Heel & Toe
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Thanks for the input. The coated Sandersons I have developed rust spotting that is why I asked about McJacks. Maybe I got a bad coating. Has anybody in the forum used McJacks? If they dont offer the fit and performance of Sanderson then I will have to stick with them
Advanced
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 58
Likes: 1
I highly recommend McJacks Headers
