When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Started out to replace the water pump. That ended up requiring a radiator and core support. The performer intake was just sitting here so its going on. Now I'm looking at the timing chain cover and all that empty space and it just seems like if I'm ever going to change the cam I should do it now. I am hoping someone more knowlegable than I can assist with the choice. 1980 auto 3.55 gears and the only non stock part is the intake. Looking for a little more power but not expecting a lot. Headers and heads next year. The Comp cams 268H has been tossed around but I have heard good things about the voodoo line as well. Thanks in advance for your recommendations.
OK I called competition cams and they recommended The XE262, anyone have a recommendation?
Mike
Good choice in my thinking or the XE268 both will give you good improvement in performance.
If ya really want more power, put on a set of good flowing heads while ya got the intake off.
Aftermarket heads have gotten much more reasonable in price than they use to be.
I'm going with Dart heads on my build, I've read threads that say they are more header friendly than edelbrock.
If you want the most bang for the buck just order the generic 204/214/112 cam from Summit, PAW, or SpeedPro - it has .420 lift intake and .443 lift on the exhaust. it idles with 18" vacuum in a 350 and will set you back about $120.00 for the cam, lifters, and gaskets. It makes very good power off idle and in the mid-range and is an excellent choice for a low compression 350. I have used dozens of these generic cams and never had a lobe or lifter fail. They are quality pieces.
Not to start a comp cams /Lunati war but Lunati is recommending their 60101 voodoo cam. Is there a difference?
There is a difference, but it is still opinion.
Harold Brookshire was hired by Lunati with his #1 priority being to design a new line of cams to beat Comp's XE line.
According to him, the Voodoo line accomplished that goal.
They reportedly made more power, and are also typically quieter than than the XE cams.
Thats because the Voodoo cams close the valves "softer" than the XE cams do.
Overall, both lines of cams perform well though.
By the way the 60101 Voodoo is a smaller cam than the XE262.
If you want a similar sized Voodoo to compare to, look at the 60102.
If you want the most bang for the buck just order the generic 204/214/112 cam from Summit, PAW, or SpeedPro - it has .420 lift intake and .443 lift on the exhaust. it idles with 18" vacuum in a 350 and will set you back about $120.00 for the cam, lifters, and gaskets. It makes very good power off idle and in the mid-range and is an excellent choice for a low compression 350. I have used dozens of these generic cams and never had a lobe or lifter fail. They are quality pieces.
see summit SUM-K1102
you'll pick up a bit more compression if you'll change the head gaskets to fel-pro p/n 1094
If you want the most bang for the buck just order the generic 204/214/112 cam from Summit, PAW, or SpeedPro - it has .420 lift intake and .443 lift on the exhaust. it idles with 18" vacuum in a 350 and will set you back about $120.00 for the cam, lifters, and gaskets. It makes very good power off idle and in the mid-range and is an excellent choice for a low compression 350. I have used dozens of these generic cams and never had a lobe or lifter fail. They are quality pieces.
That is the 1102 cam. I've used it, and the 1103 (214/224, .442/.465) and I'm running the 1105 (224/234, .465/.488) with 1.65 roller rockers now. I thought I was the only Summit cam fan. Cheap and powerful, and so far, very reliable. Power on a budget. Someone told me who makes the cams for summit, but I don't recall right now.
Bee Jay
remember to add eos from gm or any of the good oil manufactures the new oils today are lacking zinc from them and with out it the cam would wear out a lobe a cam in the 216 to 224 @.050 in the .450 range will work well 110 seperation will be good for torque and give a lopey sound 112 better mid and top end and vacume
thanks donnie
Like Bee Jay says..........the generic cams work very well. They are made by Crane and I have used them in Chevys, Pontiacs, and big Mopars and they work just as good as the bigger name brands. The real question is what do you expect from your motor? If you want to retain all the stock components then you really need to stick with a cam in the 204 to 210 @ .050 intake duration. If you're running a free flowing exhaust along with optimized spark advance and a fattened up carb then you can move up a notch. Just be advised that you probably wont have the good low speed characteristics of the "tiny" cam. A good rule is that for every 10 degrees of added duration you will need to add one point of compression to keep the the low rpm operation the same.