When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I've just finished removing all 8 body mount bolts from my '74 as I have to replace the #3 crossmember (rusted thru BIG TIME.... Obviously I have a big job ahead of me). Only 3 of the 8 bolts came out without having to get the sawz-all involved and I have to purchase a new kit.
I was wondering if I should replace the bodymounts with rubber or polyurethane. You guys have any thoughts.... pro & cons, etc.
The rubber mounts were introduced in '73 as a method of reducing road vibration being transmitted to the cabin.
Poly mounts are an excellent way of negating that product improvement. Your call.
Sounds a little arrogant, don'tya think ? Everybody not agreeing with your point of view is negating the product ? At least the aluminum did not dry rot and crumble after a few years. Poly is better than rubber and softer than aluminum.
I have one C-3 with poly and one with new rubber mounts. You can tell the ride difference. I notice the bumps in the road much more with the poly. The rubber is a softer ride. It's up to how you want the car to perform which way you go poly or rubber.
i too would suggest poly mounts. Once i get mine started, ill be doing that. i plan on having the car a long time and just like changing the oil pan gasket, in the L48... i dont plan on doing mounts again either!
Since our cars are fiberglass and a bit brittle, I would go w/rubber. Less vibration means less rattles and squeaks. I would use poly on all suspension areas that we want to take the slop out of. JMHO
Sounds a little arrogant, don'tya think ? Everybody not agreeing with your point of view is negating the product ? At least the aluminum did not dry rot and crumble after a few years. Poly is better than rubber and softer than aluminum.
Not arrogant at all. Just someone giving an opinion, right? "Everybody?" not agreeing with this point of view? I'm certainly not seeing it that way.