When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Beautiful Car...
Funny how it sounds a little bit different than my dads 355 which also has the performer RPM cam. I guess it could be the sidepipes that make it sounds a little different.
My 355 ci was 10.6 or 10.7 C/R with way to much money into 64cc 186 double hump castings. -5 cc valve relief flat tops with the .015 steel shim head gaskets. Mallory Unilite vac dist. With the crane 278 powermax H-flat cam 1.6 roller rockers weiand single plane 750 edelbrock and demon 750 right before it went to crusher. I had that motor for about 10 years and 100.000 some miles. with a Hot rodded TH350 and 355 gears it was over 21 mpg on extended highway trips.
Heres a cheapir combo that runs real good (did this one years ago)
350 .030 over
CAT forged rotating assy (balancer too)from speed-o-motive
Hyperutectic flat tops, 11:1 with 0 deck
Perfprmer RPM heads with some cleanup work. 1/6 rocker
Comp Solid flat tappet 244/252, .520/.530 lift 110
Team G (it wanted a 1" open spacer) or Performer Rpm, 750 D.P.
Had very little in this thing, car absolutely ripped. We laughed because it was such a cheapie backyard build and ran so good
Probably wouldnt recommend the hypers, a better head would make more power too but it was what it was. It sounded real radical but actually drove pretty well, made halfway decent torque and would flat out scream. 700r, 4.11 and 2800 stall.
Building a 355 IMHO is generally a waste of $$$ given that it's pretty much a financial wash with a 383. If you're going to build one that's really rowdy, you're already into a forged rotating assy...so why not pick up the extra cubes?
Doesn't mean that a hot 355 isn't a fun engine - but in terms of cubic dollars there are better choices.
I've built a couple of all forged 355s that saw north of 7K RPM...and they were a riot just because you usually don't hear them going that high One of them was a near-spec 1970 LT-1 that I had originally intended to build for myself, the other was an RHS 200cc head solid roller cam (retrofit) with a rev kit. Neither were engine dyno'd, and I didn't get any performance specs from the owners afterwards :/
Neither were engine dyno'd, and I didn't get any performance specs from the owners afterwards :/
Ugh, I hate that....Taking all the time to plan and build , winds up never sees the dyno and they are afraid to take it down the track regardless of all the talk of doing this in the beginning of the build. I dont get it..
Well, for a lot of guys it's about getting the engine in the chassis as soon as possible
I don't do "professional" builds (i.e., I don't and don't try to make a profit) and so it's all friends or friends of friends. And the vast majority are what I'd consider performance overhauls vs. full designs.
From: All humans are vermin in the eyes of Guru VA
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran
Here is my cammotion camshaft.
Grind Number S2461-2531-10+4
Duration (intake/exaust) 246/253
Lift (intake/exaust) .560/.541
Lobe Center Separation 110
Intake Centerline 106
Comments valve lash .024 on int. and exh.
Price US$$177.00 + frt.
Here is my cammotion camshaft.
Grind Number S2461-2531-10+4
Duration (intake/exaust) 246/253
Lift (intake/exaust) .560/.541
Lobe Center Separation 110
Intake Centerline 106
Comments valve lash .024 on int. and exh.
Price US$$177.00 + frt.
Very nice intake lift.
Last edited by Little Mouse; Dec 8, 2008 at 04:08 PM.
Heres a cheapir combo that runs real good (did this one years ago)
350 .030 over
CAT forged rotating assy (balancer too)from speed-o-motive
Hyperutectic flat tops, 11:1 with 0 deck
Perfprmer RPM heads with some cleanup work. 1/6 rocker
Comp Solid flat tappet 244/252, .520/.530 lift 110
Team G (it wanted a 1" open spacer) or Performer Rpm, 750 D.P.
Had very little in this thing, car absolutely ripped. We laughed because it was such a cheapie backyard build and ran so good
Probably wouldnt recommend the hypers, a better head would make more power too but it was what it was. It sounded real radical but actually drove pretty well, made halfway decent torque and would flat out scream. 700r, 4.11 and 2800 stall.
What kind of RPM did you turn it too? My KB hyper pistoned 355 finally died from rpm related piston meltdown
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Build it and see, I built a solid roller motor with top notch 220cc 23 deg aluminum heads and a cam with 250 duration ,620" lift with 406ci, 11:1 cr to get that kind of HP, maybe I should have just built a flat tappet 355ci
I was more than agnostic, but I came up with similar numbers in DD Advanced/Pro Tools: 539FWHP@6500 RPM and 480FWTQ@4500-5000RPM. I honestly can't see it from the specs...but The heads are pretty decent - 261/172 flow @ .500 and the cam is pretty healthy too.
It's worth noting this is with large tube headers and open exhaust - big engine dyno numbers :/
I see they used a 220 runner head, a cam with more duration even if the lobe centers were narrow.
I had an article in one of the rags I sent the whole magazine to ratflinger when he was considering dart heads for a 383/396, anyway this was before dart came out with the platinum iron heads, they tested all five of darts iron heads 165,180,200,215,230 runners on a 355, 10.0 comp. Considerable less cam then guru is going to use, edelbrock dual plane holley 750 carb. The people writing the article were expecting the 180 runner head to be the best match, after the testing the 215 runner head made the most power not just at the upper HP limits of the engine, the most overall power across the intire power band of the test, even the 230 head came in second in overall power.
Last edited by Little Mouse; Dec 9, 2008 at 01:29 PM.